当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 行政管理论文 >

河北省省直管县体制改革问题研究

发布时间:2018-06-08 04:24

  本文选题:行政改革 + 行政层级 ; 参考:《河北师范大学》2016年硕士论文


【摘要】:党的十八从八个方面提出了改革现有行政体制的战略部署,行政层级改革位列其中,这是保证行政权力顺利运转的必要条件。要优化行政层级,除了要优化行政区划设置,还要继续在具备条件的地方试行省直管县体制。推行省直管县体制改革,有助于减少行政层级、提高行政效率、壮大县域经济、推进城乡统筹发展,目前,全国已有20多个省份在试验省直管县体制改革。纵观学术界对省直管县体制改革的研究,首先需要解决的就是概念混淆问题。在各省探索省直管县体制改革实践中,为保证稳步推进,结合自身实际,进行了“财政省直管”、“强县扩权”、“扩权强县”的有益探索,可以说这些探索为省直管县体制改革奠定了基础。浙江省和海南省是推行省直管县体制比较成功的省份。这二省的长期实践,为其他省份开展改革提供了很多经验,但也不得不面临一些由于管理幅度增大省级政府治理难度增大、责任与权力不对等、与现行体制不配套等共性问题。河北省的省直管县体制改革有其特殊之处。2013年5月,省委省政府确定定州、辛集为河北省首批省直管县体制改革试点,赋予定州、辛集省辖市级经济社会管理权限。2015年4月,省委省政府决定扩大试点范围,新增迁安、宁晋、涿州、怀来、平泉、任丘、景县、魏县为扩大省直管县体制改革试点县。按照扩大试点的总体部署要求,2015年4月1日试点县按新体制入轨试运行,10月1日实现正式运行。遗憾的是,在试运行半年后,河北省委省政府做出重新调整,新增的8个县不再开展试点工作,重新划归所在地级市管理。河北省在省直管县体制改革探索中,探索出了结合本省实际的改革模式、壮大了县域经济、提高了行政效率、优化生产力布局、推进城镇化进程、推动了城乡统筹发展,取得了一定的成绩。但也存在一些问题,除了全国省直管县体制改革普遍存在的共性问题外,还表现在欠缺长远规划、支持力度不大、市县配合不到位等方面。究其原因,既有省级政府财政实力和管理能力存在不足、政策不配套,又不能忽略市级阻力、县级主动作为能力欠缺的客观事实。立足河北省省情,结合京津冀协同发展的宝贵机遇,河北省的省直管县体制改革应该坚持持续适时推进,同时应该继续支持地级市的发展,调整行政区划,确立“省直管县+大都市区”为特征的行政区划改革目标。具体到省直管县的发展上,既要加大对其的支持力度,包括县域经济提质增效、鼓励万众创新、支持新型城镇化建设、支持土地指标等要素的保障、省直管县体制改革等,还要完善综合配套措施,包括鼓励和支持垂直管理部门支持省直管县体制改革、完善体制改革和畅通干部选拔任用等。
[Abstract]:The eighteen aspects of the Party put forward the strategic plan of reforming the existing administrative system, among which the reform of administrative hierarchy is the necessary condition to ensure the smooth operation of administrative power. In order to optimize the administrative hierarchy, we should continue to try out the provincial and county system where the conditions are available, in addition to optimizing the setting of administrative divisions. The implementation of the system reform of managing counties directly in provinces will help to reduce administrative levels, improve administrative efficiency, strengthen county economies, and promote the overall development of urban and rural areas. At present, more than 20 provinces in the country have been directly managing the system reform of counties in experimental provinces. Throughout the academic research on the reform of the county system, the first thing to be solved is conceptual confusion. In order to ensure steady progress in the practice of the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of the counties, and in combination with their own reality, the provinces have carried out beneficial explorations of "direct administration of the financial province", "strengthening county power", and "expanding the power and strengthening the county power". It can be said that these explorations have laid the foundation for the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of counties. Zhejiang Province and Hainan Province are more successful provinces in the implementation of provincial direct control of the county system. The long-term practice of these two provinces has provided a lot of experience for other provinces to carry out the reform, but they also have to face some common problems such as increasing the management range, increasing the difficulty of provincial government governance, unequal responsibility and power, and not matching with the current system. In May 2013, the provincial party committee and the provincial government decided on Dingzhou, and Xinji was the first batch of provincial directly administered county system reform pilot in Hebei Province, giving Dingzhou and Xinji municipal economic and social management authority. The provincial party committee and provincial government decided to expand the scope of the pilot, adding Qian'an, Ningjin, Zhuozhou, Huailai, Pingquan, Renqiu, Jingxian and Wei counties to expand the pilot counties in charge of county system reform. According to the overall deployment requirements of the expanded pilot, the pilot counties were put into trial operation according to the new system on April 1, 2015, and officially put into operation on October 1. Unfortunately, after six months of trial operation, the Hebei provincial government made a readjustment, the new eight counties no longer carry out pilot work, re-classified to the prefecture-level city management. In the exploration of the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of counties, Hebei Province has explored a reform model that combines the actual situation of the province, which has strengthened the county economy, improved administrative efficiency, optimized the distribution of productive forces, advanced the process of urbanization, and promoted the overall development of urban and rural areas. Some achievements have been made. However, there are also some problems. Besides the common problems in the system reform of the counties directly administered by the provinces, there are still some aspects such as the lack of long-term planning, the lack of support, the lack of coordination between cities and counties, and so on. The reasons are that the provincial government's financial strength and management ability are insufficient, the policy is not matched, and the city level resistance can not be ignored, and the county level initiative is the objective fact of the lack of capacity. Based on the situation in Hebei Province and the precious opportunities for the coordinated development between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of the counties in Hebei Province should be promoted continuously and timely, and at the same time, it should continue to support the development of prefecture-level cities and readjust the administrative divisions. To establish the reform goal of administrative division with the characteristics of "provincial administration of the county metropolitan area". With regard to the development of provinces directly in charge of counties, it is necessary to increase support for them, including increasing the quality and efficiency of county economies, encouraging masses to innovate, supporting the construction of new types of urbanization, supporting the protection of such elements as land indicators, and the system reform of provinces directly in charge of counties, and so on. It is also necessary to improve the comprehensive supporting measures, including encouraging and supporting vertical management departments to support the reform of the system of provinces and counties directly in charge of the county, improving the reform of the system and unblocking the selection and appointment of cadres, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D630

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 蔡立辉;;科学推进省直管县体制改革[J];农村经营管理;2009年03期

2 刘传贺;;省直管县体制改革原则探究[J];中共乐山市委党校学报;2010年01期

3 刘传贺;;省直管县体制改革困境探究[J];西安社会科学;2010年02期

4 孙卓睿;;浅析我国省直管县体制改革[J];东方企业文化;2011年10期

5 李东民;杨贺新;;推进省直管县体制改革试点的实践与思考[J];中国机构改革与管理;2012年03期

6 李东民;杨贺新;;推进省直管县体制改革试点的实践与思考[J];机构与行政;2012年07期

7 庞明礼;张东方;;省直管县体制改革的制度设计研究[J];北京行政学院学报;2013年01期

8 王克群;;省直管县体制改革建议[J];小城镇建设;2006年02期

9 薄贵利;;稳步推进省直管县体制[J];中国行政管理;2006年09期

10 徐元明;刘远;周春芳;;省直管县体制改革相关问题研究——以江苏省为例[J];江海学刊;2007年06期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 ;湖南省省直管县体制改革的建议方案[A];湖南省发展县域特色经济研讨会论文集[C];2009年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 记者 张建新;全省深化省直管县体制改革工作电视电话会议召开[N];河南日报;2013年

2 张锋 本报记者 许定华;威宁:吹响省直管县体制改革试点“结集号”[N];毕节日报;2013年

3 詹承豫 中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院副教授;以效果为导向,,让省直管县体制改革更有意义[N];中国社会报;2009年

4 记者 王利英;全省深化省直管县体制改革工作电视电话会议召开[N];鹤壁日报;2013年

5 马纯红 张治忠 湖南省社会科学院副研究员、中南林业科技大学讲师;推行省直管县改革要注意风险规避[N];中国改革报;2009年

6 河南省社会科学院 孟白;我国省直管县改革试点中出现的问题及对策研究[N];农民日报;2013年

7 记者 张建新;明年起,省直管县实行全面直管[N];河南日报;2013年

8 记者 王仲斌;河南进一步推进省直管县试点工作[N];中国县域经济报;2011年

9 早报记者 吴志刚;江苏“省直管县”10月起试点[N];东方早报;2012年

10 记者 刘军 通讯员 郑应平;地级中心城市功能不削弱不变异[N];湘潭日报;2009年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 张鼎良;我国省直管县体制改革研究[D];南京大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 刘圣辉;当代中国省直管县体制改革研究[D];陕西师范大学;2011年

2 陈远;论省直管县体制改革的现状、问题与对策[D];湖南师范大学;2010年

3 孙振山;省直管县体制改革问题研究[D];郑州大学;2011年

4 雷皓桦;市县行政区划改革路径分析[D];南昌大学;2015年

5 周云;省直管县体制中的市县关系研究[D];南昌大学;2015年

6 孙继忠;贵州省直管县体制改革研究[D];贵州财经大学;2015年

7 蒋维林;河南省省直管县体制改革问题与对策研究[D];河南大学;2015年

8 杨佳;省直管县体制下县级政府的监督与问责机制研究[D];湖南师范大学;2015年

9 张剑;省直管县体制改革背景下市县关系研究[D];广西师范大学;2015年

10 王慈;河北省省直管县体制改革问题研究[D];河北师范大学;2016年



本文编号:1994445

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/1994445.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b2f40***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com