创新政策对企业创新产出影响机理研究

发布时间：2018-06-19 20:03

本文选题：创新政策 + 创新产出　；参考：《大连理工大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：自2006年我国实施自主创新战略以来,“企业怎样才能成为自主创新的主体”始终备受社会各界关注。为强化企业技术创新主体地位,我国陆续出台了一系列创新政策。然而,不同类型的创新政策对企业创新产出的影响机理和激励效应不同,这就要求政府根据创新型国家建设的要求,选择恰当的政策组合,以实现创新政策激励效应的最大化。因此,研究创新政策对企业创新产出的影响机理,分析不同类型的创新政策组合对企业创新产出的激励效应,对于我国政府创新政策的制定和实施具有重要的理论和现实意义。文章首先对创新政策的内涵进行了界定,阐述了创新政策的功能,并从企业创新能力、创新资源、创新环境和创新过程四个方面对创新政策的类型进行分析,在此基础上构建创新政策功能研究框架,从供给型政策、需求型政策、环境型政策三个维度揭示创新政策对企业创新产出的影响机理。然后采用系统动力学方法绘制了创新政策对企业创新产出作用的因果关系图,利用VENSIM软件,以创新政策对企业创新产出的影响为主线构建系统动力学模型,对创新政策影响企业创新产出的机理进行分析。通过计算机仿真模拟,采用敏感性分析和政策组合变动效应实验对不同类型的单项政策和政策组合进行调整,分析不同政策组合对企业创新产出的激励效应,为创新政策的制定与执行提供理论依据。文章得到的研究结论如下：在以专利和新产品为目标函数的条件下,供给型政策对企业创新产出的激励效应最显著,环境型政策次之,需求型政策的激励效应最弱；在供给型政策中,财政支持政策的激励效应大于教育培训政策的激励效应,但是教育培训政策能够在较长时期内稳定提升企业的创新产出,并且当教育培训政策的累计效应产生后再加大财政支持政策的投入力度会对企业创新产出产生最显著的激励效应；在环境型政策中,科技服务政策和知识产权政策的激励效应显著,基础设施建设和金融支持政策的激励效应相对较弱；需求型政策中政府采购对企业创新产出具有显著的激励效应。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of independent innovation strategy in China in 2006, "how can enterprises become the main body of independent innovation" has always been concerned by all walks of life. In order to strengthen the main position of enterprise technological innovation, China has introduced a series of innovation policies one after another. However, different types of innovation policies have different influence mechanisms and incentive effects on enterprises' innovation output, which requires the government to choose the appropriate policy combination according to the requirements of innovative national construction, so as to maximize the incentive effect of innovation policies. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the influence mechanism of innovation policy on enterprise innovation output and to analyze the incentive effect of different types of innovation policy combination on enterprise innovation output. This paper defines the connotation of innovation policy, expounds the function of innovation policy, and analyzes the types of innovation policy from four aspects: enterprise innovation ability, innovation resources, innovation environment and innovation process. On this basis, the research framework of innovation policy function is constructed to reveal the influence mechanism of innovation policy on enterprise innovation output from three dimensions: supply policy, demand policy and environment policy. Then the causality diagram of the effect of innovation policy on enterprise innovation output is drawn by system dynamics method, and the system dynamics model is constructed by using VENSIM software and taking the influence of innovation policy on enterprise innovation output as the main line. This paper analyzes the mechanism of innovation policy influencing enterprise innovation output. Through computer simulation, sensitivity analysis and policy portfolio change effect experiment are used to adjust different types of individual policies and policy combinations, and the incentive effects of different policy combinations on innovation output are analyzed. To provide theoretical basis for the formulation and implementation of innovation policy. The conclusions are as follows: under the condition of patent and new product as the objective function, the incentive effect of supply policy is the most significant, environmental policy is the second, and demand policy is the weakest. In the supply-oriented policy, the incentive effect of the financial support policy is greater than that of the education and training policy, but the education and training policy can steadily promote the innovation output of the enterprise in a long period of time. And when the cumulative effect of the education and training policy comes into being, increasing the investment of the financial support policy will produce the most significant incentive effect on the innovation output of the enterprise; in the environmental policy, The incentive effect of sci-tech service policy and intellectual property policy is significant, the incentive effect of infrastructure construction and financial support policy is relatively weak, and the government procurement has significant incentive effect on enterprise innovation output in demand-oriented policy.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F273.1

【参考文献】