当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 绩效管理论文 >

新常态下的企业创新驱动提质增效研究

发布时间:2018-03-22 16:32

  本文选题:企业创新 切入点:提质增效 出处:《西南交通大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:进入21世纪,国际竞争日趋激烈,依靠创新提升综合国力和核心竞争实力,走创新型国家之路成为世界上许多国家的共同选择。党的十八大提出"中国要适应国内外经济形势新变化,加快形成新的经济发展方式,把推动发展的立足点转到提高质量和效益上来,着力增强创新驱动发展新动力,要坚持走中国特色自主创新道路,以全球视野谋划和推动创新,提高原始创新、集成创新和引进消化吸收再创新能力,更加注重协同创新。"特别是在2014年国家正式部署全国企业创新调查工作,全面吹响了中国企业创新驱动提质增效的进军号角。因此"创新驱动提质增效"已成为当今我国社会经济领域中最时髦、最热门的研究主题之一。本文旨在通过对N区规模以上工业企业一系列创新驱动提质增效的相关研究,紧紧抓住N区规模以上企业的龙头,寻找出N区规模以上企业发展的有效路径,为在新常态下进一步全面提升N区新的经济增长点奠定基础。本文首先对N区三次经济普查中规模以上工业企业的绩效进行分析,通过单位数、从业人员数以及财务成本分析,并且与非规模以上企业的对比、与历史时期的对比、与其他地区的对比,以及科技、人力、资本和其他因素的分析,得出新常态下企业发展的新特征、新难点。然后对N区规模以上工业企业创新的投入、产出等基本情况做了分析,大体了解了 N区企业创新的一些特点和问题,从而进一步在第4章对N区规模以上工业企业创新驱动提质增效做了 SWOT分析,分析得出了 N区企业创新驱动提质增效的一些优势、劣势、机会和可能面临的威胁。最后,本文还通过计量模型,构建了N区的生产函数,估算了N区的全要素生产率,通过数学模型进一步验证了N区企业创新驱动提质增效的效果,探索了新时期企业创新驱动提质增效的发展路径。本文研究主要取得了以下结论:首先,N区规模以上工业企业的经济地位在该区很重要,港澳台商和外商投资企业的平均规模大于内资企业。其次,新兴产业的发展较好,创新性较强,但传统行业比较落后,也没有很好地驱动提质增效,大型企业科技机构、人员和RD活动在总量上不及中型企业。再次,企业科技创新活动投入不断加大,民营企业居主体地位,技术创新和技术应用成效显著,产业集聚成为N经济发展过程中的重要动力。但第三产业发展的总体支撑力不强,内部结构也不尽合理。传统产业集聚不断巩固和新兴行业集聚迅速扩展,但集聚水平仍处于初始阶段。企业创新驱动提质增效还存在一些潜力,比如:基本单位总量和效益增长显著,但企业抵御风险的能力较低。最后,通过计量模型验证,给出生产函数和全要素生产率的估算:根据计量模型估计结果,全要素生产率贡献率高达79%。充分显示N区在利用科技创新和技术进步促进经济发展方面的突出表现,再次印证了创新驱动提质增效是企业科学发展的有效路径。
[Abstract]:In twenty-first Century, the international competition is becoming increasingly fierce, rely on innovation to enhance the comprehensive national strength and core competitive strength, take the innovative road has become the common choice of many countries in the world. The eighteen party put forward "Chinese to adapt to the new changes in domestic and international economic situation, accelerate the formation of a new mode of economic development, to promote the development of a foothold to improve quality and efficiency, strengthen innovation driven development momentum, to adhere to the road of independent innovation Chinese characteristics, in order to promote innovation and global perspective plan, improve the original innovation, integrated innovation and the introduction of digestion and absorption and innovation, greater emphasis on collaborative innovation. Especially the formal deployment of the national enterprise innovation survey work in 2014 overall, the quality and efficiency of Chinese driver sounded the clarion call to enter the enterprise innovation. Therefore" innovation driven, quality and efficiency "has become China's economic and social fields The most fashionable, one of the most popular research topics. This paper aims to research on the industrial enterprises above the scale of N a series of innovation driven quality and efficiency, firmly grasp the scale N the leading enterprise, to find out the effective path of Development Zone Enterprises above the scale of N, lay the foundation for further promote the new economic growth point N in the new normal. This paper firstly analyzes the three economic census in the N area of Industrial Enterprises above the scale of performance, by the number of units, the number of employees and financial cost analysis, and compared with the above scale enterprises, compared with the historical period, compared with other areas of human, science and technology, and analysis capital and other factors, the new characteristics of enterprise development under the new normal difficulty. Then the new industrial enterprises above the scale of N innovation investment, the basic situation of output are analyzed, a general understanding of N some of the features and problems of enterprise innovation, and further in the fourth chapter of the industrial enterprises above the scale of N innovation driven quality and efficiency of the SWOT analysis, analysis of the advantages, the quality and efficiency of enterprise innovation driven N weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Finally, this paper also through the econometric model. The construction of the production function N, estimated the total factor productivity N, through mathematical models to further verify the quality and efficiency of N driven enterprise innovation effect, explore the development path of innovation driven enterprises in the new era of quality and efficiency. This paper has made the following main conclusions: first, the industrial Enterprises above the scale of N area the economic status is very important in this area, the average size of Hong Kong Macao and Taiwan and foreign investment enterprises than domestic enterprises. Secondly, the development of new industries is good, strong innovation, but the traditional industry is also backward. There is no good driving quality and efficiency, large enterprises of science and technology institutions, personnel and RD activities than on the total amount of medium-sized enterprises. Thirdly, the enterprise technological innovation activities increasing investment, private enterprise is the main body of technological innovation, and technology application effect, industrial agglomeration has become an important driving force for economic development in the process of N. But the overall support force the development of the third industry is not strong, the internal structure is not reasonable. The traditional industrial agglomeration to continuously consolidate and emerging industry agglomeration is expanding rapidly, but the agglomeration level is still in the initial stage. The enterprise innovation driven quality and efficiency is still some potential, such as: the basic unit of gross and benefit growth significantly, but their ability to resist risks is low. Finally, through econometric model validation, estimates of production function and total factor productivity: according to the estimation results of the econometric model, TFP contribution rate is as high as 79%. full It shows that N area's outstanding performance in promoting economic development by technological innovation and technological progress confirms that innovation driven, quality and efficiency enhancement is an effective way for scientific development of enterprises.

【学位授予单位】:西南交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F273.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 魏杰;汪浩;;推动创新驱动型经济增长的政策建议[J];经济纵横;2016年05期

2 韩兆洲;马佳羽;;中国“一带一路”省市区域创新效率及空间效应[J];产经评论;2016年02期

3 杨林涛;韩兆洲;王昭颖;;多视角下R&D资本化测算方法比较与应用[J];数量经济技术经济研究;2015年12期

4 顾海;孙嘉尉;;人力资本投资与经济增长的空间面板计量分析[J];统计与决策;2015年17期

5 王利;;企业创新驱动增长的测度与实证分析[J];统计研究;2015年08期

6 周琳;;基于创新驱动发展战略的企业创新绩效研究[J];经济问题;2015年05期

7 董晓芳;袁燕;;企业创新、生命周期与聚集经济[J];经济学(季刊);2014年02期

8 钟田丽;马娜;胡彦斌;;企业创新投入要素与融资结构选择——基于创业板上市公司的实证检验[J];会计研究;2014年04期

9 郝颖;辛清泉;刘星;;地区差异、企业投资与经济增长质量[J];经济研究;2014年03期

10 董晓庆;赵坚;袁朋伟;;国有企业创新效率损失研究[J];中国工业经济;2014年02期



本文编号:1649468

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/1649468.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e2a72***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com