“复杂政策”与国家治理——基于国家连片开发扶贫项目的讨论
发布时间：2018-07-25 13:50
【摘要】：公共政策领域本身的特点决定了治理模式的选择。在治理目标具有综合性、技术路径清晰度低、环境差异敏感度高的"复杂政策"领域,向基层政府"授权"有利于提升治理的有效性,但也增加了其利用信息优势和自由裁量空间发生"道德风险"的可能。鉴于此,在"复杂政策"的治理领域中,中央政府在常规的目标设定与督查考核之外,通过出台纲领性、指导性的专项政策,以及扩大社区参与等多种控制手段来规训地方政府的偏差行为。"复杂政策"治理模式旨在建立"央—地"之间的协作机制,发挥好中央和地方"两个积极性",从而弥合中央政府对政策推进的总体控制与地方政府在行政实践中自由裁量权之间的张力。从实践绩效来看,该模式无疑是有益的探索,但有待于进一步的优化与完善。
[Abstract]:The choice of governance mode is determined by the characteristics of public policy field itself. In the "complex policy" areas where governance objectives are comprehensive, technical path clarity is low, and environmental disparity sensitivity is high, "empowerment" of grass-roots governments is conducive to enhancing the effectiveness of governance. But it also increases its use of information advantages and discretionary space to occur "moral hazard." In view of this, in the field of governance of "complex policies," the central government, in addition to the conventional goal setting and inspection and examination, has adopted programmatic and guiding special policies. And expand community participation and other means of control to discipline local government deviant behavior. " The complex policy "governance model" aims to establish collaborative mechanisms between "central and local" areas, Give full play to the "two positives" of the central and local governments so as to bridge the tension between the central government's overall control over the promotion of policies and the local governments' discretion in administrative practice. From the point of view of practical performance, this model is undoubtedly a beneficial exploration, but needs to be further optimized and perfected.
【作者单位】： 华中师范大学社会学院湖北省社会发展与社会政策研究中心;华中师范大学可持续发展研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(13CSH087) 国家自然科学基金项目(41401165)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D63
本文编号：2144017
[Abstract]:The choice of governance mode is determined by the characteristics of public policy field itself. In the "complex policy" areas where governance objectives are comprehensive, technical path clarity is low, and environmental disparity sensitivity is high, "empowerment" of grass-roots governments is conducive to enhancing the effectiveness of governance. But it also increases its use of information advantages and discretionary space to occur "moral hazard." In view of this, in the field of governance of "complex policies," the central government, in addition to the conventional goal setting and inspection and examination, has adopted programmatic and guiding special policies. And expand community participation and other means of control to discipline local government deviant behavior. " The complex policy "governance model" aims to establish collaborative mechanisms between "central and local" areas, Give full play to the "two positives" of the central and local governments so as to bridge the tension between the central government's overall control over the promotion of policies and the local governments' discretion in administrative practice. From the point of view of practical performance, this model is undoubtedly a beneficial exploration, but needs to be further optimized and perfected.
【作者单位】： 华中师范大学社会学院湖北省社会发展与社会政策研究中心;华中师范大学可持续发展研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(13CSH087) 国家自然科学基金项目(41401165)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D63
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 程超;反腐败也要有两个积极性[J];党政论坛;1994年06期
2 张雨生;;改革亦如逆水行舟[J];学习月刊;2007年03期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 余知鹏;社区应发挥三大作用[N];中国社会报;2006年
，本文编号：2144017
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2144017.html
