青海省农业综合开发产业化经营项目绩效评价研究

发布时间：2018-01-27 16:09

本文关键词： 农业综合开发产业化经营项目绩效评价层次分析法　出处：《兰州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：为打破全国农业发展停滞局面,消除限制农业生产的不利条件,从1988年起中央财政开始每年安排专项资金支持农业综合开发,支持修建完善农业生产基础设施,促进农业生产加快发展。1993年,山东率先在全国提出农业产业化经营的发展思路后,该发展思路就得到了国家的高度关注,不久国家层面就制定相关政策在全国推广并予以扶持。为贯彻落实国家相关政策,财政部确定从每年安排的支持农业综合开发资金中安排不高于30%的部分,用于支持农业产业化经营项目建设,扶大扶强龙头企业,支持农业生产企业采用新技术对原有设备进行升级改造,提高产品精深加工水平,动更多农民参与产业化经营,提高农民收入水平。实证分析基础上提出的绩效改进建议有利于政府支持农业产业化经营政策的不断完善,对补齐农业发展短板、实现农业产业提质增效和农牧区群众扶贫脱困具有重要意义。本研究以青海省2015年数据为样本,采用实证分析方法对现有评价指标进行了筛选,构建更加科学的评价指标体系;再运用群组层次分析法对青海省农发产业化经营项目实施效果进行评价,实现了定量和定性分析方法的统一,也进一步降低了在构建比较判断矩阵时人为主观因素的影响。最后,通过与青海省财政投资评审中心农发产业化经营项目绩效评价结果的比较,验证采取该方法进行产业化经营项目绩效评价的可行性。研究表明:一是项目带动农户满意度、农户受益大小、组织管理、计划执行、项目带动农户参与率是农发产业化经营项目绩效最重要的五个指标。二是政府要通过创新农户与龙头企业的合作机制,实现“利益共享、风险共担”,带动农业收入不断增加;加强项目管理,严格项目计划执行,从而确保工程建设质量;建立农业综合开发项目绩效评价机制,最终达到以评促管的目的等改进措施,进一步提高政策的实施效果。三是群组层次分析法在评价指标筛选、确定指标权重、分析评价结果等方面更具科学性和合理性。
[Abstract]:In order to break the stagnant situation of agricultural development in China and eliminate the unfavorable conditions restricting agricultural production, the central finance has arranged special funds to support comprehensive agricultural development every year since 1988. In 1993, Shandong took the lead in putting forward the idea of agricultural industrialization management in the whole country. The development of the thinking has been highly concerned by the country, and soon the national level on the formulation of relevant policies in the country to promote and support. In order to implement the relevant national policies. The Ministry of Finance has decided to arrange no more than 30% of the annual funds to support comprehensive agricultural development, which will be used to support the construction of agricultural industrialization management projects and to support the leading enterprises in supporting the development of agricultural industrialization. We will support agricultural production enterprises to adopt new technologies to upgrade and transform existing equipment, improve the level of deep processing of products, and move more farmers to participate in industrial operations. Improve the level of farmers' income. Empirical analysis on the basis of performance improvement suggestions are conducive to the government to support the continuous improvement of agricultural industrialization management policy to complement the development of agriculture. It is of great significance to improve the quality and improve the efficiency of agricultural industry and to alleviate poverty and extricate the masses from poverty in pastoral areas. This study takes the data of Qinghai Province on 2015 as a sample and adopts the empirical analysis method to screen the existing evaluation indicators. Constructing a more scientific evaluation index system; Then use the group analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the agricultural industrial management project in Qinghai province, and achieve the unity of quantitative and qualitative analysis methods. It also further reduces the impact of human subjective factors in the construction of comparative judgment matrix. Finally, it compares the results with the results of evaluation of the performance of IFAD industrialization operation project of Qinghai Provincial Financial Investment Evaluation Center. To verify the feasibility of using this method to evaluate the performance of industrial management projects. The research shows that: first, the project drives farmers' satisfaction, farmers benefit, organization and management, plan implementation. The participation rate of farmers driven by the project is the most important five indicators of the performance of the project. Second, the government should innovate the cooperative mechanism between farmers and leading enterprises to achieve "benefit sharing and risk sharing". Driving the increase of agricultural income; Strengthen the project management, strictly carry out the project plan, so as to ensure the quality of the project construction; Establish the comprehensive agricultural development project performance evaluation mechanism, and finally achieve the purpose of evaluation and management improvement measures to further improve the implementation of the policy. Third, the group analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation index selection. It is more scientific and reasonable to determine the index weight and analyze the evaluation results.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F327

【参考文献】