我国城市公共道路资源有偿冠名规范研究

发布时间：2018-02-04 22:42

本文关键词： 公共道路公物产权有偿冠名规制建议　出处：《东北财经大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中纪委在向党的十八大所做的报告中重点提到：我国在由传统的权力型政府向服务型政府的转型过程中,要大力推进城市公共资源的市场化配置。其中,城市公共道路资源有偿冠名就是在这种新的背景下产生的政府行为,它是政府尝试用市场化的手段配置公共资源的新方法。比较著名的事件有武汉市2006年颁布的加强地名管理通知中明确提出允许企业有偿冠名。青岛海尔集团在青岛市、重庆市、遵义市等多个城市冠名“海尔路”和“海尔大道”。甚至伴随着其海外业务的拓展,还获得了国外道路的冠名权。长春市有纵贯南北的主干道“亚泰大街,,和东西主干道“皓月大路”等等。对于这些企业路的大量出现当地市民纷纷表示不理解和激烈的反对。认为自己在毫不知情的情况下被新的路名扰乱了正常的生活秩序,并质疑政府在获得了企业天价冠名费后相关信息不公开的行为。学术界也对此意见不一,有的认为这种方式是不合法的,因为国家法规中没有提到城市道路是可以被冠名的。有的则认为这种方式能够拓宽城市建设的资金渠道,弥补城市投入不足,是提高城市管理水平和公共服务质量的好办法。无论哪种说法是正确的,民众在此事件中的重要地位被地方政府忽略了确是不争的事实。笔者参考了大量相关资料后认为政府将城市道路的冠名权进行有偿转让,不仅使道路名称这种公物的无形资产价值有形化,更符合我国今后要更多地用市场化改革公共资源配置方式的思想。如果在通过论证这项政府行为的合理性与合法性,分析现存的问题后综合各方面因素和基础上,总结并给出一个统一规范的规制建议。必将对这项工作的完善起到极大的作用,使其可持续发展,最终达到公共利益与个人利益双赢的局面。因此本文将从公共管理理论依据、我国行政法规依据和产权理论依据三大角度来阐明道路有偿冠名的合理性和合法性,结合实例深入分析目前我国城市道路冠名存在的问题并提出相应的规制建议,从制度和法律的建设和完善角度对问题进行研究。政府的任何一种行政行为必须是合理合法的,所以本文第二章主要从西方公共管理理论思想和我国行政法规依据这两个角度阐述了城市公共道路资源有偿冠名的合理性与合法性。第三章主要介绍了当前我国各地方政府在道路冠名权转让过程中的实际操作情况和用公物产权理论理解道路冠名存在的实际意义最后总结出了其中存在的问题。根据问题的提出在第四章从法律和制度两方面提出了对国家层面和政府层面的详细要求并提出了七条富有建设性和实效性的规制建议。其中运用的研究方法主要有文献研究法,跨学科研究法和个案研究法。经过详细的论证和分析最终得出结论。即在不损失文化和经济利益的条件下、在人民群众的监督和同意下、在有效合法的行政制度的监管和约束下,我国城市公共道路资源有偿冠名可以良性发展,并使公共行政效率得到提高。
[Abstract]:The Commission to the party's eighteen made the report highlighted: China in the process of transition from traditional power of the government to service government, market allocation of public resources to vigorously promote the city. Among them, the government behavior of city public roads resources paid title is generated in this new context it is a new method, means of allocation of public resources by government attempts to market the more famous events. Strengthen the management of geographical names in Wuhan city in 2006 promulgated the notice clearly allows companies paid title. Qingdao Haier group in Qingdao City, Chongqing City, a city of Zunyi City, the title "Haier road and Haier road" even with its overseas business expansion, also won the foreign road naming rights. Changchun city main road "runs north-south and east-west trunk, Yatai street," Haoyue road "and so on.
For the emergence of a large number of local residents of these companies have said they did not understand the road and fierce opposition. Consider themselves to be the case without the knowledge of new road to disrupt the normal order of life, and questioned the government in obtaining a business after naming right price related information is not public behavior. The academic circles also have different views on this, some think this approach is not legitimate, because the state regulations are not mentioned in the city the title of the road can be. Others believe that this approach can broaden the channels of city construction funds to compensate for inadequate investment in the city, is a good way to improve the city management level and quality of public service. No matter what kind of argument is correct, the important position of people in this event ignored by the local government is an indisputable fact. The author believe that the government will City Road naming rights paid to So, not only the value of intangible assets tangible property, the name of the road, more in line with our more market-oriented reform of public resource allocation. If the legitimacy and rationality of demonstrating the behavior of the government, after analyzing the existing problems of various factors and basis, and summarized the a standardized regulation will improve suggestions. For this work play a significant role in the sustainable development, and ultimately achieve the public interests and personal interests of the win-win situation.
This article from the public management theory, administrative rules and regulations of our country on the basis of theory and property rights perspective to clarify the three road paid rationality and legitimacy of the title, with examples of in-depth analysis of the current city road naming problems and puts forward the corresponding suggestions on the issue of regulation, from the construction and perfection of the legal system and angle. Any kind of government administrative act must be reasonable and legitimate, so in the second chapter, mainly from the thought of western public management theory and administrative regulations based on these two aspects of rationality and legitimacy of public resources paid Title Road city road. The third chapter mainly introduces the actual operation situation of China's current local the government in the transfer of road naming rights in the process of understanding and use of public property rights theory practical road naming existence and finally summed up the existence of the The problem. According to the issues raised in the fourth chapter from the two aspects of the legal system and put forward the detailed requirements on the national level and the government level and put forward seven suggestions constructive and effective. The research methods include literature research method, interdisciplinary research method and case study method. Through the demonstration and a detailed analysis of the final conclusion. That is the loss of cultural and economic benefits under the conditions in the supervision of the people agreed, in the effective supervision and restriction of administrative legal system, our country city public resources paid title of benign development, and make public administration more efficient.

【学位授予单位】：东北财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】