我国城市治理精细化的困境与迷思

发布时间：2018-05-20 18:30

  本文选题：城市治理 + 精细化　； 参考：《探索与争鸣》2017年09期

【摘要】：作为一种新型的治理范式,精细化治理是对传统粗放式、经验化治理模式的反思、批判和超越,代表着城市治理现代化的基本方向,是未来我国城市治理和发展的主导性策略。从国家治理的历史情境和发展脉络看,我国一直缺乏"数目字管理"的传统,粗放式治理的行政文化使得城市精细化治理先天发育不足。从现实的生态环境分析,城市精细化治理所需要的信息技术、财政资金和人力资本支撑均相当匮乏,城市基层社会"强行政弱治理"的格局严重制约了精细化治理所能达到的水平和境界。更为重要的是,城市精细化治理对于秩序和确定性的偏爱与渴求,以及对于数据治国和指标治理的迷信,使城市治理容易陷入秩序唯美主义、数据崇拜和技术决定论的迷思,其中蕴含着独特的内生性风险。构建以人为中心、极具包容性且富有弹性的城市治理模式,需要由市民和社区决定城市治理的发展方向。
[Abstract]:As a new governance paradigm, fine governance is the reflection, criticism and transcendence of the traditional extensive and empirical governance model, which represents the basic direction of the modernization of urban governance, and is the leading strategy for the future urban governance and development in China. From the historical situation and development context of national governance, our country has been lack of the tradition of "number character management", and the extensive administrative culture of governance makes the urban fine governance congenital lack of development. From the reality of the ecological environment analysis, the information technology, financial capital and human capital support for the fine urban governance are quite scarce. The pattern of "strong administration and weak governance" in urban grassroots society has seriously restricted the level and level of fine governance. More importantly, the preference and desire for order and certainty in urban fine governance, as well as superstition in data governance and index governance, make urban governance easy to fall into the myth of order aestheticism, data worship and technological determinism. It contains unique endogenous risks. It is necessary for citizens and communities to decide the development direction of urban governance in order to build a human-centered, inclusive and flexible urban governance model.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学政治与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国国家治理现代化的战略愿景与路径优化研究”(14AZD009)
【分类号】：D630
，

本文编号：1915764