中国财政农业投入的效应及规模分析
发布时间:2018-04-21 08:26
本文选题:财政政策 + 财政投入规模 ; 参考:《北京交通大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:农业是一国经济中的基础产业,也是弱势产业。农业发展的重要性和弱势性,使得一国政府对农业的支持政策成为了必然选择。综观世界各国,为了促进本国的农业发展都采取了在国际贸易允许范围内的保护政策。改革开放之后,我国也出台了一系列保护我国农业发展的财政政策。这些财政政策及财政资金对于我国农业经济的发展起到了很大的促进作用。 本文分析了我国财政农业投入政策的历史沿革,并针对目前我国财政农业投入规模进行研究,包括财政农业投入的绝对规模和相对规模两个方面。本文根据粮食供给状况,将我国分为粮食主产区、主销区、产销平衡区三大区域,并分别研究财政农业投入政策对各个区域的农业经济总量、粮食产量以及农民收入的影响程度。通过分析界定最优财政农业投入规模的方法,构建最优财政农业投入规模模型,运用柯布道格拉斯生产函数分别确定主产区、主销区、产销平衡区的最优财政农业投入规模。最后得出我国区域间农业的财政投入规模差异显著,三大区域农业财政投入效果差异显著,主产区及产销平衡区农业的财政投入规模需调整的结论,并针对目前我国财政农业投入政策中的问题提出相应的解决对策。
[Abstract]:Agriculture is the basic and disadvantaged industry in a country's economy. The importance and weakness of agricultural development makes the government's policy of supporting agriculture a necessary choice. A comprehensive view of all countries in the world has adopted a protection policy in international trade in order to promote the development of the country's agriculture. After the reform and opening up, our country also A series of financial policies to protect the development of agriculture in China have been introduced. These financial policies and financial funds have played a great role in promoting the development of our agricultural economy.
This paper analyzes the historical evolution of China's fiscal and agricultural investment policy, and studies the scale of financial and agricultural input in China, including two aspects of the absolute scale and relative scale of the financial and agricultural input. According to the condition of grain supply, this paper divides China into three major regions, the main grain production areas, the main sales areas and the balance zone of production and marketing. Through the analysis and definition of the optimal financial agricultural input scale method, the optimal financial agricultural input scale model is constructed by analyzing and defining the optimal financial agricultural input scale. The main production areas, the main sales areas and the balance zone of production and marketing are determined by the Cobb Douglas production function. The final conclusion is that the difference of the financial input of the interregional agriculture is significant, the difference of the effect of agricultural financial input in the three major regions is significant, the financial input of agriculture in the main production and production and marketing balance areas should be adjusted, and the corresponding solutions are put forward to the problems in the current fiscal and agricultural investment policies of our country. Countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F812.8;F323
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 廉桂萍;加大财政对农业的支持力度不断提高农业的竞争力[J];北方经济;2003年10期
2 郭玉清;;中国财政农业投入最优规模实证分析[J];财经问题研究;2006年05期
3 朱海洋;入世"后我国农业支持政策取向的思考[J];财经研究;2002年09期
4 马国贤,缪惠频;论公共财政框架建设的三位一体模式——兼论深化部门预算改革的途径[J];财政研究;2004年03期
5 侯石安;解决“三农”问题的财政支持政策选择[J];财政研究;2005年03期
6 马静;霍学喜;;河南省财政农业支持对粮食生产影响的实证分析[J];西北工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
7 侯石安;;粮食安全与财政补贴政策的优化[J];管理世界;2008年11期
8 李有定;甘肃省财政支出存在的问题、成因及对策[J];甘肃社会科学;2001年04期
9 徐建军;星焱;;财政支农粮食产出效应的区域比较研究[J];财政研究;2013年01期
10 周小斌,李秉龙;中国农业财政支出的政策取向[J];河北学刊;2002年02期
,本文编号:1781655
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/1781655.html