中国非正式政治的研究:视角与争鸣

发布时间：2018-04-02 17:46

本文选题：非正式政治　切入点：制度视角　出处：《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：非正式政治理论是分析东亚国家尤其是中国政治的一个非常有用的分析框架。围绕"非正式政治的形成原因"这一议题,学术界形成了三种不同的分析视角:制度视角、文化视角、制度和文化双重视角。三者对非正式政治的形成原因、基本功能、发展方向有不同的看法。制度视角认为正式制度不发达导致非正式政治的产生,由此认为非正式政治是麻烦和问题的制造者,其发展方向是被正式政治替代。文化视角认为文化基因是非正式政治产生的根源,并认为非正式政治破坏正式政治的统一性和有效性。与前两者不同,制度和文化的双重视角认为任何制度环境和文化背景都存在非正式政治,非正式政治可能破坏正式政治,也可以补充正式政治的不足,其发展方向是逐步理性化。
[Abstract]:Informal political theory is a very useful framework for analyzing East Asian countries, especially Chinese politics.Around the topic of "the causes of the formation of informal politics", the academic circles have formed three different perspectives of analysis: institutional perspective, cultural perspective, institutional perspective and cultural perspective.They have different views on the formation reason, basic function and development direction of informal politics.From the perspective of institution, the author thinks that formal system underdevelopment leads to the emergence of informal politics, so informal politics is the cause of trouble and problem, and its development direction is to be replaced by formal politics.Cultural perspective holds that cultural genes are the root of informal politics, and that informal politics undermines the unity and effectiveness of formal politics.Different from the former two, the dual perspective of institution and culture holds that informal politics exists in any institutional environment and cultural background, and informal politics may destroy formal politics, and can also supplement the shortcomings of formal politics.Its development direction is gradually rational.
【作者单位】：中山大学中国公共管理研究中心;中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金专项项目“党中央治国理政的政治思想研究”(16ZZD022) 2016年度广州市社科规划课题(2016GZYB30)
【分类号】：C912.3;D630

【参考文献】