TRIPS协议第四十条下的滥用专利权规制研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 08:32

本文选题：专利权 + 权利滥用　；参考：《上海交通大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：没有哪一部国际协议能比TRIPS更体现发达国家与发展中国家在知识产权国际贸易上的对立了。然而，发展中国家应该如何在符合TRIPS协议的前提下制定符合自己利益的法律，是一个较为复杂的问题。因此，本文拟在回顾TRIPS签订的历程、考察各个国家在本国滥用专利权问题上的相关做法，以期能清晰滥用专利权概念的内涵、外延和其对国家利益的影响，，为我国的相关立法提供前瞻性的预测。与国内现有的其他研究相比,本文不拘泥于从国内立法角度来分析问题，同时从TRIPS协议产生时的历史背景来阐述协议背后的发达国家和发展中国家的博弈关系。另一方面，在借鉴美国、欧洲、日本、德国、英国、中国台湾的相关立法实践的基础上，对中国相关法规的立法前景做出展望。全文分为引言、正文、结论三大部分,其中正文由四章构成: 第一章主要介绍了滥用专利权的基本定义，并进一步从主观要件、主体要件、客观要件和客体要件的角度阐述了滥用专利权的各个要素。第二章主要介绍了美国、欧盟、日本、德国以及我国台湾地区对滥用专利权的相关法律规制，对各个国家的做法进行了初步比较。第三章从TRIPS的产生背景出发，详细叙述了发达国家和发展中国家在签署TRIPS时的关系，进而对TRIPS第40条展开叙述。第四章首先介绍了我国立法机关在滥用专利权上的立法现状，根据中国在签订TRIPS时的历史背景和当前在世界上的地位，对这些年的法规稍加分析，然后根据中国的当前科技研发能力给出滥用专利权的规制建议，并对中国日后的立法趋势加以展望。 TRIPS协议中关于利用专利权扭曲贸易程序的规定已经为各个成员规制专利滥用设定了大致的制度框架。相应地，我国应该在TRIPS协议的框架下进一步完善专利权滥用的法规，以优化我国垄断法和反不正当竞争法在知识产权问题上的制度。在反垄断法对知识产权滥用的规制上，一定要根据中国的自身工业研发体系的现状来决定是否应该借鉴发达国家和地区的立法，从而进一步决定专利权滥用与反垄断法的关系，到底滥用专利权是相关权利主体违反反垄断法的前提还是结果，才能避免日后以反垄断法规制知识产权滥用走入误区。
[Abstract]:There is no international agreement more than the TRIPS that represents the antithesis between developed and developing countries in international trade in intellectual property rights. However, how developing countries should make laws in accordance with the TRIPS agreement is a more complicated issue. Therefore, this paper intends to review the process of signing TRIPS, examine the relevant practices of each country on the issue of patent abuse in their own countries, in order to clearly understand the connotation, extension and impact on the national interests of the concept of patent abuse. To provide foresight forecast for the relevant legislation of our country. Compared with other domestic studies, this paper does not focus on the analysis of the problem from the perspective of domestic legislation, and expounds the game relationship between developed and developing countries behind the TRIPS protocol from the historical background when it came into being. On the other hand, based on the relevant legislative practice of the United States, Europe, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom and Taiwan, the prospect of the relevant laws and regulations in China is prospected. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is composed of four chapters: The first chapter mainly introduces the basic definition of patent abuse, and further expounds the elements of patent abuse from the perspective of subjective elements, subjective elements, objective elements and object elements. The second chapter mainly introduces the relevant laws and regulations on patent abuse in the United States, the European Union, Japan, Germany and Taiwan, and makes a preliminary comparison of the practices of each country. From the background of TRIPS, the third chapter describes the relationship between developed and developing countries when signing TRIPS, and then describes Article 40 of TRIPS. The fourth chapter first introduces the legislative status of the abuse of patent rights in China's legislature. According to the historical background of China's signing of TRIPS and its current status in the world, it makes a little analysis of the laws and regulations of these years. Then according to China's current scientific and technological R & D capabilities, the author gives some suggestions on the regulation of patent abuse, and looks forward to the future trend of China's legislation. The provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the use of patent rights to distort trade procedures have set a general institutional framework for each member to regulate patent abuse. Accordingly, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, China should further perfect the regulations on patent abuse, so as to optimize the system of China's monopoly law and anti-unfair competition law on the issue of intellectual property rights. In the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights in the anti-monopoly law, we must decide whether we should learn from the legislation of developed countries and regions according to the current situation of China's own industrial research and development system, so as to further determine the relationship between patent abuse and anti-monopoly law. After all, the abuse of patent right is the premise or result of the violation of antimonopoly law by the relevant subject of rights, so as to avoid the misunderstanding of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by anti-monopoly law in the future.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D997.1

【参考文献】