动员模式与普通官员行为:以公共危机管理为例
发布时间：2018-07-20 14:04
【摘要】：官员积极履职是公共危机管理取得良好绩效的重要前提,受到治理模式这一基本制度框架的约束。本文借鉴常规式治理和运动式治理研究的分析思路,将政府公共危机管理职责分为日常管理和事件管理,以台风和食品安全管理为例,通过问卷调查数据对不同动员程度下普通官员履职行为进行分析。研究发现:(1)台风和食品安全管理中,官员事件管理履职程度都高于日常管理履职程度;(2)无论是日常管理还是事件管理,台风灾害管理中官员履职程度都整体高于食品安全管理中官员履职程度;(3)台风灾害日常管理和事件管理履职程度的差异小于食品安全日常管理和事件管理履职程度的差异。政府动员程度差异是官员履职程度这一系列差异背后的共同原因。根据交易成本理论,交易频率、后果破坏性和事务可预见性可能构成塑造政府动员程度的三个重要因素。
[Abstract]:It is an important prerequisite for public crisis management to achieve good performance for officials to carry out their duties actively, which is constrained by the basic institutional framework of governance model. Based on the analysis of conventional governance and sports governance, this paper divides the responsibility of government public crisis management into daily management and event management, taking typhoon and food safety management as examples. This paper analyzes the behavior of ordinary officials under different mobilization degree by questionnaire survey data. The results show that: (1) in typhoon and food safety management, the degree of official event management is higher than that of daily management; (2) whether it is daily management or event management, The degree of performing duties of officials in typhoon disaster management is higher than that in food safety management; (3) the difference between daily management and event management of typhoon disaster is less than that of daily food safety management and event management. The difference of government mobilization level is the common reason behind the series of differences. According to transaction cost theory, transaction frequency, consequence destructiveness and affairs predictability may constitute three important factors that shape the degree of government mobilization.
【作者单位】： 华侨大学政治与公共管理学院、政治发展与公共治理研究中心;华侨大学政治与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“公共危机管理中地方政府行为取向的动力机制研究”(编号:11CGL094)
【分类号】：D63
[Abstract]:It is an important prerequisite for public crisis management to achieve good performance for officials to carry out their duties actively, which is constrained by the basic institutional framework of governance model. Based on the analysis of conventional governance and sports governance, this paper divides the responsibility of government public crisis management into daily management and event management, taking typhoon and food safety management as examples. This paper analyzes the behavior of ordinary officials under different mobilization degree by questionnaire survey data. The results show that: (1) in typhoon and food safety management, the degree of official event management is higher than that of daily management; (2) whether it is daily management or event management, The degree of performing duties of officials in typhoon disaster management is higher than that in food safety management; (3) the difference between daily management and event management of typhoon disaster is less than that of daily food safety management and event management. The difference of government mobilization level is the common reason behind the series of differences. According to transaction cost theory, transaction frequency, consequence destructiveness and affairs predictability may constitute three important factors that shape the degree of government mobilization.
【作者单位】： 华侨大学政治与公共管理学院、政治发展与公共治理研究中心;华侨大学政治与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“公共危机管理中地方政府行为取向的动力机制研究”(编号:11CGL094)
【分类号】：D63
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郎佩娟;王传宏;;论我国政府突发公共事件管理机构[J];中国行政管理;2007年11期
2 魏文涛;李建平;;高校突发公共事件管理探析[J];科技创新导报;2009年17期
3 徐忠炎;张龙;;大学生危机事件的管理策略研究[J];学理论;2011年13期
4 李倩;;基于性别角度的突发公共事件管理初探[J];党政干部学刊;2012年12期
5 蒋明敏;;突发公共事件管理中政府信息公开的障碍及其消解[J];大连理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
6 汪云峰;白庆华;田欣;;城市突发公共事件管理的网格化:控制结构的功能障碍及其突破[J];情报杂志;2010年04期
7 翁诗环;龚建平;;公共事件管理预警系统的构建[J];求索;2007年05期
8 林凡磊;李君荣;;灾害经济学对我国突发公共事件管理的启示[J];商业时代;2010年22期
9 黄厚南;;对高校突发公共事件管理的思考[J];延边党校学报;2010年05期
10 李建森;杨晨霞;王强;;试论突发公共事件管理应对能力[J];陕西行政学院学报;2010年02期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 杨顺新;倪Qń，
本文编号：2133782
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2133782.html
