我国个人所得税分类征收模式评析
[Abstract]:Although the current individual income tax classified collection mode in our country can carry out the collection and management work normally and raise a considerable amount of financial revenue, the drawback of the lack of tax fairness in the classified collection mode is gradually emerging. Therefore, our government has repeatedly proposed to establish a personal income tax collection model which combines classification with integration, but there is still a great deal of controversy about the reform of the collection model. This paper holds that before discussing the reform of the classified levy model, we should first make a comprehensive assessment of the classified levy model, and have a good understanding of its advantages and disadvantages, and take the existing problems as the core of the reform. On this basis, the reform of personal income tax in the future is moderately prospected. This paper holds that, considering the functions of individual income tax, the tax classification should follow the principles of finance, fairness and efficiency. Specifically, this paper holds that the classified levy model can better reflect the fiscal principle: although the classified levy model has the violation of the fiscal principle, it can be seen as a whole. It can guarantee the timely collection of tax in the low level of collection and management, which reflects the fiscal principle; the classified collection model violates the principle of fairness, although the classified collection model embodies the principle of fairness in some tax system design. However, the tax system design, including tax items, tax rates, expense deductions and so on, has a lot of contrary to the principle of fairness. The classified tax collection model well embodies the efficiency principle: the tax system design is relatively simple under the classified tax collection model. The cost of taxation is relatively low, and although it may not be conducive to the cultivation of tax awareness, it generally reflects the principle of efficiency. In a word, the advantage of the individual income tax classification in our country lies in that it can reflect the fiscal principle and efficiency principle of tax, and the deficiency is that there are many violations to the principle of fairness.
【学位授予单位】:首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F812.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张奕;;大数据时代下网络交易征税的国际比较及经验借鉴[J];企业导报;2016年20期
2 李炜光;陈辰;;以家庭为单位征收个人所得税的制度设计问题——基于三种所得税征收模式的讨论[J];南方经济;2014年08期
3 蔡秀云;周晓君;;我国个人所得税调节收入分配效应研析[J];税务研究;2014年07期
4 孙章伟;;日本基尼系数与再分配制度研究[J];现代日本经济;2013年02期
5 任致伟;;税收在公平收入分配中的局限性研究[J];经济研究参考;2013年11期
6 刘尚希;;按家庭征个人所得税会更公平吗?——兼论我国个人所得税改革的方向[J];涉外税务;2012年10期
7 李林木;;个人所得税征管中第三方信息的获取与应用:基于国际比较的视角[J];税务研究;2011年12期
8 贾康;梁季;;我国个人所得税改革的回顾与展望[J];中国财政;2011年20期
9 高培勇;;迈出走向综合与分类相结合个人所得税制度的脚步[J];中国财政;2011年18期
10 刘隆亨;;我国个税优势和不足以及改革完善的思考[J];税收征纳;2011年06期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王长宇;中国税收成本问题研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2016年
2 徐晔;我国个人所得税现行课税模式的弊端分析与改革研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
3 崔志坤;中国个人所得税制度改革研究[D];财政部财政科学研究所;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李瑞玲;从个人所得税流失论我国个人所得税税制改革[D];北京交通大学;2013年
2 董巍峰;基于公平视角下的我国个人所得税研究[D];上海师范大学;2012年
,本文编号:2257683
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2257683.html