科学家创新力评价模型及实证研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 11:35

本文选题：科学家 + 创新力　；参考：《情报杂志》2016年03期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]开展科学家创新力评价工作对资源匹配、人才引进、人才评价等都具有极为重要的理论意义和现实意义。然而,当前针对科学家的评价指标多为单一指标,综合性指标研究较少,不能全面衡量科学家的创新力。为此,本文的目的是在借鉴现有创新力和竞争力评价的理论和方法基础上,设计用于科学家创新力评价的综合性模型。[方法/过程]在文献15所构建的科研单元创新力评价模型的理论基础上,结合科学家创新力的实际特点并考虑可操作性,设计出包含了人才计划、SCI论文数、授权发明专利数、复合合作强度、篇均被引频次和国际任职等6个指标的科学家创新力评价模型。[结果/结论]论文在实证分析部分选取中国科学院的40位工业生物技术领域的科学家进行了比较分析工作,验证了科学家创新力评价六元模型可以反映科学家的综合创新力,并克服单一评价指标的片面性问题,较为全面地呈现科学家的创新力。在应用潜力方面,该模型除适用于评价生命科学领域的科学家外,还可以经适当修订应用于其他学科领域。
[Abstract]:Objective / significance: it is of great theoretical and practical significance to carry out the evaluation of scientists' innovation ability for resource matching, talent introduction, talent evaluation and so on. However, the current evaluation index for scientists is mostly a single index, and the comprehensive index research is less, which can not comprehensively measure the innovation ability of scientists. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to design a comprehensive model for evaluating the innovation ability of scientists on the basis of the existing theories and methods of evaluation of innovation ability and competitiveness. [method / process] based on the theory of the evaluation model of innovation ability of scientific research unit constructed in reference 15, combining with the actual characteristics of the innovation ability of scientists and considering the feasibility, the author designs the number of papers containing the talent plan and the number of invention patents authorized. The evaluation model of scientist's innovation ability based on complex cooperation intensity, citation frequency and international employment. [results / conclusion] in the part of empirical analysis, 40 scientists in the field of industrial biotechnology from the Chinese Academy of Sciences were selected for comparative analysis, and it was verified that the six-element model of evaluating scientists' innovation ability can reflect the comprehensive innovation ability of scientists. And overcome the one-sidedness problem of single evaluation index, and present the innovation ability of the scientist more comprehensively. In terms of application potential, the model is suitable for evaluating scientists in the field of life sciences, and can also be modified and applied to other disciplines.
【作者单位】：中国科学院成都文献情报中心;
【基金】：“中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目——工业生物技术知识服务研究与应用”(编号:KSCX2-KW-G-9) “国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)——微生物数字资源知识管理系统构建及关键技术研究”(编号:2014AA021503)资助
【分类号】：G353.1;G316

【相似文献】