典型性治理:一种地方政府治理模式的总结——以Y省W县社会管理创新模范镇建设实践为例

发布时间：2018-02-27 13:26

本文关键词： 治理典型性治理政府治理模式　出处：《云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：典型性治理主要生发于中国基层社会,在当前的晋升锦标赛体制和压力型体制之下,基层政府为了能够在短时间内取得治理成效,往往选取一些典型区域做重点投入和精心打造。典型性治理的优势在于,当上级部门的任务下达之后,受考评压力驱动,资源有限的情况下,可以将有限的资源集中于一点,在短时间内制造出"亮点",使其发挥出"示范效应"。其缺陷在于,"示范点"的典型作用发挥以大量资源和政策的倾斜为前提,容易造成马太效应的产生,优者更优,劣者更劣,对于区域均衡发展造成极大障碍,也不利于各区域之间公平正义的实现。就其本质而言,典型性治理在宏观层面体现出现有社会治理手段的低下与治理方式的粗放,在微观层面反映出上级政府对下级政府评价和评估水平尚有待提升。
[Abstract]:Typical governance comes mainly from the grass-roots society in China. Under the current promotion championship system and the pressure-type system, grass-roots governments can achieve governance results in a short period of time. Typical governance has the advantage of being driven by the pressure of evaluation and limited resources to concentrate its limited resources on a single point. Creating a "bright spot" in a short period of time, making it play a "demonstration effect". Its defect is that the typical role of the "demonstration site" is based on the premise of a large amount of resources and policy inclination, which easily leads to the generation of the Matthew effect, where the superior is better and the worse is worse. The balanced development of the region creates great obstacles and is not conducive to the realization of fairness and justice among the regions. In its essence, typical governance reflects the low level of social governance means and the extensive way of governance at the macro level. The microcosmic level reflects that the evaluation and evaluation level of the superior government to the lower government still needs to be improved.
【作者单位】：云南行政学院学报编辑部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“包容性发展视阈下我国农村社会管理创新研究”(13CKS018) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目“征地拆迁冲突的协同治理与民主协商研究”(13YJC810013) 云南省委党校专项课题“新型农村经济合作组织参与精准扶贫的模式研究”(2016XT19) 2016年湖北省重点(培育)学科政治学学科开放研究基金项目“新型农村经济合作组织与基层治理研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】