一揽子打包许可中垄断搭售行为的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-11 10:41

本文选题：打包许可 + 垄断搭售　；参考：《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：搭售行为一直是知识产权领域一个十分重要的课题，在当今经济社会联系越来越密切的大环境之下，不管是我国政府还是我国企业都应该重视搭售行为在社会经济生活中的影响。因为作为专利池最重要的运行模式，系统而谨慎地研究搭售行为，是我们积极应对国外专利池冲击的应有之意。但是现实问题是，我国关于搭售行为的系统研究较少，所以，对搭售行为进行一次系统研究实属必要。基于搭售行为对专利池的重要性，，本文首先简单地介绍了专利池。通过对专利池的介绍引出一揽子打包许可。对一揽子打包许可的积极效益分析主要是从打包许可产生的实践与理论基础着手。阐明打包许可的积极效益后，又指出，打包许可还会导致被人诟病的搭售行为，进而引出全文的写作核心——搭售行为。在论述搭售行为时，对搭售定义的介绍引入多学科，综合地介绍了法学和其他学科领域有关搭售的定义，通过综合不同领域的意见进而得出自己对搭售的见解。在介绍完搭售的相关知识以后，着重探讨搭售行为的正反两方面的作用。在叙述搭售行为的消极作用时则主要是从搭售行为与反垄断法的关系等角度入手的，在这部分写作中，本文引用了大量地法条以及相关案列，让文章更具说服力。同时在论文写作过程中提出自己的观点：对搭售行为进行分类的必要性与重要性。在论述垄断搭售行为与市场支配力时，运用了比较分析法和案例法来支撑文中观点。在论述搭售行为的积极效益则是从垄断豁免制度着手，在这部分写作中探讨了搭售行为符合豁免制度的原因，以及各国搭售豁免制度的相关规定和搭售豁免的案例。在文末对如何完善我国搭售豁免制度提出了自己的两点看法和建议：一是积极吸取国外垄断豁免制度的优秀立法，特别是欧盟立法中对垄断豁免的颜色分类，就很值得我国立法去借鉴；二是在审查制度上，坚持事前审查和事后审查相结合的方法，尽量把垄断搭售豁免的消极影响降到最小化。
[Abstract]:Tying up has always been a very important topic in the field of intellectual property rights. Under the environment of increasingly close economic and social ties, Both Chinese government and Chinese enterprises should attach importance to the influence of tying behavior in social and economic life. As the most important operation mode of patent pool, it is our intention to study the tying behavior systematically and carefully. However, the practical problem is that there are few systematic studies on tying behavior in China, so it is necessary to conduct a systematic study on tying behavior. Based on the importance of tying behavior to patent pool, this paper introduces patent pool briefly. The introduction of the patent pool leads to a package license. The positive benefit analysis of package license is mainly based on the practice and theory of package license. After expounding the positive effect of packaging license, it is pointed out that packaging license will also lead to the criticized tying behavior, which leads to the writing core of the full text-tying behavior. When discussing the behavior of tying, the definition of tying is introduced, and the definition of tying in law and other disciplines is introduced synthetically. By synthesizing the opinions of different fields, the author obtains his own opinions on tying. After introducing the related knowledge of tying, this paper mainly discusses the positive and negative effects of tying behavior. When narrating the negative effect of tying behavior, it is mainly from the angle of the relationship between tying behavior and anti-monopoly law. In this part of writing, this article quotes a large number of articles and related cases, which makes the article more convincing. At the same time, in the process of writing, I put forward my own point of view: the necessity and importance of classifying tying behavior. In the discussion of monopoly tying and market power, comparative analysis and case law are used to support the point of view in this paper. In this part, the author discusses the reasons why the tying behavior conforms to the exemption system, and the relevant regulations of the system and the cases of the exemption. At the end of the paper, the author puts forward his own two views and suggestions on how to perfect the exemption system of tying sale in our country. One is to actively absorb the excellent legislation of foreign monopoly exemption system, especially the color classification of monopoly exemption in EU legislation. The second is to insist on the combination of prior review and ex post examination in order to minimize the negative impact of monopoly tying exemption.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】