基于数据包络分析的某高等医科院校科研绩效评价
[Abstract]:Objective since the 21st century, the society has been developing continuously, the strength of colleges and universities has been continuously strengthened, and colleges and universities are the main position of teaching and educating people and cultivating talents. How to make efficient use of more and more input resources has become an important problem in colleges and universities. By comparing and analyzing the changes of scientific research resources and the efficiency of scientific research activities in a medical college since the 11th Five-Year Plan, this study provides a reference for promoting the improvement of scientific research performance and the scientific development of colleges and universities. Methods on the basis of literature study, we selected the input (research funds, number of subjects, scientific research personnel) and output (scientific research papers, patent applications and authorizations) of the medical college during the period of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan and the Twelfth Five-Year Plan. A total of 6 aspects of the corresponding index data. The data envelopment analysis (DEA), which has obvious advantages in multi-input and multi-output analysis, is used to analyze the data of the medical college, and the statistical method is used to analyze the factors. Secondly, interview managers, young and middle-aged teachers and experts and professors through case interviews to complete the qualitative analysis of theory. Results the amount of research funds accumulated in this school was 1.28805 billion yuan, which showed an overall upward trend, and the number of researchers with senior title and intermediate title did not fluctuate, and the average annual growth rate of Shuo Ph.D. graduate students was 13.9%. The results of DEA analysis show that the research performance of the school is relatively effective and scale reward unchanged in the past ten years, only 2010 and 2011 are DEA weak efficiency and non-DEA efficiency. The regression equation of factor analysis results shows that the number of patents depends on the investment of scientific research funds. CSTPCD is influenced by senior professional titles and graduate students. The number of SCI mainly increases with the increase of the number of graduate students, so it is impossible to establish a model for the number of scientific research awards. Interview, the main problem expressed in the transformation of scientific research results is not high. Conclusion to improve the innovation ability is an important prerequisite for the reform and development of scientific research management. In order to expand and progress continuously in the new period, colleges and universities must make clear the overall goal, the main task, the performance index and the important method to measure the achievement of the goal. Finding the right center of work, arranging the team reasonably and determining the expectations are the necessary conditions for the healthy development of colleges and universities.
【学位授予单位】:重庆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G644
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 钟灿涛;张铭;周辉;;开放获取与大学科研绩效评价的相互影响研究[J];科研管理;2009年S1期
2 李敏;;高校科研绩效评价体系的建立[J];泰安教育学院学报岱宗学刊;2009年03期
3 陈党生;;浅析高校教师科研绩效评价体系的构建[J];内江科技;2009年11期
4 沈意文;刘娟娟;;灰关联度分析法在高校人文社科科研绩效评价中的应用[J];科技管理研究;2010年22期
5 刘娟娟;;灰关联聚类法在高校科研绩效评价中的应用研究[J];云南科技管理;2011年05期
6 林春丽;;高校人文社科科研绩效评价方式的科学性探讨[J];评价与管理;2011年03期
7 易静;张亮;;高校人文社科科研绩效评价体系探讨[J];教育教学论坛;2012年35期
8 王雅芝;高校院(系)级科研绩效评价指标体系研究[J];中国煤炭经济学院学报;2001年04期
9 张东旭,罗长坤,周林,杨勇,张宁;医学院校科研绩效评价问题的探讨[J];技术与创新管理;2004年04期
10 彭博文,黄武;高校科研绩效评价指标体系构建探讨[J];康定民族师范高等专科学校学报;2005年03期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 张磊;陈建华;;关于高校科研绩效评价的研究[A];高效 清洁 安全 电力发展与和谐社会建设——吉林省电机工程学会2008年学术年会论文集[C];2008年
2 张淑兰;张鹏;肖玉平;;某医学高校创新团队科研绩效评价指标体系的构建[A];中华医学会第十三次全国医学科学研究管理学学术会议暨2012第四届全国医学科研管理论坛论文集[C];2012年
3 许作铭;赵中洲;;完善高校科研评价指标体系的思考[A];创新沈阳文集(B)[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 吴山弟;为“逼良为娼论”一辩[N];上海科技报;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 孙怡;基于平衡计分卡原理的军医大学科研绩效评价指标体系的研究[D];第三军医大学;2015年
2 任美霖;地方研究型大学科研绩效评价研究[D];山西大学;2014年
3 迟睿;K大学经管学院科研绩效评价体系设计及应用[D];江苏科技大学;2016年
4 王海清;S大学科研绩效评价体系研究[D];山东大学;2017年
5 蔡爱丽;高职院校教师科研绩效评价研究[D];南京理工大学;2013年
6 乔开文;我国研究型大学科研绩效评价指标体系研究[D];兰州大学;2009年
7 何敏;甘肃省高等学校科研绩效评价研究[D];兰州大学;2014年
8 周娟娟;基于修正BSC的大学科研绩效评价体系研究[D];武汉理工大学;2008年
9 刘野;基于综合DEA评价模型的我国“985”高校科研绩效评价研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2013年
10 江涛;基于DEA的农业高校科研绩效评价研究[D];四川农业大学;2009年
,本文编号:2372971
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2372971.html