发电行业放松管制研究
发布时间：2018-12-13 00:19
【摘要】：目前,发电行业受到政府管制所引发的矛盾不断凸显,政府管制改革正向深水区迈进。但是,发电行业政府管制改革是一项涉及面广、内容繁多、程序复杂的系统工程,改革的进程显得异常艰难,改革的结果褒贬不一。在此背景下,本文以放松管制作为切入点,试图证明,放松管制的过程是发电行业市场活力增强、产业结构优化、产出绩效提高的过程。本文在回顾发电行业放松管制改革历程的基础上,从公共管理的视角,以产权管制理论为依据,从政府对发电行业放松管制的原因、过程和绩效三个层面,构建了一个“交易费用—放松管制—制度绩效”的解析模型,这一理论模型说明发电行业的放松管制可以有效节约交易费用,进而提高发电行业放松管制的制度绩效。围绕这一理论模型,以广东粤电集团为案例进行了实证分析,以此呈现出放松管制对政府管制失灵的纠正过程,进而提出了完善发电行业放松管制的对策建议,为我国的发电行业改革提供充实的理论依据。其基本结论如下:第一,我国对发电行业的放松管制进行了四个阶段的改革,每一个阶段的放松管制,都是步履蹒跚,有得有失,取得的成效并不一致。当前已经进入新的改革时期,这一时期的改革必然是进一步放松对发电行业的管制,构建充分的发电市场竞争格局。第二,节约交易费用是政府放松发电行业管制的初始动因。政府管制导致发电行业的公共领域租金耗散严重,增加了内生性交易费用。放松管制过程是一个内生性交易费用递减从而制度绩效递增的过程。发电行业的放松管制,一方面使政府节约了管制的成本,另一方面,让发电企业以更加灵活和多样的方式实现增长。广东粤电集团的改革历程进一步证明,发电行业管制不断放松是一个管制成本不断降低而制度绩效不断增加的动态过程。第三,国外发电行业放松管制的经验表明:改革要以法制作保障,放松管制不等于放手不管,设计改革方案要统筹考虑,改革要把握好管制与竞争的尺度,将电价机制改革作为重点,应建立竞争开放的电力市场。第四,进一步完善我国发电行业的放松管制,不但要以完备的法律体系作保障,还应当要接受专业的行业监管机构指导;不仅要准确把握管制与放松管制的“度”,而且要建立独立的调度机构,确保电力调度的公平和公正,并且还应实行环境保护的激励性管制,促进发电行业产业升级和结构调整。
[Abstract]:At present, the contradictions caused by the government regulation of the power generation industry have been highlighted, and the reform of government regulation is moving towards the deep water area. However, the reform of government regulation in power generation industry is a systematic project involving a wide range of areas, various contents and complicated procedures. The reform process is extremely difficult, and the results of the reform are mixed. In this context, this paper takes deregulation as the starting point, trying to prove that the process of deregulation is the process of enhancing the market vitality, optimizing the industrial structure and improving the output performance of the power generation industry. On the basis of reviewing the reform course of deregulation in power generation industry, from the perspective of public management, based on the theory of property right regulation, this paper discusses the reasons, process and performance of deregulation in power generation industry. An analytical model of "transaction cost-deregulation-system performance" is constructed. This theoretical model shows that the deregulation of power generation industry can effectively save transaction costs and improve the institutional performance of deregulation in power generation industry. Based on this theoretical model, this paper takes Guangdong Power Group as an example to analyze the process of deregulation to correct the failure of government regulation, and then puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to improve the deregulation of power generation industry. It provides a substantial theoretical basis for the reform of power generation industry in China. The basic conclusions are as follows: first, China has carried out four stages of reform on the deregulation of power generation industry, each stage of deregulation, are stumbling, gains and losses, the results are not consistent. At present, it has entered a new period of reform, the reform in this period is bound to further relax the regulation of the power generation industry, and build a sufficient competition pattern of the power generation market. Second, saving transaction costs is the initial motivation for the government to relax the regulation of power generation industry. Government regulation results in a serious consumption of public sector rents in the power generation industry, which increases endogenous transaction costs. The process of deregulation is a process of decreasing endogenous transaction costs and increasing institutional performance. The deregulation of the power generation industry, on the one hand, makes the government save the cost of regulation, on the other hand, it allows the power generation enterprises to achieve growth in a more flexible and diverse way. The reform course of Guangdong Power Group further proves that the deregulation of power generation industry is a dynamic process of decreasing regulation cost and increasing system performance. Thirdly, the experience of deregulation in foreign power generation industry shows that the reform should be guaranteed by law, and deregulation does not mean letting go. The design of the reform plan should be considered as a whole, and the reform should grasp the scale of regulation and competition. The reform of electricity price mechanism should be focused on the establishment of a competitive and open electricity market. Fourth, to further improve the deregulation of China's power generation industry, not only a complete legal system should be guaranteed, but also should be guided by professional industry regulatory agencies; It is necessary not only to accurately grasp the "degree" of regulation and deregulation, but also to establish independent dispatch agencies to ensure the fairness and fairness of electricity dispatch, and to implement incentive regulations for environmental protection. To promote industrial upgrading and restructuring of the power generation industry.
【学位授予单位】：华南农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F426.61
本文编号：2375505
[Abstract]:At present, the contradictions caused by the government regulation of the power generation industry have been highlighted, and the reform of government regulation is moving towards the deep water area. However, the reform of government regulation in power generation industry is a systematic project involving a wide range of areas, various contents and complicated procedures. The reform process is extremely difficult, and the results of the reform are mixed. In this context, this paper takes deregulation as the starting point, trying to prove that the process of deregulation is the process of enhancing the market vitality, optimizing the industrial structure and improving the output performance of the power generation industry. On the basis of reviewing the reform course of deregulation in power generation industry, from the perspective of public management, based on the theory of property right regulation, this paper discusses the reasons, process and performance of deregulation in power generation industry. An analytical model of "transaction cost-deregulation-system performance" is constructed. This theoretical model shows that the deregulation of power generation industry can effectively save transaction costs and improve the institutional performance of deregulation in power generation industry. Based on this theoretical model, this paper takes Guangdong Power Group as an example to analyze the process of deregulation to correct the failure of government regulation, and then puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to improve the deregulation of power generation industry. It provides a substantial theoretical basis for the reform of power generation industry in China. The basic conclusions are as follows: first, China has carried out four stages of reform on the deregulation of power generation industry, each stage of deregulation, are stumbling, gains and losses, the results are not consistent. At present, it has entered a new period of reform, the reform in this period is bound to further relax the regulation of the power generation industry, and build a sufficient competition pattern of the power generation market. Second, saving transaction costs is the initial motivation for the government to relax the regulation of power generation industry. Government regulation results in a serious consumption of public sector rents in the power generation industry, which increases endogenous transaction costs. The process of deregulation is a process of decreasing endogenous transaction costs and increasing institutional performance. The deregulation of the power generation industry, on the one hand, makes the government save the cost of regulation, on the other hand, it allows the power generation enterprises to achieve growth in a more flexible and diverse way. The reform course of Guangdong Power Group further proves that the deregulation of power generation industry is a dynamic process of decreasing regulation cost and increasing system performance. Thirdly, the experience of deregulation in foreign power generation industry shows that the reform should be guaranteed by law, and deregulation does not mean letting go. The design of the reform plan should be considered as a whole, and the reform should grasp the scale of regulation and competition. The reform of electricity price mechanism should be focused on the establishment of a competitive and open electricity market. Fourth, to further improve the deregulation of China's power generation industry, not only a complete legal system should be guaranteed, but also should be guided by professional industry regulatory agencies; It is necessary not only to accurately grasp the "degree" of regulation and deregulation, but also to establish independent dispatch agencies to ensure the fairness and fairness of electricity dispatch, and to implement incentive regulations for environmental protection. To promote industrial upgrading and restructuring of the power generation industry.
【学位授予单位】：华南农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F426.61
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 袁姗姗;;美国电力监管立法启示[J];理论界;2012年03期
2 谭忠富;李韩房;侯勇;;我国电力产业运行绩效的SCP理论分析[J];华东电力;2008年07期
3 胡健;杜国亮;;发达国家电力产业激励性规制模式及借鉴[J];商业时代;2007年08期
4 于良春;杨淑云;于华阳;;中国电力产业规制改革及其绩效的实证分析[J];经济与管理研究;2006年10期
5 楼旭明;窦彩兰;汪贵浦;;基于DEA的中国电力改革绩效相对有效性评价[J];当代财经;2006年04期
6 刘健,李国平,张杰华;我国电力行业放松管制的理论分析与实践思考[J];预测;2004年06期
，本文编号：2375505
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2375505.html
