基于PPP模式下大型体育场馆契约治理内外部机制的CFA模型构建与验证性研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 13:03

本文关键词： PPP模式大型体育场馆契约治理机制 CFA模型　出处：《沈阳体育学院学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：基于扎根理论和问卷调查法进行数据收集,以SEM结构方程为理论基础,构建契约治理内外部机制的CFA模型,利用SPSS23.0\AMOS21.0做验证性因子分析。结果显示:内部机制如属性识别机制、所有权配置机制、融资风险分担机制、报酬激励约束机制和运营管理机制等各维度因子负载显著大于0,且临界值C.R.都大于2.58(α=0.01);一阶组合信度均大于0.61、二阶为0.884,一阶AVE平均方差提取量大于0.58,其平方根大于相关系数值且二阶AVE为0.609。外部机制如绩效评价机制、信誉选择机制和监督问责机制的因子载荷显著大于0,且临界值C.R.都大于2.58(α=0.01);一阶组合信度均大于0.61,二阶为0.834,AVE平均方差提取量均值大于0.58,其平方根大于相关系数值且二阶AVE为0.634,均可以进行一阶、二阶CFA模型因子分析。因此,通过PPP模式下大型体育场馆契约治理内外部机制的路径关联和CFA模型构建,可更科学合理地进行公共体育服务设施的治理,使政府部门和社会部门在契约治理下制度化、规范化。
[Abstract]:Based on the rooted theory and questionnaire method, the CFA model of the internal and external mechanisms of contract governance is constructed based on the SEM structural equation. Using SPSS23.0\ AMOS21.0 to do confirmatory factor analysis. The results show that: internal mechanisms such as attribute identification mechanism, ownership allocation mechanism, financing risk sharing mechanism. The payoff incentive and constraint mechanism and operation management mechanism are all more than 0, and the critical value C.R. is more than 2.58 (伪 0.01g); The first order combination reliability was greater than 0.61, the second order was 0.884, and the average variance extraction amount of first-order AVE was more than 0.58. The square root is greater than the correlation coefficient and the second order AVE is 0.609.The factor load of external mechanisms such as performance evaluation mechanism, reputation selection mechanism and supervisory accountability mechanism is significantly greater than 0. The critical value of C. R. is more than 2.58 (伪 -0.01g); The first order combination reliability was greater than 0.61, the second order was 0.834% AVE, the mean value of average variance was more than 0.58, the square root was greater than the correlation coefficient and the second order AVE was 0.634. Therefore, through the PPP model of large-scale stadiums contract governance of internal and external mechanisms of path association and CFA model construction. The management of public sports service facilities can be carried out more scientifically and reasonably, so that government departments and social departments can be institutionalized and standardized under contract governance.
【作者单位】：福建师范大学体育科学学院;韩山师范学院体育学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“我国公共体育服务标准研究”(12BTY012)
【分类号】：G818
【正文快照】： 目前我国部分大型体育场馆投融资模式仍然单一,政府完全承担经费与风险,导致体育场馆建管资金缺口巨大,而且盈利模式混乱、管理机制滞后[1]。因此,需引入PPP模式来解决大型体育场馆建设与管理才能够充分挖掘经济效益与社会效益的潜力。PPP代表的是一个特殊、具体的大型公共项

【相似文献】