超越“公民”抗议:从企业竞争的角度理解邻避事件

发布时间：2018-06-23 21:16

本文选题：邻避 + 抗议　；参考：《中国行政管理》2017年12期

【摘要】：出于规避同业竞争和负外部性的目的,本地企业也会积极介入到邻避事件中去。一方面,借助于企业领导的人大代表或政协委员身份,或者动员本地重要人物等政治资源,在人大、政协、公开听证和行政诉讼等政治场域对邻避项目实施体制内抵制;另一方面,在体制外政治场域,本地企业甚至会成为抗议主体,隐蔽动员本地公民采取行动来直接抗议邻避项目。基于上述事实,研究认为,邻避事件(如什邡事件和启东事件)并非简单意义上的公民环境抗议事件,而是本地企业为了保护自身市场利益而推动的针对引进项目的企业竞争行为。对于此类事件的应对,除却公民导向的信息公开工作外,还需要政府亲自,或借助行业协会的作用,从地方产业结构调整的高度来予以预防和处置。
[Abstract]:For the purpose of avoiding peer competition and negative externalities, local enterprises will actively intervene in neighboring events. On the one hand, with the help of the status of NPC deputies or CPPCC members led by enterprises, or the mobilization of political resources such as local important figures, boycotting the implementation system of neighboring projects in the political field such as the people's Congress, the CPPCC, public hearings and administrative litigation; On the other hand, in the political field outside the system, local enterprises will even become the main body of protest, secretly mobilize local citizens to take action to protest directly against neighboring projects. Based on the above facts, the study concluded that the neighboring events (such as the Shifang incident and the Qidong incident) are not simply civil environmental protests. It is the competitive behavior of local enterprises to protect their own market interests. To deal with this kind of incident, besides the work of citizen oriented information publicity, it is also necessary for the government to prevent and deal with it from the height of the adjustment of local industrial structure, either by the government itself or by virtue of the role of the trade association.
【作者单位】：山东大学政治学与公共管理学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第61批面上资助项目“社会治安综合治理体制的起源、演进与运作机制研究”(编号:2017M612241) 山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金资助“作为一种治理方式的维稳——基于1980年以来的中央维稳文件”(编号:2017GN002) 2016年度国家社科重大招标项目“中国基本公共服务供给侧改革与获得感提升研究”(编号:16ZDA080)
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】