江西省农民工创业政策绩效评价及政策体系优化

发布时间：2018-04-05 10:53

  本文选题：农民工　切入点：创业政策　出处：《东华理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：从2004年至今,我国中央一号文件连续14年聚焦于“三农”问题。近年来随着经济结构调整、经济增速放缓,大量农民工失业返乡,各地区各级政府部门相继颁布农民工创业政策。农民工创业政策作为重要公共政策之一,绩效的关注点何在?如何评价其绩效?如何在当前环境下优化政策体系,进而提高绩效?现有研究主要从效率性、效果性、经济性、满意度等对农民工创业政策结果进行评价,忽略了创业扶持政策制定的需求导向性、目标导向性、合理性、系统性等关键要素。作为公共政策,实现其“政”的功能,即公共价值,才是其绩效评价核心。农民工创业政策体系从其本质上来说是政策相关利益主体之间的相互作用,这种相互作用的关系组成了农民工创业政策的过程结构,功能能否有效发挥取决于其过程结构,进而影响政策绩效,而对政策各过程环节的绩效进行评价正是现有研究力度不足但至关重要的一个方面。在现有国内外研究的基础上,本研究构建农民工创业政策绩效评价的理论框架,对江西省农民工创业政策体系各个过程进行绩效评价,探析其政策过程中存在的影响绩效的问题所在,进而提出政策体系优化建议。(1)农民工创业政策绩效评价的标准体系。在对现有文献梳理的基础上,通过对比研究,构建了一个农民工创业政策绩效评价的标准体系。其中,政策制定过程为目标明确性、公平性、参与性、合理性、可行性、系统性6个标准;政策执行过程为政府主导型、权责明确性、充分性、影响力、回应性5个标准;政策结果输出过程为目标实现度、效率性、满意度3个标准;政策监控与考核过程包括参与性、灵活性2个标准。(2)江西省农民工创业政策绩效评价结果。主要得出以下结论:政策制定过程:政策制定的目标明确,合理性较高,可行性较差,政策主体参与程度较低,农民工创业政策扶持力度弱,政策公平性不足,欠缺系统性考虑;政策执行过程:基层人力资源匮乏,农民工创业政策执行力度弱,政策对农民工创业氛围及创业意愿影响力均一般,政策获取便利度、利用容易度较低,农民工对政策执行情况满意度不足;政策结果输出过程:目标实现度、效率性、满意度均不高;政策监控与考核过程:监控与考核机制不健全,灵活性未有效发挥。(3)江西省农民工创业政策体系优化建议:第一,优化政策主体利益表达机制,提高政府信息获取能力;第二,培养农民工民主权力的意识,提升政策主体主动参与性;第三,优化政策制定方案咨询机制,加强创业政策顶层设计;第四,完善政策执行主体权力配置,强化政策资金专项预算管理;第五,提供实地、个性化创业指导,做好农民工创业政策落实工作;第六,加强第三方评估与大众监督,发挥政策多元主体监督作用;第七,建立创业政策专项责任机制,激励、约束并行支撑政策顺利落实。
[Abstract]:Since 2004, the first document of the Central Committee of China has focused on the issue of agriculture, countryside and farmers for 14 consecutive years.In recent years, with the adjustment of economic structure, economic growth slowed down, a large number of migrant workers returned home unemployed, various regional government departments have promulgated policies for migrant workers entrepreneurship.As one of the important public policies, what is the focus on the performance of peasant workers' entrepreneurship policy?How to evaluate its performance?How to optimize the policy system and improve the performance in the current environment?The present research mainly evaluates the policy results of peasant workers' entrepreneurship from the aspects of efficiency, effectiveness, economy, satisfaction and so on, neglecting the key factors such as demand-oriented, goal-oriented, rationality, systematicness and so on.As a public policy, to realize its "political" function, that is, public value, is the core of its performance evaluation.In essence, the policy system of peasant workers' entrepreneurship is the interaction between the relevant stakeholders of the policy. This kind of interaction constitutes the process structure of the peasant workers' entrepreneurship policy, and whether the function can be played effectively depends on the process structure.Then it affects the policy performance, and the evaluation of the process of policy performance is an important aspect of the current research.On the basis of existing domestic and foreign studies, this study constructs a theoretical framework of performance evaluation of rural migrant workers' entrepreneurship policy, and evaluates the performance of each process of rural migrant workers' entrepreneurship policy system in Jiangxi Province.This paper analyzes the problems existing in the policy process and puts forward the policy system optimization suggestion. 1) the standard system for evaluating the performance of peasant workers' entrepreneurship policy.On the basis of combing the existing literature, this paper constructs a standard system for evaluating the performance of peasant workers' entrepreneurship policy through a comparative study.Among them, the process of policy making is clear, fair, participatory, rational, feasible and systematic, and the process of policy implementation is government-led, with clear power and responsibility, adequacy, influence and responsiveness.The output process of policy results includes three criteria: the degree of goal realization, efficiency and satisfaction, and the process of policy monitoring and evaluation includes two criteria of participation and flexibility) the evaluation results of rural migrant workers' entrepreneurship policy performance in Jiangxi Province.The main conclusions are as follows: the policy making process: the goal of policy formulation is clear, the rationality is high, the feasibility is poor, the participation of policy subjects is low, the policy support for migrant workers' entrepreneurship is weak, and the policy fairness is insufficient.Lack of systematic consideration; Policy implementation process: lack of human resources at the grass-roots level, weak implementation of migrant workers entrepreneurship policy, the impact of policies on the entrepreneurial atmosphere and entrepreneurial willingness of migrant workers are general, policy access convenience, easy to use,Migrant workers are not satisfied with the implementation of the policy; the process of policy outcome output: the degree of goal realization, efficiency, satisfaction are not high; the process of policy monitoring and assessment: monitoring and assessment mechanism is not perfect,Flexibility does not play an effective role in Jiangxi Province migrant workers entrepreneurship policy system optimization suggestions: first, optimize the policy main interests expression mechanism, improve the ability to obtain government information; second, cultivate the awareness of democratic rights of migrant workers,Third, optimize the consultation mechanism of policy formulation program, strengthen the top-level design of entrepreneurship policy; fourth, improve the power allocation of policy executive body, strengthen the special budget management of policy funds; fifth, provide field,Individualized entrepreneurial guidance, do a good job in implementing the policy of migrant workers entrepreneurship; sixth, strengthen third-party evaluation and public supervision, play the role of policy multi-subject supervision; seventh, establish entrepreneurship policy special responsibility mechanism, incentive,The constraint parallel support policy is carried out smoothly.
【学位授予单位】：东华理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F323.6;F279.27

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 薛浩;陈桂香;;大学生创业扶持政策评价体系构建研究[J];国家教育行政学院学报;2016年03期

2 张翠娥;李跃梅;李欢;;资本禀赋与农民社会治理参与行为——基于5省1599户农户数据的实证分析[J];中国农村观察;2016年01期

3 傅晋华;;农民工创业政策:回顾、评价与展望[J];中国科技论坛;2015年09期

4 魏红征;卢扬帆;郑方辉;;广东省LED与新能源汽车发展专项资金绩效第三方评价[J];南方经济;2015年07期

5 郑方辉;廖逸儿;;财政专项资金绩效评价的基本问题[J];中国行政管理;2015年06期

6 张再生;牛晓东;;基于DEA模型的人才政策绩效评价研究——以天津市人才政策文件为例[J];管理现代化;2015年03期

7 胡俊波;;农民工返乡创业扶持政策绩效评估体系:构建与应用[J];社会科学研究;2014年05期

8 高静;张应良;;基于1990-2011年统计数据的农户创业、分工演进、交易效率与农村经济增长分析[J];西南大学学报(自然科学版);2014年05期

9 庄晋财;芮正云;曾纪芬;;双重网络嵌入、创业资源获取对农民工创业能力的影响——基于赣、皖、苏183个农民工创业样本的实证分析[J];中国农村观察;2014年03期

10 周建锋;;基于绩效评价的农民工返乡创业行为研究[J];商业研究;2014年03期

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前2条

1 丁志成;城乡统筹背景下江西省农民工创业政策绩效评价研究[D];东华理工大学;2016年

2 谢媛;政策评估模式及其应用[D];厦门大学;2001年

，

本文编号：1714461