普通高校机关职能部门与政府、企业绩效管理的差异性研究
本文关键词:普通高校机关职能部门与政府、企业绩效管理的差异性研究 出处:《电子科技大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着市场经济的高速发展,人才成为衡量各国综合实力的重要标志。作为培育优质人才的基地,高校在社会经济体系中的作用日益凸显。高校机关职能部门作为高校的重要组成部分,其管理水平和运行效率会对高校教学、科研及人才培养质量产生重要影响,,开展高校机关职能部门的绩效管理研究不仅必要而且意义重大。同时,在总结国内外学者的研究成果的基础上我们可以发现,目前高校机关职能部门的绩效管理还属于高校管理的薄弱环节,部分高校没有建立专门的职能部门绩效管理制度,部分建立的高校也存在盲目照搬照抄企业管理制度和方法的现象,且存在如下问题:绩效考核标准的科学性不足;考核指标的量化程度低,差异性不明显;绩效沟通和反馈不足;绩效考核结果使用不当等。 本文主要采用比较研究法和多学科知识分析法,择取高校机关职能部门绩效管理差异性为主要研究内容,首先简要介绍高校机关职能部门绩效管理的内涵和作用,阐述新公共管理理论、公共人事管理理论、利益相关者理论等和介绍主要的绩效管理方法,为论文的阐述提供理论依据和方法论指导。其次,梳理高校机关职能部门自身的工作特点,从绩效管理目标、价值取向、考核重点等不同维度系统分析高校职能部门绩效管理与企业、政府绩效管理之间差异的具体表现。最后,在分析高校职能部门绩效管理存在的主要问题基础上,基于差异性分析提出高校机关职能部门绩效管理改进的具体对策。 本文的创新点主要在于阐述和分析了高校机关职能部门和企业、政府绩效管理差异性的具体表现和成因;同时,在建立基于平衡计分卡理论的企业和政府共性绩效考评指标体系的基础上,通过对其指标的科学删减和增加,构建起适用于高校机关职能部门的绩效考评指标体系。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of market economy, talents have become an important symbol to measure the comprehensive strength of various countries. Colleges and universities play an increasingly important role in the social and economic system. As an important part of colleges and universities, the management level and operational efficiency of the functional departments of institutions of higher learning will contribute to the teaching of colleges and universities. The quality of scientific research and talent training has an important impact. It is not only necessary but also significant to carry out the research on the performance management of the functional departments of institutions of higher learning. On the basis of summing up the research results of scholars at home and abroad, we can find that the performance management of the functional departments of institutions of higher learning is still a weak link in the management of colleges and universities. Some colleges and universities have not established a special performance management system of functional departments, and some universities have blindly copied the enterprise management system and methods. And has the following problems: the performance appraisal standard is not scientific enough; The quantitative degree of the assessment index is low and the difference is not obvious; Inadequate performance communication and feedback; Improper use of performance appraisal results, etc. This article mainly uses the comparative research method and the multi-disciplinary knowledge analysis method, chooses the university organ function department performance management difference as the main research content. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the connotation and function of the performance management of the functional departments of university, expounds the new public management theory, the public personnel management theory, the stakeholder theory, and introduces the main performance management methods. To provide theoretical basis and methodological guidance for the elaboration of the paper. Secondly, combing the work characteristics of the functional departments of institutions of higher learning, from the performance management objectives, value orientation. This paper systematically analyzes the concrete performance of the difference between the performance management of the university functional department and the enterprise and the government performance management. Finally, on the basis of the analysis of the main problems existing in the performance management of the functional department of the university. Based on the difference analysis, the paper puts forward the concrete countermeasures to improve the performance management of the functional department of the university. The innovation of this paper mainly lies in expounding and analyzing the concrete manifestation and cause of the difference of the government performance management between the functional departments and enterprises of the institutions of higher learning. At the same time, based on the balanced Scorecard theory, the common performance evaluation index system of enterprises and governments is established, through the scientific deletion and increase of the indicators. Set up the performance evaluation index system which is suitable for the functional departments of the institutions of higher learning.
【学位授予单位】:电子科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D630;G647.1;F272
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张涛;;高校教师绩效管理:问题与对策[J];高教论坛;2008年05期
2 李壮晖;肖仲思;;高校行政人员的绩效考核及其优化[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2009年06期
3 邓维敏;谭建伟;任凌婕;;高等院校职能管理部门的绩效考核问题[J];重庆与世界(学术版);2012年05期
4 程卓蕾;胡振华;刘文斌;;利益相关者理论在高校绩效管理中的应用研究[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
5 岳金燕;金水英;;基于平衡计分卡的企业绩效评价体系的构建[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2011年09期
6 王洪;;高校机关职能部门功能的思考[J];安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
7 张金环;张杰;;试析平衡计分卡在高校部门绩效管理中的应用[J];经济与管理;2010年05期
8 周艺勇;;高职院校职能部门整体绩效考核初探[J];济南职业学院学报;2009年04期
9 程国方;石贵舟;;绩效管理视域下的高校管理创新研究[J];江苏高教;2012年02期
10 张明;;政府、企业和非营利组织治理机制的比较分析[J];科技管理研究;2008年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 程卓蕾;高校绩效管理体系的研究与设计[D];中南大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 郭然;高校行政管理部门绩效管理研究[D];河北工业大学;2006年
2 曾莉;基于平衡计分卡的企业核心能力评价指标体系研究[D];四川大学;2007年
3 巩丽娟;基于平衡计分卡的公共部门绩效评价指标体系研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2008年
4 郝欣冬;烟台龙源公司研发项目绩效管理体系设计与应用研究[D];华北电力大学(北京);2010年
本文编号:1425140
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/1425140.html