当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 公共管理论文 >

行政约谈的法律认定

发布时间:2018-12-08 12:02
【摘要】:随着全球化与信息化的发展,社会分工日渐精细化、复杂化,给社会治理带来了前所未有的挑战。与之相悖,“传送带式”的传统行政管理模式之积弊日渐凸显,不再能满足社会发展的需要。历经传统公共行政理论、新公共管理理论、新公共服务理论等理论的变迁,行政约谈作为非正式执法方式的代表,成为治国理政的新攻略。通过对相关文件的梳理,不难发现,行政约谈旨在通过协商对话的方式引导行政相对人改正明显不当或违法性难以界定的行为,能有效地规避官民冲突,节约执法成本,达到“力挽狂澜”的效果。然而,作为新兴事务,对行政约谈进行正本清源绝非易事。目前,关于行政约谈性质认定的观点共有六种,有些人试图通过创建新理论对其进行法律认定。殊不知,新理论的构建“牵一发而动全身”,纯粹为了学术创新而打乱成熟的行政法理论体系,是理论研究中的一种方向性错误。因此,厘清行政约谈的性质,刻不容缓,实为必要。本文共包括四个部分。第一章,旨在阐述行政约谈的概念和产生背景,通过对相关规范性文件的分析概括其基本含义,并对其产生的理论背景如新公共管理理论、新公共服务理论等进行梳理。第二章对有关行政约谈的法律和一些部门规章的规定进行了分析,对行政约谈的适用情形进行了概括总结。第三章,首先对有关行政约谈性质认定的观点进行了概括总结,然后对这些观点进行评价,并在此基础上阐述自己的观点,将行政约谈认定为行政指导的一种方式。第四章,以行政约谈纷繁复杂的实践乱象为立论背景,透过现象看本质,将行政约谈与行政指导、责令改正、警告进行对比分析,并对它们之间的关系处理提出一己之见。
[Abstract]:With the development of globalization and information, the social division of labor becomes more and more sophisticated, which brings unprecedented challenges to social governance. Contrary to this, the traditional administration mode of "conveyor belt" is becoming more and more obvious and can no longer meet the needs of social development. After the changes of traditional public administration theory, new public management theory and new public service theory, administrative interview, as the representative of informal law enforcement, has become a new strategy of governance. Through combing the relevant documents, it is not difficult to find that the administrative interview aims to guide the administrative counterpart to correct the obviously improper or illegal behavior by means of consultation and dialogue, which can effectively avoid the conflicts between the officials and the people, and save the cost of enforcing the law. Achieve the effect of "trying to turn the tide". However, as a new business, administrative interviews are no easy task. At present, there are six views on the nature of administrative interview, some people try to establish a new theory to determine the nature of administrative interviews. However, it is a kind of directional mistake in the theoretical research that the construction of the new theory "moves the whole body with one hair" and disrupts the mature administrative law theory system purely for the sake of academic innovation. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to clarify the nature of administrative interview. This paper consists of four parts. The first chapter is aimed at explaining the concept and background of administrative interview, summarizing its basic meaning through the analysis of relevant normative documents, and combing its theoretical background such as the theory of new public management and the theory of new public service. The second chapter analyzes the laws and regulations of administrative interview and summarizes the application of administrative interview. In the third chapter, the author summarizes the views about the nature of administrative interview, and then evaluates these views, and on the basis of this, expounds his own views, and regards the administrative interview as a way of administrative guidance. The fourth chapter takes the complicated practice of administrative interview as the theoretical background, through the phenomenon to see the essence, administrative interview and administrative guidance, order correction, warning for comparative analysis, and put forward their own views on the handling of the relationship between them.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 郑毅;;现代行政法视野下的约谈——从价格约谈说起[J];行政法学研究;2012年04期

2 胡建淼,王银江;现代行政视野中的事实行为——行政环境、蕴含与诉讼[J];行政法学研究;2003年01期

3 杨立宪;论行政事实行为的界定[J];行政法学研究;2001年01期

4 杨绍东;论可诉性行政事实行为[J];人民司法;1997年08期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 冯竹云;;食品安全行政约谈存在问题及改进方法[N];江苏经济报;2012年

2 宋玉池;;行政约谈:解决消费争议的一项好制度[N];中国工商报;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 丁丹丹;我国行政约谈行为初探[D];安徽大学;2012年



本文编号:2368312

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2368312.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d29d0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com