政府整体性视野下的内部治理方式比较:忠诚性与策略性维度

发布时间：2018-04-05 12:52

本文选题：政府整体性　切入点：项目制　出处：《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：近几十年来,西方国家和中国政府内部都通过引入绩效管理来提升效率,但也带来对政府整体性的损害。相比于西方早已在理论和实践上展开纠正,中国研究界和实务界还缺少反思,学术界的政府内部治理研究偏重于策略性治理,忽视了对维护政府整体性必不可少的忠诚性治理。以"忠诚性-策略性"治理机制二分法为分析框架,结合中国政府体系的"条-块"结构特征,对已受学界关注的项目制、行政发包制等四种政府内部主要治理方式所包含的治理机制组合进行初步分析,认为:忠诚性治理在政府内部治理中与策略性治理具有同等重要性;作为两种治理机制的不同组合,四种治理方式具有不同的治理效率特征,它们相互补充,共同组成了当前中国政府内部治理格局;忠诚性治理在改革开放后基本未得发展,落后于社会环境和政府内治理格局的变化。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, both western countries and Chinese governments have introduced performance management to improve efficiency, but it has also caused damage to the government as a whole.Compared with the correction in theory and practice in the West, there is still a lack of reflection in Chinese research and practice. The research on internal governance in academic circles is focused on strategic governance and neglects the loyalty governance which is necessary to maintain the integrity of government.Based on the dichotomy of "loyalty-strategic" governance mechanism and the structural characteristics of "strip-block" of Chinese government system, this paper analyzes the project system which has attracted the attention of academic circles.This paper makes a preliminary analysis of the combination of governance mechanisms contained in the four main forms of governance within the government, such as the administrative contract system, and holds that: loyalty governance is as important as strategic governance in government internal governance;As different combinations of the two governance mechanisms, the four governance modes have different governance efficiency characteristics, which complement each other and form the current internal governance pattern of the Chinese government; loyalty governance has not been developed since the reform and opening up.Lag behind the social environment and the change of governance pattern within the government.
【作者单位】：北京大学社会学系;北京市社会科学院;
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】