德阳市招商引资部门工作绩效考核研究
发布时间：2018-07-13 16:59
【摘要】：政府工作部门绩效考核是针对政府内部管理一种十分有效的现代管理方法,不仅为找到部门管理中存在的问题提供了途径,还为部门提升管理水平、优化服务提供了指引。因此,绩效考核已经成为地方政府部门转变工作作风,提升服务质量的主要管理手段。但在由于我国一直没有对政府及其部门的绩效考核明确相关的法律与政策规定,很多的地方政府及其部门的绩效考核都还处于探索和摸索的阶段。本文通过对国内外政府部门绩效考核演变历史的基础研究,对政府部门绩效考核涵义和相关理论的分析以及类似政府部门工作绩效考核现状的分析启示,以德阳市招商引资部门工作绩效考核为蓝本,通过对比的手法详细阐述了自2001年以来,德阳市招商引资部门工作绩效考核体系的主要内容、考核主体、考核程以及结果应用四个方面。并通过举例分析,指出该考核体系存在的考核内容倚重经济指标、考核实施主体功能不全、考核程序重结果轻过程和考核结果只奖不罚四个方面的问题。同时,抓住问题产生的原因。即：目标任务同比正增长的压力、考核实施单位范围狭窄、过程考核机制不健全以及考核结果应用片面化。最后,结合政府部门绩效考核相关理论知识和我国其他地区类似部门绩效考核实践的启示,针对德阳市招商引资部门工作绩效考核的现状和不足之处,提出从把项目引进的产业类别以及项目质量纳入对到位资金量化经济指标、增加对当年新引进重大项目社会经济影响力的外部评价和规范投资项目到位资金认定范围三个方面来完善目标任务设定；从引入行业或产业的主管部门与原有考核实施主体搭配进行考核和增加落地项目受益民众外部评议两个方面来拓展考核主体范围；从实施台帐过程管理、建立绩效问责机制和考核申诉机制三个方面来改进考核的程序；从考核结果的反馈机制、主考部门的日常管理修正建议和考核结果奖惩并举三个方面提高绩效考核结果应用强度的对策建议。试图优化德阳市现有招商引资部门工作绩效考核体系,增强其可操作性,为其他类似部门的绩效考核工作提供一些思路。
[Abstract]:Performance appraisal of government departments is a very effective modern management method for internal management of government. It not only provides a way to find the problems existing in the management of departments, but also provides guidance for departments to improve their management level and optimize their services. Therefore, performance appraisal has become the main management means for local government to change their work style and improve service quality. However, due to the lack of clear laws and policies on the performance appraisal of the government and its departments, many local governments and their departments are still in the stage of exploration and exploration. Through the basic research on the evolution history of government performance appraisal at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the meaning and relevant theories of government performance appraisal and the analysis of the current situation of performance appraisal of similar government departments. In this paper, the main contents and the main body of the performance appraisal system of the investment departments in Deyang City since 2001 have been explained in detail by means of comparison with the work performance appraisal of the investment departments in Deyang City, which is based on the model of the performance appraisal of the departments of investment promotion and investment promotion in Deyang City. The evaluation procedure and the application of the results are four aspects. Through the analysis of examples, it is pointed out that there are four problems in the examination system: the content of the examination depends on the economic index, the main function of the evaluation implementation is not complete, the evaluation procedure emphasizes the result less than the process, and the examination result is only awarded without penalty. At the same time, grasp the causes of the problem. That is, the pressure of positive growth of target tasks, the narrow scope of the evaluation implementation units, the imperfect process assessment mechanism and the one-sided application of the assessment results. Finally, combined with the relevant theoretical knowledge of government performance appraisal and other similar departments in our country performance appraisal practice enlightenment, in view of the current situation and shortcomings of performance appraisal of investment departments in Deyang City. From the introduction of the project into the industry category and the quality of the project into the quantification of the economic indicators of funds in place, Increasing the external evaluation of the social and economic impact of the major new projects introduced in that year and standardizing the scope of identification of the funds in place of the investment projects to improve the setting of the objectives and tasks; To expand the scope of the assessment subject from two aspects: introducing the industry or the competent department of the industry and matching the original assessment and implementing main body and increasing the external comments of the beneficiary of the landing project, and from the implementation of the accounting process management, Establish performance accountability mechanism and appraisal appeal mechanism to improve the evaluation process; from the assessment results feedback mechanism, The suggestions to improve the application intensity of the performance appraisal results in three aspects: the suggestions of daily management revision and the rewards and punishments of the examination results of the examiners. This paper attempts to optimize the performance appraisal system of the existing departments of attracting investment in Deyang, enhance its operability, and provide some ideas for the performance appraisal of other similar departments.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630
本文编号：2120109
[Abstract]:Performance appraisal of government departments is a very effective modern management method for internal management of government. It not only provides a way to find the problems existing in the management of departments, but also provides guidance for departments to improve their management level and optimize their services. Therefore, performance appraisal has become the main management means for local government to change their work style and improve service quality. However, due to the lack of clear laws and policies on the performance appraisal of the government and its departments, many local governments and their departments are still in the stage of exploration and exploration. Through the basic research on the evolution history of government performance appraisal at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the meaning and relevant theories of government performance appraisal and the analysis of the current situation of performance appraisal of similar government departments. In this paper, the main contents and the main body of the performance appraisal system of the investment departments in Deyang City since 2001 have been explained in detail by means of comparison with the work performance appraisal of the investment departments in Deyang City, which is based on the model of the performance appraisal of the departments of investment promotion and investment promotion in Deyang City. The evaluation procedure and the application of the results are four aspects. Through the analysis of examples, it is pointed out that there are four problems in the examination system: the content of the examination depends on the economic index, the main function of the evaluation implementation is not complete, the evaluation procedure emphasizes the result less than the process, and the examination result is only awarded without penalty. At the same time, grasp the causes of the problem. That is, the pressure of positive growth of target tasks, the narrow scope of the evaluation implementation units, the imperfect process assessment mechanism and the one-sided application of the assessment results. Finally, combined with the relevant theoretical knowledge of government performance appraisal and other similar departments in our country performance appraisal practice enlightenment, in view of the current situation and shortcomings of performance appraisal of investment departments in Deyang City. From the introduction of the project into the industry category and the quality of the project into the quantification of the economic indicators of funds in place, Increasing the external evaluation of the social and economic impact of the major new projects introduced in that year and standardizing the scope of identification of the funds in place of the investment projects to improve the setting of the objectives and tasks; To expand the scope of the assessment subject from two aspects: introducing the industry or the competent department of the industry and matching the original assessment and implementing main body and increasing the external comments of the beneficiary of the landing project, and from the implementation of the accounting process management, Establish performance accountability mechanism and appraisal appeal mechanism to improve the evaluation process; from the assessment results feedback mechanism, The suggestions to improve the application intensity of the performance appraisal results in three aspects: the suggestions of daily management revision and the rewards and punishments of the examination results of the examiners. This paper attempts to optimize the performance appraisal system of the existing departments of attracting investment in Deyang, enhance its operability, and provide some ideas for the performance appraisal of other similar departments.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李金龙;马骏;;基于平衡计分卡的地方政府招商引资绩效评估体系的设计[J];统计与决策;2009年12期
2 付景涛;倪星;;论地方政府在绩效评估中的理性选择——以珠海市为例[J];岭南学刊;2009年02期
3 周志忍;;我国政府绩效管理研究的回顾与反思[J];公共行政评论;2009年01期
4 袁素平;;政绩考核标准改革刍议[J];安阳师范学院学报;2008年04期
5 尚虎平;;大国崛起的地方政府激励与效率之路——我国改革30年地方政府绩效评估厘清、反思与展望[J];经济体制改革;2008年03期
6 倪星;;反思中国政府绩效评估实践[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
7 柴茂;;地方政府绩效评估体系研究——基于科学发展观视角[J];成都行政学院学报;2008年02期
8 董梅生;;安徽省地方政府绩效评价体系构建与实证分析[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
9 陈初f;;国内外地方政府绩效管理比较研究[J];佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
10 尚虎平;;“绩效”晋升下我国地方政府非绩效行为诱因——一个博弈论的解释[J];财经研究;2007年12期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 郑鑫;大庆市政府招商引资全过程项目化管理研究[D];东北石油大学;2011年
2 唐琬;地方政府招商引资现状及问题研究[D];云南大学;2010年
3 杨茜;地方政府招商引资服务效能评价和提升研究[D];安徽大学;2010年
4 王丹丹;地方政府招商引资路径分析[D];天津师范大学;2010年
5 张宝明;地方政府招商引资问题与对策研究[D];郑州大学;2009年
，本文编号：2120109
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2120109.html
