知识产权人停止侵害请求权的限制

发布时间：2018-07-21 20:05

【摘要】：知识产权是通过法律对他人行为进行人为制约的一种特权,其权利边界的模糊性导致完全适用财产规则并非有效率;加上知识产权法又是竞争法体系中的一环,当因知识产权排他权的过度行使导致有损竞争的非效率性情形发生时,就有必要对知识产权的排他性进行限制。但现有限制知识产权排他性的方法无法应对侵权行为发生后的情形,因此事后通过限制知识产权人的停止侵害请求权就成为必要。在我国限制停止侵害请求权可采取以下思路,即由司法机关分别对个人利益之间的平衡以及个人利益与公共利益之间的平衡进行综合考量,并根据不同产业领域对排他性救济方式的不同诉求,灵活把握对知识产权人停止侵害请求权限制标准的严格程度。具体而言,在对是否限制知识产权人的停止侵害请求权进行考量时,应考虑当事人之间的关系、市场因素、原被告的具体情况、公共利益等。在知识产权侵权诉讼中,当法院否定停止侵害请求权的情况下,必要时以替代性补偿金对权利人进行补偿,法院可依据自由裁量判令几倍于正常许可费的补偿金。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property is a privilege to impose artificial restrictions on the conduct of others through law, and the ambiguity of its boundaries of rights makes the full application of property rules not efficient; in addition, intellectual property law is a part of the system of competition law. It is necessary to restrict the exclusivity of intellectual property rights when the excessive exercise of exclusive rights of intellectual property rights leads to the occurrence of inefficiency that impairs competition. However, the existing methods to restrict the exclusiveness of intellectual property can not cope with the situation after the infringement, so it is necessary to restrict the intellectual property owner's right to stop infringing. In our country, we can take the following thinking to limit the right to stop infringing, that is, the balance between personal interests and public interests is considered by the judicial organs. And according to the different demands of exclusive relief in different industrial fields, the strict degree of limitation standard for IPR to stop infringing claims should be grasped flexibly. In particular, when considering whether or not to restrict the IPR's right to stop infringing, we should consider the relationship between the parties, market factors, the specific circumstances of the original defendant, the public interest and so on. In intellectual property infringement litigation, when the court denies the right to stop infringing the claim, the court can compensate the obligee with the substitute compensation when necessary, and the court can order the compensation several times the normal license fee according to the discretion.
【作者单位】：深圳大学法学院;日本北海道大学;
【基金】：国家留学基金资助
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】