网络环境下临时复制问题法律研究
发布时间：2019-01-22 14:05
【摘要】：复制权是著作权人享有的基础性著作财产权，也是经济权利中最早的权利。网络技术的飞速发展在给我国经济带来新的增长契机的同时，也给我国的法律特别是著作权法带来了巨大的冲击。因为网络以其可以提供超常规模的信息资源，极强渗透能力的信息复制与传播设施，以复制行为的普遍性、复制效果的逼真性、传播的高速性以及成本的低廉性，成为世界上最大的复制设备。面对新技术给知识产权法律制度提出的挑战，如何一方面实现知识尽可能造福于社会公众的宗旨，另一方面又能最大程度的为创造者提供激励，将成为网络世界里一个很大的难题。 本文由有关临时复制的一个案例——腾讯诉王友金、淘宝网著作权纠纷案谈起，拟对临时复制和传统复制进行客观比对，探讨临时复制是否应归结为传统复制范围；其次结合与临时复制相关的国际和地区立法现状和背景，从公众合理使用、著作权人对临时复制的控制方式及其有限性等方面进行了论述；最后本文对我国立法提出相应的对策建议，，认为我国著作权法应当对临时复制问题进行明确，以实现著作权保护与信息网络流通的平衡。 本文共分三章。第一章概述了临时复制的概念、特征及其与传统复制的比较，得出其是否属于传统复制。第二章提出了国际上关于临时复制的立法分析，列举了欧盟、美国以及加拿大等国的立法情况及探讨立法背后的经济动因。第三章着重分析了我国现阶段有关临时复制立法的情况并提出了对临时复制的立法对策的建议。
[Abstract]:The right of reproduction is the fundamental property right of copyright owner and the earliest right of economic right. The rapid development of network technology not only brings a new opportunity for the growth of our economy, but also brings a huge impact to our country's law, especially the copyright law. Because the network can provide extraordinary scale information resources, highly permeable information replication and dissemination facilities, in order to copy the universality of the behavior, reproduction effect lifelike, high speed of transmission and low cost, To become the world's largest replicator. In the face of the challenges posed by new technologies to the intellectual property legal system, on the one hand, how to achieve the goal of maximizing the benefits of knowledge for the public, on the other hand, to provide the greatest extent of incentives for creators, Will become a very big problem in the network world. In this paper, a case about temporary reproduction-Tencent v. Wang Youjin, Taobao copyright dispute case, to compare the temporary copy with the traditional copy objectively, to explore whether the temporary copy should be reduced to the scope of the traditional copy; Secondly, combining with the current situation and background of international and regional legislation related to temporary reproduction, this paper discusses the reasonable use of the public, the control mode of the copyright owner to the temporary copy and its limitation, and so on. Finally, this paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions to the legislation of our country, and holds that China's copyright law should make clear the issue of temporary reproduction in order to achieve the balance between copyright protection and the circulation of information network. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter summarizes the concept of temporary replication, its characteristics and its comparison with traditional replication, and gets whether it belongs to traditional replication. The second chapter puts forward the international legislation analysis about temporary replication, lists the legislation situation of EU, USA and Canada, and probes into the economic motivation behind the legislation. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the current situation of temporary replication legislation in our country and puts forward some suggestions on the legislative countermeasures of temporary replication.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
本文编号：2413282
[Abstract]:The right of reproduction is the fundamental property right of copyright owner and the earliest right of economic right. The rapid development of network technology not only brings a new opportunity for the growth of our economy, but also brings a huge impact to our country's law, especially the copyright law. Because the network can provide extraordinary scale information resources, highly permeable information replication and dissemination facilities, in order to copy the universality of the behavior, reproduction effect lifelike, high speed of transmission and low cost, To become the world's largest replicator. In the face of the challenges posed by new technologies to the intellectual property legal system, on the one hand, how to achieve the goal of maximizing the benefits of knowledge for the public, on the other hand, to provide the greatest extent of incentives for creators, Will become a very big problem in the network world. In this paper, a case about temporary reproduction-Tencent v. Wang Youjin, Taobao copyright dispute case, to compare the temporary copy with the traditional copy objectively, to explore whether the temporary copy should be reduced to the scope of the traditional copy; Secondly, combining with the current situation and background of international and regional legislation related to temporary reproduction, this paper discusses the reasonable use of the public, the control mode of the copyright owner to the temporary copy and its limitation, and so on. Finally, this paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions to the legislation of our country, and holds that China's copyright law should make clear the issue of temporary reproduction in order to achieve the balance between copyright protection and the circulation of information network. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter summarizes the concept of temporary replication, its characteristics and its comparison with traditional replication, and gets whether it belongs to traditional replication. The second chapter puts forward the international legislation analysis about temporary replication, lists the legislation situation of EU, USA and Canada, and probes into the economic motivation behind the legislation. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the current situation of temporary replication legislation in our country and puts forward some suggestions on the legislative countermeasures of temporary replication.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐广良;网络环境下著作权保护的几个问题[J];国家图书馆学刊;2004年04期
2 蔡仁鲁;林先海;;关于我国“临时复制”行为的法律心理学思考[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2011年11期
3 杨异;吴蕾;;网络环境下临时复制的法律界定[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2008年12期
4 朱理;;临时复制是否属于著作权法意义上的复制——以国际公约为核心的规范分析[J];电子知识产权;2007年01期
5 易健雄;蒲奕;;版权的未来[J];电子知识产权;2009年01期
6 罗胜华;;侵害知识产权行为的过滤判定[J];法律适用;2011年11期
7 郭禾;;信息高速公路对著作权制度的影响[J];法学家;1997年02期
8 何炼红,阳东辉;著作人身权合理使用制度研究[J];法学评论;2004年01期
9 王迁;;转让QQ号码在著作权法中的定性——兼评“腾讯公司诉王友金、淘宝公司案”[J];法学;2009年10期
10 邹杰;薛嘉钰;;如何看待临时复制[J];消费导刊;2008年06期
本文编号：2413282
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2413282.html
