当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 生产管理论文 >

中国物流业与制造业的联动发展研究

发布时间:2019-02-14 22:50
【摘要】:自中国对外开放以来,中国制造业借由劳动禀赋承接了大量发达国家加工组装等工序的产业转移。据资料显示,中国制造业所有行业的垂直专业化率都超过了20%,其中电子通讯设备,通用专用设备制造、电气机械、仪表等技术密集型行业垂直化专业化率超过40%。这一事实反应了中国制造业整体的自主研发能力弱,产品附加值低的现状。同时,中国物流业的总体发展水平仍然偏低,呈现效率低,费用高,规模小等问题。两业的联动发展将是破解中国物流业,制造业难以发展,相互抑制这一死循环的一个重要途径。因此,课题围绕两联动特征,联动水平,不同地区差异及未来发展趋势具有现实必要性。研究成果能够为企业及学者清楚认识中国目前两业联动水平及基本特征提供依据,,能够为认知中国两业联动的未来趋势提供了依据,具实践意义。 基于投入产出法,通过1995,2002,2007中国,英国,美国,日本及巴西的直接消耗系数比较及趋势分析,发现中国物流业依靠实物要素投入为主,对自身及其他服务业的依赖很低,与其他三个物流强国刚好相反;化工类制造业与物流业间的互动表现明显活跃于其他制造类子行业;两业联动的一个重要特征表现为物流业对制造业的需求会逐渐转变为对自身或其他服务业的需求,最终将强于对制造业的需求。同时,通过格兰杰因果检验及中国30个省份的直接消耗系数比较,进一步发现中国制造业的发展对物流业的发展没有起到显著的拉动作用,两业呈现非对称状态;处在中国工业水平第三阶层的省份的物流业水平偏低,需要付出超出全国平均水平的物流消耗才能支撑当地的制造业需求。上海,北京,江苏,天津,内蒙古五省市呈现较高水平的两业联动,广东,浙江,山东,辽宁,福建五省两业的联动水平较低。最后从政府及企业角度提出应区别对待物流业与制造业的联动模式,区别对待东中西地区的两业联动;区别对待制造业各子行业与物流业的联动。
[Abstract]:Since China's opening to the outside world, China's manufacturing industry has taken advantage of labor endowment to undertake industrial transfer of processing and assembly processes in a large number of developed countries. According to the data, the vertical specialization rate of all industries in China's manufacturing industry has exceeded 20%. Among them, the vertical specialization rate of electronic communication equipment, general purpose equipment manufacturing, electrical machinery, instrumentation and other technology-intensive industries is over 40%. This fact reflects China's manufacturing industry as a whole weak independent R & D capacity, low value-added products. At the same time, the overall development level of Chinese logistics industry is still low, low efficiency, high cost, small scale and so on. The linkage development of the two industries will be an important way to crack the logistics industry in China, and it is difficult for the manufacturing industry to develop and restrain this dead cycle mutually. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on the characteristics of two linkage, the level of linkage, the difference of different regions and the trend of future development. The research results can provide a basis for enterprises and scholars to clearly understand the current level and basic characteristics of China's two-industry linkage, and provide a basis for understanding the future trend of China's two-industry linkage, which is of practical significance. Based on the input-output method, by comparing the direct consumption coefficients of China, Britain, the United States, Japan and Brazil in 1995 / 2002 / 2007, it is found that the logistics industry in China relies mainly on the input of physical elements and has a low dependence on itself and other service industries. The opposite is true of the other three logistics powers; The interaction between chemical industry and logistics industry is obviously active in other manufacturing sub-industries. An important feature of the linkage between the two industries is that the logistics industry's demand for manufacturing industry will gradually change into the demand for itself or other service industries, which will eventually be stronger than the demand for manufacturing industry. At the same time, through Granger causality test and direct consumption coefficient comparison of 30 provinces in China, it is further found that the development of Chinese manufacturing industry has no significant pull on the development of logistics industry, and the two industries show asymmetric state; China's third-class industrial provinces have low levels of logistics and need to pay more than the national average to support local manufacturing demand. Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu, Tianjin and Inner Mongolia show a higher level of two industries linkage, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Shandong, Liaoning, Fujian, five provinces have a lower level of linkage. Finally, from the angle of government and enterprise, this paper puts forward that the linkage mode of logistics and manufacturing industry should be treated differently, the linkage between East, West and West, and the linkage between each sub-industry of manufacturing industry and logistics industry should be treated differently.
【学位授予单位】:浙江理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F259.2;F424

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈伟达;张宇;;生产者服务业对制造业竞争力提升的影响研究——基于我国投入产出表的实证分析[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年03期

2 植草益;信息通讯业的产业融合[J];中国工业经济;2001年02期

3 周振华;产业融合:产业发展及经济增长的新动力[J];中国工业经济;2003年04期

4 胡晓鹏;;产业共生:理论界定及其内在机理[J];中国工业经济;2008年09期

5 吕涛;聂锐;;产业联动的内涵理论依据及表现形式[J];工业技术经济;2007年05期

6 张世贤;工业投资效率与产业结构变动的实证研究——兼与郭克莎博士商榷[J];管理世界;2000年05期

7 张沛东;;区域制造业与生产性服务业耦合协调度分析——基于中国29个省级区域的实证研究[J];开发研究;2010年02期

8 钟韵,闫小培;西方地理学界关于生产性服务业作用研究述评[J];人文地理;2005年03期

9 王珍珍;陈功玉;;我国制造业不同子行业与物流业联动发展协调度实证研究——基于灰色关联模型[J];上海财经大学学报;2010年03期

10 王军虎;;我国制造业与服务业的灰色关联分析[J];商场现代化;2006年36期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 侯汉平;多重复合适应性X方物流形成机理研究[D];北京交通大学;2009年

2 薛辉;产业集群与区域物流协作模式研究[D];北京交通大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 王金武;我国生产性服务业和制造业互动分析及其对策研究[D];武汉理工大学;2005年

2 胡蔚波;制造企业物流联盟模式研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

3 朱琳;物流业与制造业的协同发展研究[D];大连海事大学;2010年

4 张玉梅;化工区物流设施布局规划研究[D];北京交通大学;2012年



本文编号:2422685

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/shengchanguanlilunwen/2422685.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ec2e1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com