当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 绩效管理论文 >

决策制定方法和战略决策速度与企业绩效关系的实证研究

发布时间:2018-05-20 00:02

  本文选题:战略决策过程 + 决策制定方法 ; 参考:《沈阳工业大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着知识经济和经济全球化进程的不断加快,企业的外部环境发生了剧烈地变化,企业的外部经营环境逐渐呈现出不确定性、复杂性以及丰裕度低的特征,而环境因素对企业绩效的影响也得到了越来越多学者的认可。为了保证企业绩效,高层管理团队不得不把握时机制定正确、有效地战略决策。在高速发展的外部环境下,通过决策制定方法制定出正确的战略决策不但能帮助企业在危急关头及时做出战略调整,而且在市场变化的关键时刻有利于企业抢占市场先机。因此,决策制定方法对企业绩效而言有着重要意义。本文首先结合战略决策过程理论,在回顾与梳理决策制定方法、战略决策速度与企业绩效相关研究成果的基础上构建概念模型,提出理论假设。即决策制定方法两个维度与企业绩效正相关;决策制定方法两个维度与战略决策速度正相关;战略决策速度与企业绩效正相关;战略决策速度在决策制定方法与企业绩效间起到中介作用。随后根据相关学者的理论研究和实证研究选取决策制定方法、战略决策速度及企业绩效的测量指标,采用问卷调查方式,对我国中北部及沿海地区62家企业高管进行调研,共收集有效数据197份。利用SPSS20.0,Amos20.0统计分析软件对有效数据进行信度效度检验、相关分析及结构方程检验。实证研究结果表明,决策制定方法中战略共识与认知冲突两个维度与企业绩效显著正相关;决策制定方法中战略共识与认知冲突两个维度与战略决策速度显著正相关;战略决策速度与企业绩效显著正相关;战略决策速度在决策制定方法与企业绩效之间起到部分中介作用,其中,战略决策速度在战略共识与企业绩效之间只存在间接效应,战略决策速度在认知冲突与企业绩效之间既存在间接效应又存在直接效应。最后,本研究进一步探讨了文章的研究结论,及其对管理学的启示,提出了本研究的局限性,并对未来的研究方向做出了展望。
[Abstract]:With the accelerating process of knowledge economy and economic globalization, the external environment of enterprises has changed dramatically. The external business environment of enterprises gradually presents the characteristics of uncertainty, complexity and low abundance. The impact of environmental factors on corporate performance has also been recognized by more and more scholars. In order to ensure enterprise performance, senior management team has to seize the opportunity to make correct and effective strategic decisions. Under the environment of high speed development, making the correct strategic decision through the method of decision making can not only help the enterprise to make the strategic adjustment in time of crisis, but also help the enterprise to seize the market opportunity at the critical moment of market change. Therefore, the decision-making method has the important significance to the enterprise performance. In this paper, based on the theory of strategic decision-making process, the conceptual model is constructed on the basis of reviewing and combing the methods of decision making, the speed of strategic decision and the performance of enterprises, and the theoretical hypothesis is put forward. That is, the two dimensions of decision making method are positively related to enterprise performance, the two dimensions of decision-making method are positively related to the speed of strategic decision making, the speed of strategic decision making is positively related to enterprise performance. Strategic decision-making speed plays an intermediary role between decision-making method and enterprise performance. Then according to the relevant scholars' theoretical research and empirical research, select the decision-making methods, strategic decision-making speed and corporate performance measurement indicators, using a questionnaire survey of 62 corporate executives in the central and northern and coastal areas of China. A total of 197 valid data were collected. SPSS 20.0 Amos 20.0 software was used to test the reliability and validity of effective data, correlation analysis and structural equation test. The empirical results show that the two dimensions of strategic consensus and cognitive conflict are positively correlated with firm performance, and the two dimensions of strategic consensus and cognitive conflict are positively correlated with the speed of strategic decision-making. The speed of strategic decision plays a part of intermediary role between decision-making method and enterprise performance, among which, there is only indirect effect between strategic decision speed and corporate performance. Strategic decision-making speed has both indirect and direct effects between cognitive conflict and firm performance. Finally, this study further discusses the conclusions of the paper, and its implications for management, puts forward the limitations of this study, and makes a prospect for the future research direction.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F272;F272.5

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 方绘龙;葛玉辉;;基于团队效能感的团队互动对TMT战略决策速度的影响研究[J];物流工程与管理;2016年06期

2 杨建君;徐国军;;战略共识、知识共享与组织学习的实证研究[J];科学学与科学技术管理;2016年01期

3 温忠麟;叶宝娟;;中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J];心理科学进展;2014年05期

4 陈权;张凯丽;施国洪;;高管团队战略决策过程研究:一个理论模型——基于行为决策理论[J];管理现代化;2014年01期

5 华斌;陈忠卫;;高管团队凝聚力、冲突与组织绩效——基于创业过程的研究[J];当代财经;2013年12期

6 魏虹;陈传明;;企业家社会资本对利益相关者战略共识的影响分析[J];南京社会科学;2013年10期

7 郭立新;陈传明;;企业家社会资本、战略决策速度与企业绩效的关系——基于中国企业的实证研究[J];南京社会科学;2011年10期

8 贺艳春;古家军;;基于时间竞争的企业高管团队战略决策过程概念模型构建[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期

9 肖璐;;高管团队信任对组织绩效的影响:团队冲突的中介作用[J];经济研究导刊;2010年06期

10 苍玉权;杨忠;;战略决策过程研究:一个综合分析框架[J];科技进步与对策;2008年02期



本文编号:1912268

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/1912268.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ddb89***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com