援助之手、攫取之手与民生类公共品供给

发布时间：2018-06-07 02:51

本文选题：渠道检验 + 转移支付　；参考：《财经论丛》2015年06期

【摘要】：本文基于新税收集权理论,通过提出三个假设来验证援助之手、攫取之手与民生类公共品供给间的影响效应。通过构造分省的民生类公共品供给指数、转移支付与"两只手"面板数据与模型,实证分析发现:第一,援助之手对民生类公共品供给具有正向效应,但是其激励效应受到了攫取之手的显著抑制。第二,分地区考察中,"两只手"的治理模式对民生类公共品供给影响存在地区异质性差异,攫取之手对公共品供给的负面效应在税收净流入地区更大。第三,与援助之手类似,中央转移支付对公共品供给具有促进作用,但同样受到了攫取之手的抑制。最后,本文从三个方面提出了完善优化"两只手"治理模式对民生类公共品供给的相关政策启示与建议。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of the new tax collection right, this paper puts forward three hypotheses to verify the effect of the hand of aid, the hand grabbing and the supply of the public goods of the people's livelihood. Through the construction of the provincial public goods supply index of the people's livelihood, the data and model of the transfer payment and the "two hands" panel are found. The first is to find the hand of the aid to the public goods of the people's livelihood. Supply has a positive effect, but its incentive effect is significantly inhibited by the grabbing hand. Second, in the regional survey, the effect of "two hands" on the supply of public goods is different in regional heterogeneity, and the negative effect of the hand on the supply of public goods is greater in the area of net tax inflow. Third, and the hand of aid. It seems that the central transfer payment has a promoting effect on the supply of public goods, but it is also restrained by the grabbing hand. Finally, this paper puts forward some policy implications and suggestions on improving the supply of public goods of the people's livelihood by optimizing the "two hands" management mode from three aspects.
【作者单位】：景德镇陶瓷学院工商学院;中国人民大学经济学院;
【基金】：江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地资助项目(JD1386)
【分类号】：F812.45

【参考文献】