地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-28 17:46

本文选题：地方政府　切入点：公共政策执行绩效评估　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：继20世纪80年代的新公共管理思潮与重塑政府运动之后,公共政策执行与绩效评估就成为世界各国政府履行诸种政府职能、从事日常公共管理、解决各种社会民生问题、保障公共福利的重要工具,尤其是在当前服务型政府与电子政务平台以及大数据工程蓬勃发展的宏观背景之下,地方政府公共政策绩效评估也逐步成为提升行政效能、增强政府公信力的重要手段。近年来,地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估在理论研究与探索实践层面均取得了一些较具代表性的成果,但由于不同地区的具体域情差异,东中西部的地方政府在该领域的建设与发展呈现出失衡的尴尬局面,而且还存在不同程度的缺漏与瑕疵,基于此,本文认为,如何持续增强公共政策的执行力度与速度、如何针对地方政府政策执行状况进行绩效评估、如何不断完善地方政府公共政策绩效评估的框架体系等问题已经成为学界与地方政府广泛关注思考的时代课题。本文以地方政府的公共政策执行绩效评估为研究对象,以分析问题、解决问题为主要研究路径,主要探讨分析当前中国地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估工作的症结所在与应对之策,本文主要包括五部分:第一部分主要是针对该选题的背景、理论价值与现实意义、国内外研究与实践现状、研究方法与可能的创新点进行了详细阐述。第二部分主要是依据现有书籍论文及报刊等文献资料的相关内容,针对地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估的相关概念、主要特征、逻辑流程、理论基础等基本内容进行了独立思考与细致阐述。第三部分主要探讨分析了当前中国地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估实践的现状与主要问题。现状部分主要列举了一些省市地方政府在公共政策执行绩效评估方面的有益举措与规范性文件。主要问题大致包括:公共政策绩效评估主体存在认知困境、辖区居民与社会组织参与度不强、缺乏科学统一的评估指标体系、评估方法与手段仍需优化、评估结果的应用价值不明显,这些现实症结严重制约了地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估程序的稳定性与评估结果的公信力。第四部分主要是基于现存的主要问题提出了一些较具针对性的对策与建议,大致包括:着力提升地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估人员的价值认知、不断增强地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估的外部参与热情、持续健全地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估的指标体系、不断改善地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估的方法手段、持续强化地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估结果的应用价值,希冀能够为地方政府公共政策执行绩效评估的理论研究与实践操作提供些许参考。第五部分针对本文的主要观点、研究过程中遇到的难题、未来研究展望以及个人后续研究的努力方向进行了简要总结。
[Abstract]:Following the trend of thought of new public management and the movement of reshaping the government in the 1980s, public policy implementation and performance evaluation have become the governments of all countries in the world to perform all kinds of government functions, engage in daily public management, and solve various social and livelihood problems. The important tools to protect public welfare, especially in the macro background of the current service-oriented government, e-government platform and big data Project, the local government public policy performance evaluation has gradually become to enhance the administrative efficiency. In recent years, the performance evaluation of local government public policy implementation has achieved some representative results in theoretical research and exploration and practice, but due to the differences of specific regions in different regions, The construction and development of the local governments in the eastern, western and western regions present an awkward situation of imbalance, and there are still some deficiencies and defects. Based on this, this paper argues that how to continuously strengthen the implementation of public policies and speed. How to evaluate the performance of local government policy implementation, How to continuously improve the framework system of public policy performance evaluation of local government has become a topic that scholars and local governments pay more and more attention to. This paper takes the performance evaluation of public policy implementation of local government as the research object. Taking the analysis of problems and solving problems as the main research path, this paper mainly discusses the crux and countermeasures of the performance evaluation of the public policy implementation of local governments in China. This paper mainly includes five parts: the first part is mainly aimed at the background of this topic, theoretical value and practical significance, domestic and foreign research and practice status, The research methods and possible innovation points are elaborated in detail. The second part is mainly based on the existing books, papers, newspapers and other literature and other relevant content, in view of the local government public policy performance evaluation related concepts, the main characteristics. Logical process, The third part mainly discusses and analyzes the current situation and main problems of the performance evaluation practice of local government public policy implementation in China. Some local governments in some provinces and cities in the implementation of public policy performance evaluation measures and normative documents. The main problems include: public policy performance evaluation of the cognitive dilemma of the main body, The participation of residents and social organizations in the area is not strong, and there is a lack of a scientific and unified evaluation index system. The evaluation methods and means still need to be optimized, and the application value of the evaluation results is not obvious. These practical problems seriously restrict the stability of local government public policy implementation performance evaluation process and the credibility of the evaluation results. The fourth part is mainly based on the existing main problems to put forward some more targeted countermeasures and suggestions. It includes: to promote the value cognition of the local government public policy implementation performance appraisal personnel, to strengthen the local government public policy implementation performance appraisal external participation enthusiasm, Continuously improve the index system of local government public policy implementation performance evaluation, improve the methods and means of local government public policy implementation performance evaluation, and continuously strengthen the application value of the local government public policy implementation performance evaluation results. It is hoped that it can provide some references for the theoretical research and practical operation of the performance evaluation of the public policy implementation of local governments. The fifth part aims at the main points of this paper, the difficulties encountered in the process of the research. The prospect of future research and the direction of future research are briefly summarized.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D63

【相似文献】