政府信息公开诉讼中内部文件的审查研究

发布时间：2018-05-23 14:04

本文选题：内部文件 + 内部管理信息　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：政府信息公开对保护知情权、促进民主政治、推进行政工作透明度、防止腐败等具有深远的意义。《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》(文中简称《条例》)颁布以后,我国的政府信息公开工作取得了长足的进步,但也存在很多问题,尤其是行政机关常常以“内部文件”为挡箭牌拒绝公开某些政府信息。所以本文试图从申请内部文件公开的诉讼案例出发,结合法律法规和司法实践,厘清内部文件公开与不公开的边界,并为审查内部文件是否可以公开及公开的范围提供思路。本文大致分为4个部分,第一部分引言首先对政府信息公开制度的内容、主要原则、意义进行了简要介绍,并引出本文的研究主题——内部文件的审查研究。其次对相关的研究现状进行了综述与回顾,并对本文的写作思路、方法和意义进行了概括。第二部分收集了3个申请内部文件公开的经典诉讼案例:《卫某某与上海市浦东新区人民政府信息公开纠纷案》、《吴某某等诉杭州市人民政府不履行信息公开法定职责案》、《姚某某、刘某某等诉福建省永泰县国土资源局案》。从这3个案例中,笔者归纳出内部文件是否属于政府信息、内部文件是否属于政府信息公开的例外事项、如何界定内部文件可以公开的范围这三个焦点问题,并总结了法院的审判逻辑。第三部分,对案例的争议点进行了具体分析。首先,通过对内部文件的内涵分析,将内部文件类型化为内部管理信息、过程性信息和其他内部信息,从信息公开的主体、本质属性、产生方式和形式要件这4方面展开分析,论证得出内部文件应属于广义的政府信息。其次,位阶较低的法规明确规定了内部管理信息和过程性信息一般不应被公开。在司法实践中,内部管理信息常因无法律约束力、与公众利益无关、公开可能妨碍行政职能的发挥而不予公开,过程性信息常因保障行政机关内部自由交流和维护社会稳定而不予公开,论证得出应把内部文件视为信息公开的例外事项。但内部文件并不是绝对不能公开的例外事项,需要结合不同的情况具体分析。所以,在第三部分的最后,笔者将内部文件划分成内部管理信息、过程性信息、主观性信息、客观性信息这4种类型,并从这4方面对其可以公开的范围进行了探索。第四部分,在第二、三部分的论证基础上,提出审查内部文件公开与不公开应遵循的原则和应把握的具体方法。审查内部文件公开与不公开应遵循利益平衡和可分割性的原则。并从内部文件是否存在、是否属于政府信息、是否属于可以公开的内部管理信息范围、是否属于可以公开的过程性信息范围、是否间接属于“秘密条款”限制的情形、是否属于“工作秘密”、“三安全一稳定”限制的情形这6方面具体展开审查内部文件公开与不公开的具体方法。
[Abstract]:The disclosure of government information is of far-reaching significance in protecting the right to know, promoting democratic politics, promoting the transparency of administrative work, preventing corruption, etc. After the promulgation of the regulations of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "regulations"), China's government information disclosure has made great progress, but there are also many problems, especially the administrative organs often use "internal documents" as a pretext to refuse to disclose some government information. Therefore, this paper tries to clarify the boundary between internal document disclosure and non-disclosure, and provide ideas for examining whether internal documents can be open and the scope of disclosure, starting from the litigation cases of applying for internal document disclosure, combining with laws, regulations and judicial practice. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the contents, main principles and significance of the government information disclosure system. Secondly, this paper summarizes and reviews the current research situation, and summarizes the ideas, methods and significance of this paper. The second part collects three classic litigation cases in which internal documents are made public: the dispute between Wei and the Pudong New District people's Government in Shanghai, the case of Wu and so on v. the Hangzhou Municipal people's Government for failing to perform its statutory duties of Information publicity, and the < Yao, so, and so on. Liu so and so on v. Fujian Yongtai County Land and Resources Bureau case. From these three cases, the author concludes whether internal documents belong to government information, whether internal documents are exceptions to the disclosure of government information, and how to define the scope within which internal documents can be made public. And summarized the trial logic of the court. The third part, has carried on the concrete analysis to the case dispute point. First of all, by analyzing the connotation of internal documents, the internal documents are classified into internal management information, process information and other internal information, which are analyzed from four aspects: the subject of information disclosure, the essential attribute, the way of producing and the formal elements. The conclusion is that internal documents should belong to the broad sense of government information. Second, lower-ranking regulations make it clear that internal management information and process information should not generally be made public. In judicial practice, internal management information is often closed because it is not legally binding and has nothing to do with the public interest. Process information is often not disclosed because of ensuring free communication within administrative organs and maintaining social stability. It is demonstrated that internal documents should be regarded as an exception to the disclosure of information. But internal documents are not an exception that can never be made public, and need to be analyzed in the light of different circumstances. At the end of the third part, the author divides the internal document into four types: internal management information, process information, subjective information and objective information. The fourth part, on the basis of argumentation in the second and third parts, puts forward the principles to be followed and the concrete methods to be grasped in reviewing the disclosure and non-disclosure of internal documents. Review of internal document disclosure and non-disclosure shall follow the principle of balance of interests and separability. And from the existence of internal documents, whether they belong to government information, whether they belong to the scope of internal management information that can be made public, whether they belong to the scope of procedural information that can be made public, and whether they are indirectly restricted by "secret clauses", Whether it is classified as "work secret", "three safety, one stability" restriction situation these six aspects of the specific review of internal documents open and closed specific methods.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D63

【相似文献】