现代民主治理中的问责期望管理与问责动力分析
发布时间：2018-11-13 12:41
【摘要】：问责作为现代民主治理的标志和公共管理中的核心概念,近年来越来越受到国内学术界的广泛关注并成为研究的热点领域。通过对现实的考察可以发现,问责在实践过程中存在着问责期望不断提高与问责效果持续乏力的矛盾,其根本原因在于问责动力缺失。根据问责理论的最新发展,文章首先识别出问责研究的两种范式,并从类型学的角度对问责期望管理范式进行分析;然后借助组织行为学的期望理论,构建起一个问责动力的理论框架,并根据这一框架对不同问责类型的动力来源进行比较分析。从规范层面来讲,问责动力来源于问责效价、问责期望和问责手段三者之间的结合,问责主体是否启动问责取决于问责主客体之间的力量博弈。
[Abstract]:Accountability, as the symbol of modern democratic governance and the core concept of public administration, has attracted more and more attention from domestic academic circles in recent years and has become a hot research field. Through the investigation of the reality, it can be found that there is a contradiction between the continuous improvement of accountability expectations and the persistent weakness of the effect of accountability in the process of practice, and the fundamental reason lies in the lack of accountability motivation. According to the latest development of accountability theory, this paper first identifies two paradigms of accountability research, and analyzes accountability expectation management paradigm from the perspective of typology. Then, with the expectation theory of organizational behavior, we construct a theoretical framework of accountability motivation, and compare and analyze the power sources of different types of accountability according to this framework. From the normative aspect, the motivation of accountability comes from the combination of accountability efficiency, accountability expectation and accountability means, and whether the accountability subject initiates accountability depends on the power game between the subject and object of accountability.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学公共管理学院;长沙学院法学与公共管理系;
【基金】：教育部人文社科规划项目“党政领导干部问责制研究”(10YJA810028) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“非选举政治下的决策问责制研究”(12YJC810014)
【分类号】：D035
本文编号：2329134
[Abstract]:Accountability, as the symbol of modern democratic governance and the core concept of public administration, has attracted more and more attention from domestic academic circles in recent years and has become a hot research field. Through the investigation of the reality, it can be found that there is a contradiction between the continuous improvement of accountability expectations and the persistent weakness of the effect of accountability in the process of practice, and the fundamental reason lies in the lack of accountability motivation. According to the latest development of accountability theory, this paper first identifies two paradigms of accountability research, and analyzes accountability expectation management paradigm from the perspective of typology. Then, with the expectation theory of organizational behavior, we construct a theoretical framework of accountability motivation, and compare and analyze the power sources of different types of accountability according to this framework. From the normative aspect, the motivation of accountability comes from the combination of accountability efficiency, accountability expectation and accountability means, and whether the accountability subject initiates accountability depends on the power game between the subject and object of accountability.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学公共管理学院;长沙学院法学与公共管理系;
【基金】：教育部人文社科规划项目“党政领导干部问责制研究”(10YJA810028) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“非选举政治下的决策问责制研究”(12YJC810014)
【分类号】：D035
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 宋涛;;我国行政等级问责发展特点及成效研究——基于2003-2009年等级问责事件的定量统计分析[J];公共管理研究;2010年00期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 谷志军;王柳;;中西不同政治生态中的问责研究述评[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2013年02期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孟卫东;付治国;颜廷旭;;浅议政治管理的激励机制[J];重庆三峡学院学报;2006年02期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李春阁;政府信息公开的动力机制研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 胡润林;“问责”制度化与行政人伦理自主[D];四川师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2329134
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2329134.html
