我国乡镇政府绩效评估中公众参与问题研究
发布时间:2018-05-15 18:13
本文选题:乡镇政府 + 绩效评估 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:政府绩效评估最早始于英国,在美国得到大力发展。随着新公共管理运动的开展,现代政府管理越来越重视社会和公民的作用,越来越多的社会组织和公众参与到政府管理活动中来。公众参与政府绩效评估正是在这种趋势下得到不断发展和深入。 进入21世纪,我国政府行政理念发生了很大的变化,从以前的管制型政府到管理型政府再到服务型政府。为了适应这种变化,政府需要引入公众参与到行政活动中来,公众参与政府绩效评估也就应运而生。公众参与政府绩效评估能够达到表达自己意见、维护自身利益、改进政府服务、提高政府效能、发展民主行政的目的。 公众参与乡镇政府绩效评估是在我国绩效评估实践和理论发展到一定阶段而产生的。它是我国落实基层自治,农民实现参政议政的有力工具。当前,在我国乡镇政府绩效评估中多是对上负责、对领导负责、以GDP为主的考核方式没有得到根本性的转变。公众参与乡镇政府绩效评估还存在着公民参与意识差、参与能力欠缺、评估过程不规范、信息缺乏透明、评估结果作用有限等问题。为了解决这些问题,在借鉴英美发达国家公众参与政府绩效评估的有益经验的基础上,结合我国乡镇政府绩效评估的实情,提出我国乡镇政府绩效评估中公众参与问题需要从评估主体、被评估者、法律法规和绩效评估机制体系四个方面进行解决的建议。
[Abstract]:Government performance evaluation began in Britain and developed vigorously in the United States. With the development of the new public management movement, modern government management pays more and more attention to the role of society and citizens, and more social organizations and the public participate in the government management activities. Public participation in government performance evaluation is under this trend to be constantly developed and in-depth. In the 21st century, great changes have taken place in the concept of government administration in our country, from the former regulatory government to the management-oriented government and then to the service-oriented government. In order to adapt to this change, the government needs to introduce public participation in administrative activities, public participation in government performance evaluation also came into being. Public participation in government performance evaluation can achieve the purpose of expressing opinions, safeguarding their own interests, improving government services, improving government effectiveness and developing democratic administration. Public participation in the performance evaluation of township government comes into being at a certain stage in the practice and theory of performance evaluation in China. It is a powerful tool for our country to implement basic-level autonomy and farmers to participate in political affairs. At present, in the performance evaluation of township government in our country, most of them are responsible to the leaders, but the assessment method based on GDP has not been fundamentally changed. There are still some problems in public participation in township government performance evaluation, such as poor citizen participation consciousness, lack of participation ability, non-standard evaluation process, lack of transparency of information, limited function of evaluation results, etc. In order to solve these problems, on the basis of drawing lessons from the beneficial experience of public participation in government performance evaluation in Anglo-American developed countries, combined with the actual situation of township government performance evaluation in China, This paper puts forward some suggestions to solve the problem of public participation in the performance evaluation of township government from four aspects: the subject, the person to be evaluated, the laws and regulations, and the system of performance evaluation mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D621.5;D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王建民;美国地方政府绩效考评:实践与经验——以弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯县为例[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2005年05期
2 石佑启;;论法治视野下行政管理方式的创新[J];广东社会科学;2009年06期
3 鲁华君;陈学群;;科学发展观视野下乡镇政府绩效评价科学化的探索——以富阳市乡镇分类考核制度为例[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2009年04期
4 彭国甫;盛明科;;政府绩效评估指标体系三维立体逻辑框架的结构与运用研究[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
5 毛寿龙;陈小华;;政府绩效评估中公众参与的限度及超越[J];理论探讨;2011年01期
6 胡正昌;;公共治理理论及其政府治理模式的转变[J];前沿;2008年05期
7 吕承文;邓建华;;公众参与视角下地方政府绩效评估重塑之思考[J];山东行政学院学报;2011年06期
8 王锡锌;;公众参与、专业知识与政府绩效评估的模式——探寻政府绩效评估模式的一个分析框架[J];法制与社会发展;2008年06期
9 焦璞润;;优化对政府绩效评估结果的利用与管理[J];山东省农业管理干部学院学报;2008年05期
10 朱德米;;回顾公民参与研究[J];同济大学学报(社会科学版);2009年06期
,本文编号:1893381
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/1893381.html