我国行政问责公正性提升的研究
发布时间：2018-07-18 16:11
【摘要】：创建责任政府是我国目前民主政治发展的重要方向和目标,行政问责正是顺应建设责任政府的理念而产生的,实施行政问责有助于规范政府的行政权力、促进政治民主化、强化政府的责任意识。行政问责的深入推行,不仅可以提升政府的公信力,同时也是实现社会公平正义的有效途径。自2003年“非典”问责以来,问责观念的普及程度越来越广,问责力度逐渐深入和提升,我国的学者们对行政问责的研究不断深入,形成了较为丰富的研究成果和理论基础,各地方政府也纷纷出台了问责相关的规章制度。行政问责是通过对政府官员的行政行为失范进行惩戒以达到警示的目的,不论是追究政府官员的责任还是对其失范行为进行惩戒都要求公正。只有在公开、公正、合理的前提下,行政问责才能发挥其作用和功能,可以说行政问责的生命力就是公正性。本文选择以行政问责的公正性为研究对象来研究行政问责,遵循“提出问题--分析问题—提出假设—论证假设”的逻辑框架,对问责实践中公正性不足的现状进行分析,进而提出如何完善我国行政问责公正性的具体对策。论文的基本思路与总体结构,具体来说如下:绪论部分首先阐述了选题的背景、国内外研究现状以及选题的研究意义,指出现有的行政问责实践中存在着公正性不足的问题。第二章,我国行政问责公正性的现状和问题。这一章首先是结合现实中的问责案列对行政问责现状中公正性不足的问题进行了阐述,然后通过对行政问责公正性不足的分析,归纳了三方面的原因,问责相关要素不完善、问责信息公开的缺失、问责救济的不完善。第三章,我国行政问责公正性问题的设计。第一节,完善问责相关要素,包括问责主体、问责客体、问责事由的完善。第二节,从培养问责信息公开的意识、完善问责信息公开相关制度、构建问责信息公开的监督制度、完善和拓宽问责信息公开的渠道方面都行政问责的信息公开进行完善构建。第三节,从规范被问责官员的申诉和复出方面完善对被问责官员的救济,提升问责公正性。第四章至第六章,分别对第三章设计的提升行政问责公正性的三种方案进行理论论证。
[Abstract]:The establishment of responsible government is an important direction and goal of the development of democratic politics in our country at present. Administrative accountability is produced in conformity with the idea of building responsible government. The implementation of administrative accountability is helpful to standardize the administrative power of the government and promote the democratization of politics. Strengthen the government's sense of responsibility. The further implementation of administrative accountability can not only enhance the credibility of the government, but also an effective way to realize social fairness and justice. Since the "SARS" accountability in 2003, the concept of accountability has become more and more widespread, and the degree of accountability has been gradually deepened and promoted. The scholars in our country have been deepening the research on administrative accountability, forming a relatively rich research results and theoretical basis. Local governments have also introduced accountability related rules and regulations. Administrative accountability is to punish the administrative misconduct of government officials in order to achieve the purpose of warning. Whether it is to investigate the responsibility of government officials or to punish their misconduct, justice is required. Only in the open, fair and reasonable premise, the administrative accountability can play its role and function, it can be said that the vitality of administrative accountability is fairness. This paper chooses the fairness of administrative accountability as the research object to study administrative accountability, follows the logical framework of "asking questions-analyzing questions-putting forward hypothesis-demonstration hypotheses", and analyzes the current situation of the lack of fairness in the practice of accountability. And then put forward how to improve the fairness of administrative accountability in China. The basic ideas and the overall structure of the paper are as follows: the introduction part first describes the background of the topic, domestic and foreign research status and the significance of the topic, pointing out that the existing practice of administrative accountability there is a lack of fairness. The second chapter, our country administrative accountability justice present situation and the question. This chapter first expounds the problem of the lack of fairness in the current situation of administrative accountability, and then through the analysis of the lack of fairness of administrative accountability, summarizes the three reasons, the relevant elements of accountability are not perfect. The absence of accountability information and the imperfection of accountability relief. The third chapter is the design of the fairness of administrative accountability in our country. The first section, improve the relevant elements of accountability, including accountability subject, accountability object, the improvement of accountability reasons. The second section, from the cultivation of awareness of accountability information disclosure, improve the accountability information disclosure system, the construction of accountability information disclosure supervision system, improve and broaden the channels of accountability information disclosure of administrative accountability information disclosure. In the third section, we improve the relief to the accountable officials from the aspects of standardizing the complaints and comeback of the accountable officials, and enhance the fairness of accountability. The fourth to sixth chapters, respectively, the third chapter designed to promote the fairness of the three schemes of administrative accountability for theoretical argumentation.
【学位授予单位】：电子科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630.9
本文编号：2132444
[Abstract]:The establishment of responsible government is an important direction and goal of the development of democratic politics in our country at present. Administrative accountability is produced in conformity with the idea of building responsible government. The implementation of administrative accountability is helpful to standardize the administrative power of the government and promote the democratization of politics. Strengthen the government's sense of responsibility. The further implementation of administrative accountability can not only enhance the credibility of the government, but also an effective way to realize social fairness and justice. Since the "SARS" accountability in 2003, the concept of accountability has become more and more widespread, and the degree of accountability has been gradually deepened and promoted. The scholars in our country have been deepening the research on administrative accountability, forming a relatively rich research results and theoretical basis. Local governments have also introduced accountability related rules and regulations. Administrative accountability is to punish the administrative misconduct of government officials in order to achieve the purpose of warning. Whether it is to investigate the responsibility of government officials or to punish their misconduct, justice is required. Only in the open, fair and reasonable premise, the administrative accountability can play its role and function, it can be said that the vitality of administrative accountability is fairness. This paper chooses the fairness of administrative accountability as the research object to study administrative accountability, follows the logical framework of "asking questions-analyzing questions-putting forward hypothesis-demonstration hypotheses", and analyzes the current situation of the lack of fairness in the practice of accountability. And then put forward how to improve the fairness of administrative accountability in China. The basic ideas and the overall structure of the paper are as follows: the introduction part first describes the background of the topic, domestic and foreign research status and the significance of the topic, pointing out that the existing practice of administrative accountability there is a lack of fairness. The second chapter, our country administrative accountability justice present situation and the question. This chapter first expounds the problem of the lack of fairness in the current situation of administrative accountability, and then through the analysis of the lack of fairness of administrative accountability, summarizes the three reasons, the relevant elements of accountability are not perfect. The absence of accountability information and the imperfection of accountability relief. The third chapter is the design of the fairness of administrative accountability in our country. The first section, improve the relevant elements of accountability, including accountability subject, accountability object, the improvement of accountability reasons. The second section, from the cultivation of awareness of accountability information disclosure, improve the accountability information disclosure system, the construction of accountability information disclosure supervision system, improve and broaden the channels of accountability information disclosure of administrative accountability information disclosure. In the third section, we improve the relief to the accountable officials from the aspects of standardizing the complaints and comeback of the accountable officials, and enhance the fairness of accountability. The fourth to sixth chapters, respectively, the third chapter designed to promote the fairness of the three schemes of administrative accountability for theoretical argumentation.
【学位授予单位】：电子科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 宋小卫;略论我国公民的知情权[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1994年05期
，本文编号：2132444
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2132444.html
