著作权法中思想与表达二分法之合并原则及其适用

发布时间：2018-06-25 12:57

  本文选题：著作权 + 思想　； 参考：《知识产权》2017年01期

【摘要】：面对著作权保护扩张之趋势,如何明确保护与不保护之界限,一直是国内外学术界长期探讨的重要问题。思想与表达二分法原则被认为是目前为止能够解决该问题的最佳基本原则。然而,该原则难以对著作权的具体保护范围划出明确界限,存在一定语义含混。尤其是思想一词难以界定,给立法和司法实践带来一定困难。近年来,我国著作权保护范围的扩张趋势日益明显。同时,在世界知识产权竞争中处于明显弱势的情形,也要求我国结合国内经济文化发展水平及文化产业、知识产权保护现状及需求,积极吸纳思想与表达二分法原则,以对知识产权中的私有领域和公有领域做出明确界定,更要结合本国实际在立法和司法实践中将思想与表达在灵活合并的基础上探讨其具体的适用方式和范围。
[Abstract]:In the face of the trend of copyright protection expansion, how to define the limits of protection and non-protection has been an important issue in academic circles at home and abroad for a long time. The principle of dichotomy of thought and expression is considered to be the best basic principle to solve the problem so far. However, it is difficult for this principle to draw a clear limit to the specific scope of copyright protection, and there is a certain semantic ambiguity. In particular, the term thought is difficult to define, which brings some difficulties to legislation and judicial practice. In recent years, the expansion trend of copyright protection scope in China is becoming more and more obvious. At the same time, the obvious weakness in the competition for intellectual property rights in the world also requires China to actively absorb the principle of dichotomy of thought and expression in the light of the level of domestic economic and cultural development and cultural industries, and the current situation and needs of intellectual property protection. In order to clearly define the private domain and the public domain in intellectual property rights, we should combine the practice of our country in legislation and judicial practice to discuss the concrete application way and scope of thinking and expression on the basis of flexible combination.
【作者单位】： 兰州财经大学;
【分类号】：D923.41
，

本文编号：2066002