印纪传媒买壳上市后的财务绩效评价与分析
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC, the government has attached great importance to the development of the cultural media industry and issued a series of policies and regulations to support the development of the cultural media industry. But the cultural media industry is in the fierce competition at present, the market share begins to become smaller and smaller, and the enterprise also has encountered the financing difficulty question. Listing will be a key step for them to raise further funds in the future. Compared with the complicated procedures and the long waiting process of IPO listing, buying a shell listing will be an important step for them to complete the "curve to save the country". Although the current regulatory requirements for shell listing are becoming more stringent, but for excellent enterprises, shell listing can save them time and cost. Therefore, this paper studies a case of shell listing in cultural media enterprises. This paper analyzes the financial problems of cultural media after buying a shell through the evaluation of financial performance after buying a shell, so it has certain research value. This paper mainly includes three aspects of financial performance evaluation of Indian media after buying shell. Firstly, the paper makes a comparative analysis of 14 major financial indicators (including profitability, operating ability) before and after India media buy shell. Solvency and growth capacity); Secondly, we use factor analysis method to analyze 14 financial indicators of 20 cultural media enterprises from 2012 to 2015, and then get the corresponding score matrix and comprehensive ranking to judge whether the shell is successful or not. Finally, according to the above results analysis of the shell after the financial problems, and analyze the reasons. The results show that, first of all, through the comparison of financial indicators, it is found that, in addition to the decline in operating capacity, the profitability and solvency of enterprises are better, and the growth capacity has a relatively stable growth. Therefore, overall performance in the shell listing after the upward trend. Secondly, the result of comprehensive evaluation of financial performance by factor analysis shows that, on the one hand, the comprehensive evaluation ranking of India Media is rising after the purchase of shell. On the other hand, although the growth and solvency factors after buying a shell rose to 12th place, the operating capacity factor dropped to fifth place after buying the shell. Finally, the paper analyzes the reasons for the decline of operating capacity, and points out that the main factors of the decline are the turnover ratio of accounts receivable and inventory, the main reason is that the revenue of integrated marketing business declined more in 2015, and the business cycle of film and television drama is longer. Film and TV related business inventory accounts for more and more. Comprehensive analysis shows that India Media has a big problem in its operation ability. After in-depth analysis, it is found that after buying a shell and listing, the enterprises continue to increase the investment of the film and television industry in order to expand their own business scale. Thus weakening the original integrated marketing business. In addition, the rapid expansion of inventory, resulting in a decline in the level of asset management. This paper has a certain objectivity to the empirical results of India media financial performance evaluation, and the conclusions can also play a certain reference to the managers of the enterprise. And has deepened to the cultural media enterprise financial performance appraisal research.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G206-F
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王瑞芳;买壳上市你能玩得转吗?[J];科技智囊;2004年02期
2 易凯;广电企业买壳上市初探[J];有线电视技术;2002年03期
3 陆舰;略论报业“买壳上市”及其实现途径[J];新闻记者;2000年06期
4 周志兴,吴应泉,朱汉夫,董志强;买壳上市IT企业又一课[J];中国计算机用户;1998年40期
5 吴上荣;陈云生;许威;;EVA财务绩效评价体系探析[J];中国金融电脑;2009年04期
6 邱燕娜;招商迪辰的资本“神话”[J];软件世界;2002年12期
相关会议论文 前7条
1 李秦康;;陕西企业境内外买壳上市之我见[A];陕西省体制改革研究会2004优秀论文集[C];2004年
2 李秦康;;陕西企业境内外买壳上市之我见[A];陕西省体制改革研究会2004年优秀论文集[C];2004年
3 吴斌;胡冰;余雷刚;;基于控制权收益的企业买壳上市溢价影响因素的实证研究[A];中国会计学会2006年学术年会论文集(中册)[C];2006年
4 张国才;傅爱武;周怡坤;陈海军;燕晓红;;煤炭企业集团在香港上市的模式选择及实现途径研究[A];资本运营、克服困难、振兴经济——煤炭经济管理新论(第12辑)第十三届中国煤炭经济管理论坛暨2012年中国煤炭学会经济管理专业委员会年会论文集[C];2012年
5 邹永生;;买壳上市与矿业公司海外融资[A];资源·环境·循环经济——中国地质矿产经济学会2005年学术年会论文集[C];2005年
6 孙薇;程龙生;宋煜;;基于模糊综合评价方法的企业财务绩效评价[A];江苏省现场统计研究会第十次学术年会论文集[C];2006年
7 张青;;上市公司财务绩效评价有效性实证研究1[A];第三届(2008)中国管理学年会——运作管理分会场论文集[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 深圳市唐融投资咨询有限公司购并研究所 陈新亮;民营企业买壳上市的误区[N];证券时报;2003年
2 本报记者 烟成群;买壳上市风险几何[N];河北经济日报;2004年
3 ;什么是买壳上市[N];人民政协报;2001年
4 王冉;买壳上市为何败多成少[N];深圳商报;2003年
5 屈伟;公司上市另一途径:买壳上市[N];医药经济报;2003年
6 中实集团投资部;买壳上市与借壳上市有何区别?[N];中国经营报;2001年
7 广东经天律师事务所黄晓黎律师;你的企业适合买壳上市吗?[N];证券时报;2002年
8 卢少平;胡伟;美国买壳上市分析(一)[N];证券时报;2007年
9 卢少平 胡伟;美国买壳上市分析(三)[N];证券时报;2007年
10 王德强;境外买壳上市须依规行事[N];中国证券报;2001年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 程云川;我国企业买壳上市风险控制研究[D];武汉理工大学;2012年
2 明星;农垦国有资产财务绩效评价研究[D];华中农业大学;2010年
3 孙奕驰;上市公司财务绩效评价及其影响因素研究[D];辽宁大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 奚少华;印纪传媒买壳上市后的财务绩效评价与分析[D];上海师范大学;2017年
2 范盛铬;我国企业买壳上市行为的理论与实证分析[D];厦门大学;2001年
3 苏静;上市公司并购重组的行业板块效应[D];山东大学;2015年
4 夏祖伟;买壳上市效应研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
5 杨晓刚;买壳上市理论与实例分析[D];天津大学;2003年
6 孙焱;北京金融街建设集团公司买壳上市的启示[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
7 李享;买壳上市运作研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2005年
8 蒋丽华;对买壳上市相关问题的研究[D];西南财经大学;2003年
9 梁凯;买壳上市的理论与实证分析[D];电子科技大学;2003年
10 唐珂;成都鹏博士股份有限公司"买壳上市"的实证研究[D];西南财经大学;2004年
,本文编号:2319640
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2319640.html