论我国社会组织准入和退出机制的困境与改革思路

发布时间：2018-04-06 01:35

本文选题：社会组织　切入点：准入机制　出处：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着社会组织数量的增加及其地位、作用的提升,对社会组织的培育监管也愈显重要。社会组织准入和退出机制是整个社会组织规范监管机制的核心,二者决定了社会组织进入社会生活、参与社会生活和退出社会生活的渠道是否顺畅,折射了社会组织的生存发展环境,体现了国家对于社会组织的治理理念。从法律层面,由于我国现行的有关行政法规效力层级较低,规定缺位滞后,与其他部门法律之间衔接不当等原因,造成了准入和退出机制的多种现实困境。本文基于这些现状,侧重从登记管理机关实务视角,剖析社会组织准入机制和退出机制的困境,并提出有关改革思路。第一章介绍了社会组织的概念,着重介绍我国社会组织概念的发展演变,社会组织的特点、类型及外延,点明了我国依法注册登记的社会组织仅包括组织成员、资金来源、决策运行均独立于党政体系之外的社会团体、民办非企业单位和基金会。第二章探讨了我国现行社会组织准入机制和退出机制的内涵、产生背景和现实困境,指出了由于社会组织立法的效力层级低下,立法内容滞后,社会组织准入和退出制度设计上的缺位,及相关法律之间的衔接不当等,导致登记监管实务中常常陷入难以操作的困境。第三章具体比较分析了英美法系的美国、英国和大陆法系的德国、日本等国家社会组织准入和退出方式的基本内涵、特点,总结分析了上述四国为社会组织的生存和发展提供了较为宽松的法律环境,强调意思自治原则、尊重公民结社自由权的理念,以及对我国社会组织准入和退出制度改革的启示。第四章从我国社会组织发展的客观实际,结合我国的政治法律体制和登记管理机关实务,分别探讨了宏观层面的社会组织治理理念、社会组织立法模式,微观层面的准入、退出方式的改革思路和措施。
[Abstract]:With the increase of the number of social organizations, their status and role, the cultivation and supervision of social organizations become more and more important.The entry and withdrawal mechanism of social organizations is the core of the regulatory mechanism of the whole social organization, which determines whether the channels for social organizations to enter social life, participate in social life and withdraw from social life are smooth.It reflects the survival and development environment of social organizations and reflects the concept of governance of social organizations.From the legal level, due to the low level of effectiveness of the relevant administrative laws and regulations in China, the lack of provisions, and the improper connection between the laws of other departments and other departments, there are many practical difficulties in the mechanism of access and withdrawal.Based on the present situation, this paper focuses on analyzing the dilemma of the admission mechanism and exit mechanism of social organizations from the perspective of the practice of registration and management organs, and puts forward the relevant reform ideas.The first chapter introduces the concept of social organization, focusing on the development and evolution of the concept of social organization in China, the characteristics, types and extension of social organization, and points out that the social organization registered according to law in our country only includes the members of the organization and the source of funds.Decision-making operations are independent of the party-government system outside the social organizations, private-run non-enterprise units and foundations.The second chapter discusses the connotation of the current access mechanism and exit mechanism of social organization in China, and points out that the content of legislation lags behind due to the low level of effectiveness of the legislation of social organization.The absence of the design of the entry and withdrawal system of social organizations, and the improper connection between the relevant laws, often lead to difficult to operate in the practice of registration supervision.The third chapter compares and analyzes the basic connotation and characteristics of the access and withdrawal of social organizations in the United States, the United Kingdom and the continental law countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom and the countries of the continental law system, such as Japan and the United States.This paper summarizes and analyzes the four countries above, which provide a loose legal environment for the survival and development of social organizations, emphasize the principle of autonomy of will, respect the concept of citizens' right to freedom of association, and give enlightenment to the reform of the entry and withdrawal system of social organizations in China.The fourth chapter discusses the concept of social organization governance, the legislative model of social organization, and the entry of micro level from the objective reality of the development of social organization in our country, combined with the political legal system and the practice of registration management organ in our country.The reform thought and measure of exit mode.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D632.9

【相似文献】