区镇联动视角下的顺德简政强镇改革研究

发布时间：2018-05-29 10:06

本文选题：简政强镇 + 职责异构　；参考：《华南理工大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：2009年以来,顺德简政强镇改革达到了新的历史高度,引起了众多专家学者及政府官员的广泛关注,并以此为序幕拉开了新一轮的简政强镇改革。此轮改革的着力点仍然是机构改革,涉及到了机构的调整、职能的整合及上下级权力的优化,牵扯到了省市区三级的利益分配和区镇之间的矛盾协调,其影响极其深远。从改革的方式来看,机构调整的大方向是推行大部门体制,将职能相近或相同的部门及机构合并,但在改革的过程中又进行了动态的调整,如拆分或新组建部门;职能的整合主要立足于区镇之间的关系,内外兼修,既有内部职能的整合,也有外部上下级之间、同级部门之间职能的划分;而权力的优化则是区镇之间的权力划分,既要满足区宏观调控的职能,又不能限制镇的发展。本研究站在区一级政府的维度,以区镇之间的联动为核心,试图通过研究顺德简政强镇改革的举措及内外因素,挖掘制约其改革发展的原因。由外及内地分析其改革的困境,既受到了外部权力下放的制约,又有内部利益的争夺;既有体制性的问题,也有自身发展不足的影响,归根结底还是职责同构下的体制惯性及其政府运作机制障碍引发的内外矛盾难以调和。笔者针对改革的困境,结合国外的政府治理理念,引入职责异构的理论视角。引进职责异构并不是为了否定职责同构,而是着眼于改革的实际,多角度多层面的考虑改革的步骤,理顺各级政府的职责,优化纵向政府间的关系,尽可能将区镇的职能差异化,合理配置区镇职能;然后从机构改革入手,推进政府纵向结构的演变,从结构上改变上下级职能交错、重复管理的困境,进一步强化镇一级的管理能力;进而对上下级权力进行合理调配,使区与镇不再是简单的上下级关系,根据内部事务管理的需要调配两者权力的大小,为进一步改革谋求新的改革思路及对策。
[Abstract]:Since 2009, the reform of Shunde Jianzheng town has reached a new historical height, which has aroused the widespread concern of many experts and government officials, and it has opened a new round of the reform of simple government and strong town as the prelude. The focus of this round of reform is still institutional reform, which involves the adjustment of the organization, the integration of functions and the optimization of the power between the upper and lower levels, and involves the distribution of interests at the three levels of the province, city and city, and the contradiction and coordination between the districts and towns, which has a far-reaching impact. From the way of reform, the main direction of institutional adjustment is to carry out the system of large departments and merge the departments and institutions with similar functions or the same functions, but in the process of reform, dynamic adjustment has been carried out, such as split or newly formed departments; The integration of functions is mainly based on the relationship between the districts and towns, and the internal and external revision, including the integration of the internal functions, the division of functions between the external upper and lower levels and the departments at the same level, while the optimization of the power is the division of the power between the districts and towns. Must satisfy the district macro-control function, but also cannot limit the town's development. This research stands in the dimension of district level government, taking the linkage between districts and towns as the core, attempts to explore the reasons of restricting its reform and development by studying the measures and internal and external factors of the reform in Shunde. The analysis of the plight of its reform from the outside and the interior is not only restricted by the external decentralization of power, but also contested by its internal interests. There are institutional problems as well as the influence of its own underdevelopment. In the final analysis, it is difficult to reconcile the internal and external contradictions caused by the institutional inertia under the isomorphic structure and the obstacles of the government operation mechanism. In view of the dilemma of reform and the concept of government governance abroad, the author introduces the theory of heterogeneous responsibilities. The purpose of introducing heterogeneous responsibilities is not to negate the isomorphism of duties, but to focus on the reality of reform, to consider the steps of reform from many angles and levels, to rationalize the responsibilities of governments at all levels, and to optimize the relationship between vertical governments. As far as possible, the functions of the district and town should be differentiated, and the functions of the district and town should be rationally allocated. Further strengthen the management ability at the township level, and then rationally allocate the power between the upper and lower levels, so that the district and the town are no longer a simple relationship between the upper and lower levels, and allocate their powers according to the needs of internal affairs management, To seek new reform ideas and countermeasures for further reform.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】