安徽

发布时间：2018-05-12 03:21

本文选题：县域经济 + 省直管县　；参考：《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】："郡县治,天下安"。县域经济社会的发展和进步,是统筹城乡发展、加快城乡一体化进程的根本保障,也是未来全面建成小康社会的重要体现,更是确保基层繁荣稳定、维护国家长治久安的基本要求。我国幅员辽阔,地区发展不平衡的问题依然较为严峻,尤其是广大县级地区,经济社会的发展远没有达到应有的水平,未来有着广阔的发展前景和强烈的发展诉求。但是在以往的体制下,县域经济社会的发展受到诸多限制和约束,发展乏力。县级政府由于权力有限,缺乏必要的经济社会管理权限以及与之相匹配的资源配置能力,自身的发展动力和发展积极性都严重不足。而长期以来的"市管县"体制,在促进地级市发展的同时,也逐渐成了制约县域经济社会发展的不利因素,市域范围内的各种利益和资源不断地向地级市倾斜,以满足地级市的优先发展需求,导致县域经济社会的发展受到极大影响,不少地方甚至出现了"市刮县"和"市吃县"的现象。针对这些情况,亟需进行管理体制的改革,以彻底改变县域经济社会发展的不利局面。因此,国家从2005年开始着手在全国范围内逐步推广"省直管县"的系列改革,以打破对于县域经济社会发展的束缚,为县域经济的发展打造良好的内外部环境。可以说,"省直管县"体制改革已经成为我国地方政府改革中的一项重要内容。安徽省作为改革的积极倡导者,经过多年的探索和实践,从2004年开始的财政管理体制改革到2006年的"扩权强县"改革,再到2011年设立省直管试点县,在"省直管县"体制改革方面做出了大量的工作,也取得了较为突出的成就。当然,我们也应看到,作为改革的先试先行者,安徽省的"省直管县"体制改革工作,在取得成就的同时,也不可避免的存在一些问题,比如配套机制不完善、工作关系没有完全理顺、府际竞争加剧等,一定程度上制约了改革效力的进一步发挥,需要在后续的改革过程中予以有针对性的解决。总的来说,安徽省的"省直管县"体制改革工作,立足自身,循序渐进,有其自身的特殊性,同时也具有一定的代表性,有很强的研究意义和研究价值。本文以安徽省的"省直管县"体制改革工作为主题,以安徽省"省直管县"体制改革的发展过程为研究对象,并着重分析宿松和广德两个省直管试点县的情况。通过文献研究、实地调研、人物访谈等多种形式,全方位了解和探索安徽"省直管县"改革的情况,总结经验、找出不足,同时结合国内其他省份的改革实践情况,加以对比分析,对于安徽省在改革过程存在的问题以及未来的发展,提出有针对性的对策和建议。
[Abstract]:The whole world is safe. The development and progress of the county economy and society is the fundamental guarantee for the overall development of urban and rural areas and the acceleration of the process of urban-rural integration. It is also an important embodiment of building a well-off society in an all-round way in the future, and it also ensures the prosperity and stability of the grassroots. The basic requirements for safeguarding the country's long-term stability and stability. China has a vast territory and uneven regional development, especially in county-level areas, the economic and social development is far from the level it should be, and there are broad prospects and strong demands for development in the future. But in the past system, the development of county economy and society is limited and restricted. Because of the limited power, lack of necessary economic and social management authority and the matching ability of resources allocation, the county government has a serious shortage of its own development power and enthusiasm. While promoting the development of prefecture-level cities, the long-term system of "managing cities and counties" has gradually become an unfavorable factor restricting the economic and social development of counties. The interests and resources in the scope of the cities are constantly tilting towards the cities at the prefectural level. In order to meet the priority development needs of prefecture-level cities, the development of county economy and society has been greatly affected, and many places have even appeared the phenomenon of "city scraping county" and "city eating county". In view of these conditions, it is urgent to reform the management system in order to completely change the unfavorable situation of county economic and social development. Therefore, from 2005, the country began to gradually popularize the series of reforms of "managing the counties directly by the province" in the whole country, in order to break the shackles of the development of the county economy and society, and to create a good internal and external environment for the development of the county economy. It can be said that the system reform of "managing county directly by province" has become an important content in the reform of local government. Anhui Province as an active advocate of reform, after many years of exploration and practice, from the financial management system reform began in 2004 to "expand the power of strong counties" reform in 2006, and then to establish the provincial direct management of the pilot counties in 2011, A great deal of work has been done in the system reform of "managing county directly by province", and more outstanding achievements have been made. Of course, we should also see that, as a pioneer in reform, the reform of the "province directly in charge of counties" system in Anhui Province has made achievements, but at the same time, it is inevitable that there are some problems, such as the imperfect supporting mechanism. The work relationship has not been completely straightened out and the inter-government competition has intensified to a certain extent which restricts the further development of the reform effect and needs to be resolved in the course of the subsequent reform. In general, the reform work of "managing county directly by province" in Anhui Province has its own particularity and representativeness, which has strong research significance and research value. This paper focuses on the reform of the system of "managing county directly by province" in Anhui Province, and takes the development process of system reform of "managing county directly by province" in Anhui Province as the research object, and analyses emphatically the situation of Su-song County and Guangde County directly in charge of the pilot county. Through literature research, field investigation, personage interviews and other forms, we can comprehensively understand and explore the situation of the reform of "directly administered counties" in Anhui Province, sum up experience, find out the shortcomings, and combine with the practice of reform in other provinces in the country at the same time. By comparing and analyzing the problems existing in the reform process and the future development of Anhui Province, some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】