美国高等教育绩效拨款实践:经验与启示

发布时间：2018-07-28 15:34

【摘要】：20世纪70年代,美国一些州开始实施高等教育绩效拨款政策,迄今经历了两次浪潮、两种拨款模式。美国高等教育绩效拨款政策稳定性不仅受制于政府财政状况、政府公共议题优先顺序选择,而且深受利益相关者态度、绩效拨款实际效用等因素影响,而支持方与反对方及意见保留者在绩效拨款功能、引发影响等问题上仍然纷争不断。借鉴美国高等教育绩效拨款实践经验,应理性认识绩效拨款、以争取利益相关者达成共识为前提,明确绩效拨款的价值取向与适用范围,科学设定评估指标,合理确定绩效拨款模式与配比,建立健全相关立法、完善制度设计和实施程序。
[Abstract]:In the 1970s, some American states began to implement the performance grant policy for higher education, which has experienced two waves and two funding modes. The stability of higher education performance allocation policy in the United States is not only restricted by the government's financial situation and the priority of government public issues, but also influenced by the attitude of stakeholders and the actual utility of performance allocation. However, there are still disputes between the supporters and the opposing parties and the reservists on the function of the performance allocation and the impact. Based on the practical experience of American higher education performance allocation, it is necessary to rationally understand the performance allocation, make clear the value orientation and application scope of the performance allocation, and set the evaluation index scientifically, taking the common understanding of the stakeholders as the premise, and making clear the value orientation and application scope of the performance allocation. Reasonably determine the performance allocation model and matching, establish and improve the relevant legislation, improve the system design and implementation procedures.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学教育学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“共政策视阈中中国特色的世界一流大学建设绩效评估研究”(2016030083)
【分类号】：G649.712

【相似文献】