论保管箱业务的法律性质与风险应对

发布时间：2018-04-14 00:12

  本文选题：金融服务 + 保管箱　； 参考：《武汉金融》2012年11期

【摘要】：当前商业银行保管箱业务快速发展,已成为商业银行中间业务收入的一个重要增长点,但与此同时也引发了诸多法律纠纷,在一定程度上影响到了与客户关系和银行商誉。从我国现行法律来看,对保管箱业务未作明确界定,理论上对保管箱合同的法律性质也甚有争议,司法实践中的判决也认识不一。本文将以实践中的相关判例为切入点,结合法律相关规定和学理论证保管箱业务的法律性质,并提出完善合同、防范风险的有关措施。
[Abstract]:At present, the rapid development of the safekeeping box business of commercial banks has become an important growth point of intermediate business income of commercial banks, but at the same time, it has also caused many legal disputes, which to some extent has affected the relationship with customers and the goodwill of banks.From the point of view of the current law of our country, there is no clear definition of the business of the safekeeping box, and the legal nature of the contract of the safekeeping box is also very controversial in theory, and the judgment in the judicial practice is also different.This article will take the relevant case law in practice as the breakthrough point, unifies the law correlation stipulation and the study theory proof box business legal nature, and will propose the consummation contract, the guard against the risk related measure.
【作者单位】： 中国建设银行湖北省分行;
【分类号】：D922.281;F832.2

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵江涛;;论我国监护制度的立法完善[J];安阳师范学院学报;2005年06期

2 张瑞萍;从“代际公平”理论反思民事主体制度的价值[J];比较法研究;2003年05期

3 张丽英;船舶优先权法律性质若干学说析[J];比较法研究;2004年04期

4 霍艳丽;浅论我国建筑物区分所有权中成员权的若干法律问题[J];长春师范学院学报;2005年04期

5 余延满,冉克平;继承回复请求权研究[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2003年05期

6 丁丽柏;王，

本文编号：1746841