国家策略中的社会资本生长逻辑——基于环境治理的分析

发布时间：2018-11-19 13:50

【摘要】：以当代中国环境治理为背景,本文通过定性混合研究方法对三例环保事件等进行分析,讨论了国家对社会资本生长的影响机制。环境治理中的动员风险和污染风险催生了国家的控制战略和主导策略。在制度上,控制战略限制了以环保NGO为载体的结构资本生长。在行为上,控制战略限制了国家的策略集并形成主导策略,主导策略塑造出国家与环保NGO的"主导-附庸"关系、国家与公众的"治理-依赖"关系,使环保NGO成为政府治理工具、公众舆论工具,并表现为附庸角色和机会主义行为。在意识上,环保NGO的角色与行为弱化了自身主体意识和效能意识,降低了公众对环保NGO的互惠信任意愿,而国家现实绩效的提升会加剧该状况,最终阻碍认知资本生长。综上,基于对环境治理的分析,本文展现了国家从结构到认知两个层面上对社会资本生长所构成的抑制效应。但在不同治理领域或个案中,国家会因治理的环境特征而表现出策略差异,使本文结论不宜被直接推广至其它经验中。
[Abstract]:Based on the background of environmental governance in contemporary China, this paper analyzes three cases of environmental protection events and discusses the influence mechanism of the state on the growth of social capital by means of qualitative and mixed research methods. Mobilization risk and pollution risk in environmental governance give birth to national control strategy and dominant strategy. In the system, the control strategy limits the growth of the structural capital based on the environmental protection NGO. In behavior, the control strategy limits the national strategy collection and forms the dominant strategy. The dominant strategy shapes the "leader-client" relationship between the state and the environmental protection NGO, and the "governance-dependence" relationship between the state and the public. The environmental protection NGO becomes the government governance tool, the public opinion tool, and manifests as the vassal role and the opportunism behavior. In consciousness, the role and behavior of environmental protection NGO weakens its own subjective consciousness and efficiency consciousness, reduces the public's willingness to trust environmental protection NGO mutually, and the improvement of national actual performance will aggravate this situation and ultimately hinder the growth of cognitive capital. In summary, based on the analysis of environmental governance, this paper shows the inhibitory effect of the state on the growth of social capital from the two aspects of structure and cognition. However, in different governance fields or cases, countries will show different strategies because of the environmental characteristics of governance, so the conclusion of this paper should not be directly extended to other experiences.
【作者单位】：中山大学中国公共管理研究中心;中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大招标项目(13&ZD041)
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】