国有土地出让市场分化区域差异研究——基于治理土地财政视角

发布时间：2018-05-06 07:12

本文选题：国有土地市场 + 分化　；参考：《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：土地财政激励地方政府分别采用招拍挂、协议方式出让商服与工矿用地,国家致力于国有土地市场建设,各省(市)两种土地出让方式的出让面积、出让金规模、出让价格和两种方式价格比、市场化程度等9项指标之间逐渐分化。采用变异系数与聚类分析及定性分析方法,将2003~2014年31省(市)国有土地市场分化程度划分为高度、中度、中低度、低度4类区域,比较各项指标得出主要结论:(1)协议与招拍挂方式的国有土地出让面积、出让金规模呈现"此消彼长"趋势,即市场化程度在提升,"中度"区域最明显;(2)后城市化时期的"高度"区域不在依赖土地财政,"中度"区域则完全相反;(3)招拍挂与协议价格比值高低和区域分化程度一致,且呈现先分化、后整合的趋势;(4)城镇化过程中地方政府大都采取先协议"以地引资"、再招拍挂出让商服用地的策略,"中度"区域最明显。从控制高价"地王"频出现象、约束地方政府以地引资行为、开展土地整治并允许农村建设用地入市、城市公共建设鼓励社会资本参与、土地开发与生态补偿并行机制等方面,构建土地财政转型视角下的国有土地市场分化区域调控政策。
[Abstract]:Local governments are encouraged by the land finance to sell commercial services and industrial and mining land by means of contract, the state is committed to the construction of the state-owned land market, the transfer area of the two land transfer modes of each province (city), and the scale of the transfer fee, Selling price and two ways of price ratio, marketization degree and other nine indicators gradually divided. By using the methods of coefficient of variation, cluster analysis and qualitative analysis, the differentiation degree of the state-owned land market in 31 provinces (cities) from 2003 to 2014 was divided into four categories: high, medium, medium and low. Comparing the main conclusions of the various indicators, we can draw the main conclusions: (1) the area of state-owned land transfer under the agreement and the auction and hanging mode, and the scale of the transfer fee shows a trend of "rising and falling from one another" to the other. That is, the degree of marketization is increasing, the "high" area in the post-urbanization period is not dependent on land finance, and the "moderate" area is completely opposite to the other three) the ratio of the bid price to the agreement price is the same as the degree of regional differentiation. In the process of urbanization, most of the local governments adopt the strategy of first agreeing to "attract investment by land", and then the strategy of hanging the transferee to take the land, the "moderate" region is the most obvious. From the aspects of controlling the frequent occurrence of "land kings" at high prices, restricting local governments' behavior of attracting capital by land, carrying out land regulation and allowing rural construction land to enter the market, urban public construction encourages the participation of social capital, and the parallel mechanism of land development and ecological compensation, and so on. To construct the regional regulation and control policy of state-owned land market differentiation from the perspective of land finance transformation.
【作者单位】：东北大学文法学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目:“基于地域差异的后土地财政时期负效应及转型研究”(41401635) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目:“中国土地财政区域差异及后续负效应研究”(14YJC790128) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目:“土地财政与城市化关系地域差异及调控政策研究”(N141402001)
【分类号】：F301;F812.2

【相似文献】