精细化视角下省域社会治理绩效的组合评价——基于29个省域的实证研究

发布时间：2018-04-14 13:25

本文选题：精细化 + 社会治理　；参考：《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：社会治理精细化是衡量社会治理绩效的重要标准,其价值取向是人的精准管理与服务,手段是精细化治理。基于价值取向衍生下的精准维系秩序,精准保障权利和精准改善民生三大目标的实现逻辑,通过指标的初步设计、经验性筛选和鉴别力筛选,可构建包括社会保障治理、社会安全治理、公共服务治理和社会参与治理四个一级指数在内的社会治理绩效评价指标体系,并以全国29个省域为样本,基于TOPSIS、GRA和PCA三种单一评价方法的结果,运用均值法、Borda法、Copeland法、模糊Borda法四种方法进行组合评价,据此划分为三个区域等级。研究结果显示,2014年我国社会治理绩效整体水平较低,且省际间差异明显,东中西三大区域呈现出"东部较高,西部次之,中部较低"的特征,因此,应大力推进区域发展战略、重塑精细化治理思维、科学把握社会治理绩效特征、精确划分区域等级,推动社会治理精细化转型,全面提升社会治理绩效水平。
[Abstract]:Social governance refinement is an important standard to measure the performance of social governance, its value orientation is the precise management and service of human beings, and the means is fine governance.Based on the realization logic of precise maintenance order, accurate protection of rights and accurate improvement of people's livelihood derived from value orientation, through the preliminary design of indicators, empirical screening and discriminant screening, we can construct social security governance.Social security governance, public service governance and social participation governance are four primary indexes of social governance performance evaluation index system, and taking 29 provinces as samples, based on the results of three single evaluation methods, TopSISGRA and PCA.This paper uses the mean value method and the fuzzy Borda method to carry on the combined evaluation, and divides it into three regional grades.The results show that the overall level of social governance performance in China in 2014 is low, and the differences between provinces are obvious. The three regions of East and West have the characteristics of "the east is higher, the west is the second, and the middle is lower". Therefore, the regional development strategy should be vigorously promoted.Remoulding the thinking of fine governance, scientifically grasping the characteristics of social governance performance, accurately dividing the regional level, promoting the fine transformation of social governance, and improving the level of social governance performance in an all-round way.
【作者单位】：中国矿业大学(北京)文法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“新型城镇化背景下的社会治理转型升级研究”(13&ZD039)基金资助
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】