当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 行政管理论文 >

“生态艺术”与“逃避艺术”:尹绍亭、斯科特关于刀耕火种的“对话”

发布时间:2018-07-17 03:58
【摘要】:尹绍亭和斯科特分别从生态、政治两个角度对刀耕火种展开调查研究。尹绍亭从基诺族的刀耕火种田野调查入手,致力于刀耕火种研究迄今20年有余。斯科特对刀耕火种的研究过程更为曲折:他一开始关注刀耕火种技术,后来把视线转向生态环境与政治的关联。二人视域重合时,却因视角不同而产生了不同解读:内容涉及刀耕火种的农业技术、山地特征、族群关系、农耕礼仪,以及刀耕火种消失的原因等。两人的解读既有重合又有差异,但两种视角重叠,更能展现出人类学的生物文化整体观(biocultural holism)及其创新张力。
[Abstract]:Yin Shaoting and Scott from the ecological and political perspectives of slash-and-burn research. Yin Shaoting has been devoted to the research of slash-and-burn cultivation for more than 20 years. Scott's research on slash-and-burn farming was even more tortuous: he first focused on slash-and-burn technology, then turned his attention to the ecological and political connection. When the two people have the same vision, they have different interpretations because of the different perspectives: the content involves the agricultural technology of slash-and-burn cultivation, the characteristics of mountain, the relationship between ethnic groups, agricultural etiquette, and the reasons for the disappearance of slash-and-burn cultivation and so on. The two people's interpretation is not only consistent but also different, but the two angles of view overlap, which can show the (biocultural holism) and its creative tension of anthropology's whole view of biology and culture.
【作者单位】: 上海大学社会学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目“学科重建以来的中国民族志实践与书写研究”(项目编号:14CSH074)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:C95

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 康凯;《飞来横福》[J];前线;1999年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 本报记者 包庆 杨楠 发自上海;普利斯科特:寻找高效、合理的养老模式[N];第一财经日报;2005年



本文编号:2128911

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2128911.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1d8ed***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com