科研实体科研绩效的评价及实证研究
发布时间：2018-12-27 12:22
【摘要】：[目的/意义]由于学科之间发文量、引用量的差异,同时注意到科研实体(如机构、研究团队或个人)的学术成果涉及多学科,针对科研评价体系设计一种标准化计算框架,消除由于不同学科的差异性带来的科研绩效不可比性,并且将科研实体属于不同学科的学术成果有效地加以综合表征。[方法/过程]从科研总量、科研质量和前沿研究三个角度设计标准化指标,从而构建了一套适用于不同科研实体的科研评价指标体系,以四川大学为例,选取单个科研人员、研究团队以及ESI学科三个不同层面的科研实体进行评价。[结果/结论]从实证分析中可以看到,该评价体系能将同一科研实体属于不同学科的学术成果有效地加以综合表征,不仅消除了科研实体之间由于学科差异造成的影响,并且可以推广至个人、研究团队以及机构等不同层面的科研实体科研绩效评价,同时也希望为其它科研评价体系的标准化处理提供一种思路和方法。
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] because of the differences in the number of papers and citations between disciplines, and noting that the academic results of scientific research entities (such as institutions, research teams or individuals) involve multiple disciplines, a standardized computing framework is designed for scientific research evaluation systems, It eliminates the incomparability of scientific research performance caused by the differences of different disciplines and effectively represents the academic achievements of scientific research entities belonging to different disciplines. [methods] the standardized indexes were designed from three angles of total scientific research amount, scientific research quality and frontier research, and a set of scientific research evaluation index system suitable for different scientific research entities was constructed. Taking Sichuan University as an example, a single scientific research personnel was selected. Research teams and research entities at three different levels of the ESI discipline were evaluated. [results / conclusions] it can be seen from the empirical analysis that the evaluation system can effectively represent the academic achievements of the same scientific research entity belonging to different disciplines, and not only eliminate the influence of the differences between scientific research entities, It can also be extended to the evaluation of scientific research performance of scientific research entities at different levels, such as individuals, research teams and institutions. At the same time, it also hopes to provide a way of thinking and method for the standardization of other scientific research evaluation systems.
【作者单位】： 四川大学图书馆;
【基金】：四川大学2017年度“图书馆、情报与文献学”项目“双一流建设背景下高校科研实体学术影响力的多维度评价体系设计”(编号:sktq201725) 四川大学2016年青年教师科研启动基金项目“学科标准化的科研评估指标体系构建及实证研究”(编号:2016SCU11059)研究成果之一
【分类号】：G311;G353.1
本文编号：2393055
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] because of the differences in the number of papers and citations between disciplines, and noting that the academic results of scientific research entities (such as institutions, research teams or individuals) involve multiple disciplines, a standardized computing framework is designed for scientific research evaluation systems, It eliminates the incomparability of scientific research performance caused by the differences of different disciplines and effectively represents the academic achievements of scientific research entities belonging to different disciplines. [methods] the standardized indexes were designed from three angles of total scientific research amount, scientific research quality and frontier research, and a set of scientific research evaluation index system suitable for different scientific research entities was constructed. Taking Sichuan University as an example, a single scientific research personnel was selected. Research teams and research entities at three different levels of the ESI discipline were evaluated. [results / conclusions] it can be seen from the empirical analysis that the evaluation system can effectively represent the academic achievements of the same scientific research entity belonging to different disciplines, and not only eliminate the influence of the differences between scientific research entities, It can also be extended to the evaluation of scientific research performance of scientific research entities at different levels, such as individuals, research teams and institutions. At the same time, it also hopes to provide a way of thinking and method for the standardization of other scientific research evaluation systems.
【作者单位】： 四川大学图书馆;
【基金】：四川大学2017年度“图书馆、情报与文献学”项目“双一流建设背景下高校科研实体学术影响力的多维度评价体系设计”(编号:sktq201725) 四川大学2016年青年教师科研启动基金项目“学科标准化的科研评估指标体系构建及实证研究”(编号:2016SCU11059)研究成果之一
【分类号】：G311;G353.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 冯花朴;;InCites数据库科研绩效评估的有效工具[J];现代情报;2014年01期
2 何惠芬;陈欣;;基于InCites数据库声学领域的科研绩效评估分析[J];情报探索;2013年05期
3 卫世平;建立社科界同行单位科研绩效分析数据库的思考[J];前沿;2003年10期
4 丁福虎;张水潮;;利用CNKI和H指数评价大学科研绩效[J];科技管理研究;2010年13期
，本文编号：2393055
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2393055.html
