科研项目同行评议中专家诚信体系建设研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 23:37

本文选题：科研项目 + 同行评议　；参考：《天津大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：“国家中长期科技发展规划纲要(2006-2020)”中指出:到2020年,中国科技进步对经济增长的贡献率要提高到60%左右,研发投入占GDP比重要提高到2.5%。随着政府和社会对科技投入的不断加大,科研项目资金越来越多,如何合理、公平地配置科研资源,评价科研成果,促使科研项目有重点地发展,更好地服务于创新型国家的建设,同行评议成为保证科研质量最为主要的方式之一。同行评议专家的诚信直接影响着科研项目评审的结果和质量,现实社会中学风浮躁和学术不端等不良行为的出现,专家失信案件的曝光,学术界受到越来越多的质疑,科研诚信和学风建设成为党和国家、社会高度关注的话题。论文定量分析与定性分析相结合,综合运用文献研究、国际比较研究、访谈调研和模拟实验方法对当前我国科研项目同行评议中专家诚信现状进行分析,深入探讨专家诚信体系的建立健全,并提出有针对性的专家诚信体系建设的对策建议。论文首先通过理论分析,确定影响专家诚信的可能原因。其次,比较借鉴国外典型科研管理机构同行评议的管理措施和办法,进而综合分析了目前我国科研项目同行评议的现状和专家诚信的现状。然后,结合教育部与天津市科研管理部门的访谈和天津市近年来同行评议数据的定量分析,并辅之以小范围的实验模拟对专家诚信影响因素进行深入分析。最后,建立我国科研项目同行评议专家诚信体系,并针对科研机构提出提升同行评议专家诚信的对策建议。
[Abstract]:In the outline of the National Medium- and Long-Term Science and Technology Development Plan 2006-2020, it is pointed out that by 2020, the contribution rate of China's scientific and technological progress to economic growth will be increased to about 60 percent, and the proportion of R & D investment to GDP will increase to 2.5 percent. With the increasing investment of the government and society in science and technology, more and more funds for scientific research projects. How to allocate scientific research resources reasonably and fairly, evaluate scientific research results, and promote the development of scientific research projects, Peer review has become one of the most important ways to guarantee the quality of scientific research. The integrity of peer review experts has a direct impact on the results and quality of the evaluation of scientific research projects. In reality, the emergence of bad behaviors such as impetuosity and academic misconduct in the society, the exposure of cases of expert dishonesty, the academic circles are more and more questioned. The construction of scientific integrity and style of study has become a topic of great concern to the Party and the country and society. This paper combines quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and analyzes the present situation of experts' integrity in peer review of scientific research projects in China by comprehensive use of literature research, international comparative research, interview and simulation experiment methods. This paper probes into the establishment and perfection of the expert credit system, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the construction of the expert credit system. Firstly, through theoretical analysis, the paper determines the possible reasons that affect the integrity of experts. Secondly, the paper compares the management measures and methods of peer review of typical foreign scientific research management institutions, and then comprehensively analyzes the status quo of peer review of scientific research projects in China and the status of integrity of experts. Then, combined with the interview between the Ministry of Education and Tianjin Scientific Research Management Department and the quantitative analysis of the peer review data in Tianjin in recent years, the factors that affect the integrity of experts are deeply analyzed with a small scale of experimental simulation. Finally, the author establishes the system of peer review experts' integrity in our country's scientific research projects, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for scientific research institutions to promote peer review experts' integrity.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：G322

【参考文献】