智库驱动社会治理创新研究
[Abstract]:The complexity of social governance innovation is in urgent need of the effective integration of social pluralistic forces. The frequent occurrence of emergencies urgently requires innovative ideas based on professional knowledge, experience, information and so on, to realize the new situation of unexpected events. Random and predictable governance, scientific decision making, democratic decision making and powerful intellectual support of new problems are the key to solve the problems of governance efficiently and flexibly. As a policy research institution in a professional field, think tanks are carriers of knowledge and ideas. They can systematically analyze governance problems in social governance innovation through knowledge, information and experience based on long-term research. And put forward foresight, according to local conditions, scientific and effective policy advice. The breakthrough of complex, pluralistic and dynamic governance problems in the process of social governance innovation can not be separated from the professional knowledge of think tanks and the driving force of innovative ideas. By clarifying the concepts of think-tank and social governance innovation, this paper probes into the motivation of social governance innovation driven by think-tank. As far as the role of think tanks in social operation is concerned, think tanks exist as a form of governance, and the key words of think tanks and the key words of governance can be connected seamlessly. The complexity of social governance innovation makes Zhizhi a demand of governance. Social governance innovation needs to be forward-looking, professional decision making, and social governance innovation policy analysis of the needs of the market and the needs of public participation. Also make think-tank drive become the intrinsic requirement of promoting social governance innovation. On the basis of clarifying the function and participating mechanism of think-tank in the innovation of social governance, this paper systematically analyzes the problems that hinder the think-tank to drive the innovation of social governance from three angles: the environment of rule of law, the ability of think tank itself, and the system environment. The law is the important instrument of the country, and the good law is the premise of good governance. The blank of the relevant legislation of think-tank and the imperfection of the system environment become the biggest obstacle that hinders the think-tank to drive the innovation of social governance. At the same time, the lack of ability of the think tank itself also hinders the function of the think tank. Aiming at the specific problems and combining the situation of our country, this paper analyzes the path of promoting the innovation of social governance driven by think tanks under the framework of the rule of law. In order to make the innovation of social governance driven by think tanks become a regular mechanism, it is necessary for the law to confirm and guarantee the right, procedure and order of participation of think tanks, and to bring the participation of think tanks into the track of rule by law. At the same time, it is necessary to enhance the ability of the think-tank to drive the innovation of social governance by strengthening the construction of the talent team, the influence construction and the database construction of the think-tank. Finally, it is necessary to strengthen the institutionalization construction of social governance innovation driven by think-tanks, and then realize the coordinated development between think-tanks and social governance innovations, and promote the early realization of the modernization of national governance system and governance ability.
【学位授予单位】:山东科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李艳萍;翟善梅;;我国社会智库的发展动因及建设路径探析[J];怀化学院学报;2016年07期
2 刘琦岩;;智库以知识管理引导社会治理路径探析[J];中国软科学;2016年06期
3 董石桃;刘勇;;美国高校智库国际化发展及其启示——基于普林斯顿大学威尔逊公共与国际事务学院的考察[J];比较教育研究;2016年03期
4 杨宝强;;我国社会智库运行机制的结构审视与逻辑指向[J];湖北社会科学;2016年01期
5 张广汇;张朝;;中国特色社会智库管理与发展的政策性建议[J];中国民政;2016年05期
6 闵学勤;;智库驱动:社会治理创新的中国探索[J];南京社会科学;2016年02期
7 全守杰;王运来;;高校智库的涵义与特征[J];现代教育管理;2016年01期
8 吴湛微;禹卫华;;大数据如何改善社会治理:国外“大数据社会福祉”运动的案例分析和借鉴[J];中国行政管理;2016年01期
9 苏江丽;;美国大学智库的功能及其对我国大学智库建设的启示[J];探索;2015年06期
10 朱旭峰;韩万渠;;中国特色新型高校智库的兴起、困境与探索——以中国人民大学智库建设为例[J];高等教育评论;2015年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 李卫红;;高校在新型智库建设中的使命担当[N];人民日报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 关爽;国象主导的社会治理:当代中国社会治理的发展模式与逻辑[D];浙江大学;2015年
2 赵萍;风险社会理论视域下中国社会治理创新的困境与出路研究[D];山东大学;2014年
3 武小川;论公众参与社会治理的法治化[D];武汉大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张钰婷;行政法视角下的法学会智库建设研究[D];安徽大学;2016年
,本文编号:2175207
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2175207.html