信息网络传播权视野中的网络服务提供者间接侵权问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-04 17:36

【摘要】：随着网络和网络信息传播的快速发展，互联网传输作为一种全新的作品（信息）传播方式，给社会公众带来前所未有的便利。但是相对的，电子化的作品（信息）与国际互联网给权利人带来的却是种种忧虑。在如今的作品（信息）传播渠道上，互联网已成为当之无愧的主力军，互联网著作权侵权事件频繁发生。世界范围上看，网络著作权侵权问题已成为网络法律发展进程中的目标性难题，而网络服务提供者（Internet Service provider，以下简称“ISP”）间接侵权责任制度的建立和完善则是互联网著作权侵权的关键性问题。因此，适时适当加强互联网和数字环境下ISP、著作权人和社会公众利益的平衡，规范作品等在互联网上的传播行为的任务显得十分突出。有关信息网络传播权保护的课题近年来一直是知识产权学者研究的热点，这一方面源于司法实践的迫切需要，另一方面则在于我国此方面立法几乎处于空白状态，尽管2012年底公布的《最高人民法院关于审理侵害信息网络传播权民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》（以下简称“2012年《司法解释》”）很大程度上促进了妨害该专有权利责任追究立法上的完善。但本质而言，，我国对信息网络传播权保护的理论研究仍然相对落后，法律适用也不够明确，这导致司法实践中同案不同判现象严重，判决结果具有很强的不确定性，影响我国司法的权威。本文以提供技术设备服务的ISP侵犯著作权人、邻接权人信息网络传播权所承担的间接侵权责任为研究对象，通过对美国ISP间接侵权司法实践，特别是立法实践的总结和借鉴，希望能为我国ISP间接侵权责任制度的构建和完善提供可行的理论支持，进而为我国的地方司法实践提供审判依据，为相关行为人提供行动指南。本文从以下四部分进行论述：第一部分为ISP信息网络传播权间接侵权概述。本部分首先介绍了ISP的概念和我国立法、学术界对ISP类型的划分；其次，归纳总结信息网络传播权的概念、特点和构成要素；再次，阐述ISP间接侵权的基本概念并详细介绍ISP间接侵权的三个特征。第二部分从网络发达国家美国的司法实践及立法经验分析介绍ISP信息网络传播权间接侵权的发展及认定。美国作为典型的英美法系国家代表，其版权法中关于间接侵权责任的认定绝大多数是通过法院判例确定下来的。本部分通过对美国ISP间接侵权立法实践，特别是司法实践的总结，详细针对帮助侵权责任、替代责任、索尼规则、引诱侵权规则、避风港条款、通知删除程序等重要制度进行系统论述，该部分论述实际上贯穿的是美国ISP间接侵权主观认知要件理论的发展和完善。第三部分从我国司法实践和目前的立法方面对ISP间接侵权责任进行考察。第四部分为我国ISP间接侵权的评析和完善建议。该部分为本文重点部分，通过前面三部分的论述，对我国理论研究和立法进行分析，并从六个方面提出完善我国ISP间接侵权制度的建议，包括：完善教唆侵权要件；正确理解直接经济利益；细化及完善避风港规则；明确帮助侵权和教唆侵权责任的独立性；确立ISP著作权领域内法律地位；提高信息网络传播权保护位阶。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network and network information transmission, Internet transmission, as a new type of work (information), brings unprecedented convenience to the public. However, the relative, electronic works (information) and the Internet bring all sorts of worries to the right people. The Internet has become a well deserved main force, and Internet copyright infringement incidents occur frequently. In the world, the problem of network copyright infringement has become a goal problem in the development process of network law, and the establishment and completion of the indirect tort liability system of network service provider (Internet Service provider, hereinafter referred to as "ISP") Good is the key issue of copyright infringement in the Internet. Therefore, it is very important to properly strengthen the balance of the interests of the copyright owners and the public in the Internet and digital environment, and to standardize the communication of the works on the Internet, such as the Internet and the digital environment, ISP.
The issue of the protection of the right of information network communication has been a hot topic of intellectual property scholars in recent years. This aspect is due to the urgent need of judicial practice. On the other hand, the legislation in this aspect is almost blank in our country, although the Supreme People's Law Institute announced at the end of 2012 the civil correction of the infringement of the right to infringe the information network. The provisions of a number of legal issues applicable to various cases (hereinafter referred to as "2012 < judicial interpretation") greatly promote the legislative improvement of the liability for obstruction of the exclusive right. However, in essence, the theoretical research on the protection of the right to communication of information network is still relatively backward and the application of the law is not clear enough, which leads to the judicial practice. The different cases of the same case are serious, and the verdict is very uncertain, which affects the authority of our judiciary.
This article is based on the ISP infringement of the copyright owner and the indirect infringement of the right to communication of the neighboring rights. Through the summary and reference of the judicial practice of indirect infringement of ISP in the United States, especially the legislative practice, it is hoped that it can provide a feasible way for the construction and improvement of the indirect tort liability system of ISP in China. Theory support, and then for the local judicial practice in our country to provide trial basis, provide action guide for the relevant actors. This article from the following four parts: the first part is the ISP information network communication right indirect infringement overview. This part first introduces the concept of ISP and our national law, the academic circle of ISP type division; secondly, return to the The concept, characteristics and elements of the right of information network communication are summed up. Again, the basic concept of ISP indirect infringement is expounded and the three characteristics of indirect infringement of ISP are introduced in detail. The second part introduces the development and identification of the indirect infringement of the right of communication of the ISP information network from the United States' judicial practice and legislative experience in the developed countries of the network. As a typical representative of the Anglo American legal system, the overwhelming majority of its copyright law on indirect tort liability is determined by the case of the court. Through the summary of the legislative practice of indirect infringement of ISP in the United States, especially the summary of judicial practice, this part is aimed at helping the tort liability, the replacement responsibility, the SONY rule, the temptation of the tort rules, and the avoidance of the wind. The third part of the third part examines the indirect tort liability of ISP from the judicial practice and current legislation in our country. The fourth part is the evaluation of the indirect infringement of ISP in China. This part is the key part of this article. Through the discussion of the previous three parts, this part analyses the theoretical research and legislation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the indirect infringement system of ISP in our country from six aspects, including: perfecting the instigation elements of tort, correct understanding of the direct economic benefits, refining and perfecting the rules of the haven; and To help the independence of tort liability and instigation of tort liability; to establish the legal status in the field of ISP copyright; to improve the protection of information network dissemination right.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.41

【共引文献】