侵犯商业秘密诉前禁令制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 14:05

本文选题：商业秘密 + 诉前禁令　；参考：《首都经济贸易大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：诉前禁令被称为“商业秘密的血液”，是诉讼法律制度中的一项制度，商业秘密诉前禁令①则是诉前禁令制度在商业秘密领域中的适用。禁令制度是权利人在普通法的损害赔偿无法充分得到补偿的情况下，产生的一种依据衡平法来实现利益的救济制度。诉前禁令可以及时预防和制止侵权行为，避免权利人的损失的发生或进一步的扩大。由于商业秘密的秘密性及价值性使其具有“一旦丧失就永远丧失”的特性，只有获得诉前禁令救济，权利人才能及时保住商业秘密，所以诉前禁令救济对于商业秘密而言具有特别重大的意义。本文在借鉴国外法律及司法实践的基础上，提出若干完善我国商业秘密诉前禁令制度的建议。全文分为引言、正文和结语三部分。正文分为五章。第一章介绍了商业秘密诉前禁令的概念、特点、渊源、意义及与我国其他民事保全程序的区别。首先回顾了禁令的历史渊源及商业秘密禁令救济的发展；其次，分析了商业秘密诉前禁令的概念、特点及存在的独特价值；最后，在比较商业秘密诉前禁令与民事诉讼法上类似制度即诉前财产保全、先予执行及《民法通则》中的停止侵权制度的区别后，分析了商业秘密诉前禁令的性质。第二章介绍了主要国家的诉前禁令制度的概况及我国知识产权法中关于诉前禁令的现状。首先介绍了英美法系的代表的英国和美国的诉前禁令制度以及大陆法系国家的相关制度；其次，详细介绍了TRIPS协议中的第五十条关于临时措施的规定，这也是国际上保护知识产权的一大进步；最后，介绍了我国知识产权法中诉前禁令的规定，从而分析了商业秘密领域中引入诉前禁令的必要性。第三章，具体分析了商业秘密诉前禁令适用的四个实质条件，即情势紧迫性——侵权已经存在或即将发生；不可弥补的损害；提供了有效的担保及利益的权衡。第四章，介绍了商业秘密诉前禁令的担保问题。首先分析了适用商业秘密诉前禁令需要提供担保的必要性，接着针对担保的实际问题即担保的方式，担保数额的确定及反担保问题做了详细分析。第五章，从商业秘密诉前禁令与程序公正的关系的角度出发，分析了诉前禁令与程序公平的几个原则之间的关系及冲突，接着提出解决两者之间冲突的方法，，即设立听证程序及复议程序。
[Abstract]:Pre-lawsuit injunction is called "the blood of trade secret", which is a system in the legal system of litigation, and the injunction of pre-lawsuit of trade secret is the application of the injunction system in the field of trade secret. The injunction system is a relief system in which the obligee can not get full compensation for damages under the common law and realizes the benefits according to the equity law. Pre-litigation injunction can prevent and stop the infringement in time and avoid the loss of the obligee. Because of the secrecy and value of trade secret, it has the characteristic of "losing it forever". Only by obtaining the relief of pre-lawsuit injunction, can the obligee keep the trade secret in time. Therefore, pre-lawsuit injunctive relief is of great significance to trade secrets. On the basis of drawing lessons from foreign law and judicial practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the injunction system of pre-lawsuit of trade secret in our country. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept, characteristics, origin, significance and differences from other civil protection procedures. First of all, it reviews the historical origin of prohibition and the development of trade secret prohibition relief; secondly, it analyzes the concept, characteristics and unique value of trade secret injunction. After comparing the differences between the pre-lawsuit prohibition of trade secret and the similar system of civil procedure law namely property preservation prior execution and cessation of tort system in General principles of Civil Law the author analyzes the nature of the prohibition on trade secret before litigation. The second chapter introduces the general situation of the injunction system in the main countries and the current situation of the injunction in the intellectual property law of our country. Firstly, it introduces the pre-litigation injunction system of the United Kingdom and the United States, which is the representative of Anglo-American law system, as well as the relevant systems of the continental law system countries. Secondly, it introduces the provisions of Article 50 of the TRIPS Agreement on interim measures in detail. This is also a great progress in the international protection of intellectual property rights. Finally, the article introduces the provisions of pre-lawsuit prohibition in intellectual property law of our country, and analyzes the necessity of introducing pre-suit injunction in the field of trade secrets. The third chapter analyzes the four essential conditions for the application of the pre-lawsuit injunction of trade secret, namely, the urgency of the situation, the existence or imminent occurrence of tort, irreparable damage, and the effective guarantee and balance of interests. The fourth chapter introduces the guarantee of pre-lawsuit prohibition of trade secret. This paper first analyzes the necessity of the application of the pre-suit injunction of trade secrets to provide security, and then makes a detailed analysis of the actual problem of security, namely, the way of security, the determination of the amount of security and the problem of counter-guarantee. In the fifth chapter, from the angle of the relationship between the injunction of trade secret and the procedural justice, the author analyzes the relationship and conflict between the injunction and the procedural fairness, and then puts forward the methods to resolve the conflict between the two. The procedure of hearing and reconsideration shall be established.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923

【引证文献】